State, territoriality, and sovereignty

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

State, territoriality, and sovereignty. / Branch, Jordan; Stockbruegger, Jan.

The Oxford Handbook of History and International Relations. red. / Mlada Bukovansky; Edward Keene; Christian Reus-Smit; Maja Spanu. Oxford : Oxford University Press Australia, 2023. s. 173-187.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Branch, J & Stockbruegger, J 2023, State, territoriality, and sovereignty. i M Bukovansky, E Keene, C Reus-Smit & M Spanu (red), The Oxford Handbook of History and International Relations. Oxford University Press Australia, Oxford, s. 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198873457.001.0001

APA

Branch, J., & Stockbruegger, J. (2023). State, territoriality, and sovereignty. I M. Bukovansky, E. Keene, C. Reus-Smit, & M. Spanu (red.), The Oxford Handbook of History and International Relations (s. 173-187). Oxford University Press Australia. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198873457.001.0001

Vancouver

Branch J, Stockbruegger J. State, territoriality, and sovereignty. I Bukovansky M, Keene E, Reus-Smit C, Spanu M, red., The Oxford Handbook of History and International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press Australia. 2023. s. 173-187 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198873457.001.0001

Author

Branch, Jordan ; Stockbruegger, Jan. / State, territoriality, and sovereignty. The Oxford Handbook of History and International Relations. red. / Mlada Bukovansky ; Edward Keene ; Christian Reus-Smit ; Maja Spanu. Oxford : Oxford University Press Australia, 2023. s. 173-187

Bibtex

@inbook{ab0a18871c5541f280f3a277df46d213,
title = "State, territoriality, and sovereignty",
abstract = "This chapter considers three concepts—state, territory, sovereignty—that are fundamental not only to the intersection of History and International Relations (IR) but also to IR theoretical debates. We track how the literature on these concepts has changed over time and discuss broad critiques and avenues for future research. We argue that state, territory, and sovereignty need to be studied as analytically distinct yet interrelated outcomes and processes. Key challenges for historical IR scholarship include overcoming a Eurocentric bias inherent in these concepts, how to apply contemporary concepts to earlier historical periods, and how—and whether—to draw lessons from history for contemporary politics. Finally, historical IR scholars could pay more attention to the important yet largely unexplored material dimensions of state, territory, and sovereignty.",
author = "Jordan Branch and Jan Stockbruegger",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198873457.001.0001",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780198873457",
pages = "173--187",
editor = "Mlada Bukovansky and Edward Keene and Christian Reus-Smit and Maja Spanu",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of History and International Relations",
publisher = "Oxford University Press Australia",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - State, territoriality, and sovereignty

AU - Branch, Jordan

AU - Stockbruegger, Jan

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - This chapter considers three concepts—state, territory, sovereignty—that are fundamental not only to the intersection of History and International Relations (IR) but also to IR theoretical debates. We track how the literature on these concepts has changed over time and discuss broad critiques and avenues for future research. We argue that state, territory, and sovereignty need to be studied as analytically distinct yet interrelated outcomes and processes. Key challenges for historical IR scholarship include overcoming a Eurocentric bias inherent in these concepts, how to apply contemporary concepts to earlier historical periods, and how—and whether—to draw lessons from history for contemporary politics. Finally, historical IR scholars could pay more attention to the important yet largely unexplored material dimensions of state, territory, and sovereignty.

AB - This chapter considers three concepts—state, territory, sovereignty—that are fundamental not only to the intersection of History and International Relations (IR) but also to IR theoretical debates. We track how the literature on these concepts has changed over time and discuss broad critiques and avenues for future research. We argue that state, territory, and sovereignty need to be studied as analytically distinct yet interrelated outcomes and processes. Key challenges for historical IR scholarship include overcoming a Eurocentric bias inherent in these concepts, how to apply contemporary concepts to earlier historical periods, and how—and whether—to draw lessons from history for contemporary politics. Finally, historical IR scholars could pay more attention to the important yet largely unexplored material dimensions of state, territory, and sovereignty.

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198873457.001.0001

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198873457.001.0001

M3 - Book chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85184307494

SN - 9780198873457

SP - 173

EP - 187

BT - The Oxford Handbook of History and International Relations

A2 - Bukovansky, Mlada

A2 - Keene, Edward

A2 - Reus-Smit, Christian

A2 - Spanu, Maja

PB - Oxford University Press Australia

CY - Oxford

ER -

ID: 387335085