Subgroup analyses in randomized clinical trials: value and limitations. Review #3 on important aspects of randomized clinical trials in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Subgroup analyses in randomized clinical trials : value and limitations. Review #3 on important aspects of randomized clinical trials in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy. / Drexel, Heinz; Pocock, Stuart J.; Lewis, Basil S.; Saely, Christoph H.; Kaski, Juan Carlos; Rosano, Giuseppe M.C.; Tautermann, Gerda; Huber, Kurt; Dopheide, Joern F.; Mader, Arthur; Niessner, Alexander; Savarese, Gianluigi; Schmidt, Thomas A.; Semb, Anne Grete; Tamargo, Juan; Wassmann, Sven; Clodi, Martin; Kjeldsen, Keld Per; Agewall, Stefan.
I: European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy, Bind 8, Nr. 3, 2022, s. 302-310.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Subgroup analyses in randomized clinical trials
T2 - value and limitations. Review #3 on important aspects of randomized clinical trials in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy
AU - Drexel, Heinz
AU - Pocock, Stuart J.
AU - Lewis, Basil S.
AU - Saely, Christoph H.
AU - Kaski, Juan Carlos
AU - Rosano, Giuseppe M.C.
AU - Tautermann, Gerda
AU - Huber, Kurt
AU - Dopheide, Joern F.
AU - Mader, Arthur
AU - Niessner, Alexander
AU - Savarese, Gianluigi
AU - Schmidt, Thomas A.
AU - Semb, Anne Grete
AU - Tamargo, Juan
AU - Wassmann, Sven
AU - Clodi, Martin
AU - Kjeldsen, Keld Per
AU - Agewall, Stefan
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Two review articles previously published from our working group were dedicated to the selection of endpoints as well as to reasons for premature stopping of randomized clinical trials (RCTs).1,2 We there first discussed the importance of mortality and morbidity endpoints vs. softer endpoints like revascularization rates and the issue of endpoint adjudication. Second, we have shed light on the statistical methods and requirements to stop RCTs prematurely due to safety, futility, or overwhelming efficacy (vs. the control arm).The main objective of this article is now to provide the clinical cardiologist with information how to judge and interpret published subgroup analyses. The next section will summarize the situation regarding subgroup analysis and put the current article in context.
AB - Two review articles previously published from our working group were dedicated to the selection of endpoints as well as to reasons for premature stopping of randomized clinical trials (RCTs).1,2 We there first discussed the importance of mortality and morbidity endpoints vs. softer endpoints like revascularization rates and the issue of endpoint adjudication. Second, we have shed light on the statistical methods and requirements to stop RCTs prematurely due to safety, futility, or overwhelming efficacy (vs. the control arm).The main objective of this article is now to provide the clinical cardiologist with information how to judge and interpret published subgroup analyses. The next section will summarize the situation regarding subgroup analysis and put the current article in context.
KW - Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy
KW - Randomized clinical trials
KW - Subgroup analyses
U2 - 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvab048
DO - 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvab048
M3 - Review
C2 - 34180504
AN - SCOPUS:85129998085
VL - 8
SP - 302
EP - 310
JO - European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
JF - European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
SN - 2055-6837
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 313707849