Socioeconomic Differences in Referral to Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials: A Danish Matched Cancer Case-Control Study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Socioeconomic Differences in Referral to Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials : A Danish Matched Cancer Case-Control Study. / Gad, Katrine Toubro; Johansen, Christoffer; Duun-Henriksen, Anne Katrine; Krøyer, Anja; Olsen, Maja Halgren; Lassen, Ulrik; Mau-Sørensen, Morten; Oksberg Dalton, Susanne.

I: Journal of Clinical Oncology, Bind 37, Nr. 13, 01.05.2019, s. 1111-1119.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Gad, KT, Johansen, C, Duun-Henriksen, AK, Krøyer, A, Olsen, MH, Lassen, U, Mau-Sørensen, M & Oksberg Dalton, S 2019, 'Socioeconomic Differences in Referral to Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials: A Danish Matched Cancer Case-Control Study', Journal of Clinical Oncology, bind 37, nr. 13, s. 1111-1119. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.01983

APA

Gad, K. T., Johansen, C., Duun-Henriksen, A. K., Krøyer, A., Olsen, M. H., Lassen, U., Mau-Sørensen, M., & Oksberg Dalton, S. (2019). Socioeconomic Differences in Referral to Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials: A Danish Matched Cancer Case-Control Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 37(13), 1111-1119. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.01983

Vancouver

Gad KT, Johansen C, Duun-Henriksen AK, Krøyer A, Olsen MH, Lassen U o.a. Socioeconomic Differences in Referral to Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials: A Danish Matched Cancer Case-Control Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2019 maj 1;37(13):1111-1119. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.01983

Author

Gad, Katrine Toubro ; Johansen, Christoffer ; Duun-Henriksen, Anne Katrine ; Krøyer, Anja ; Olsen, Maja Halgren ; Lassen, Ulrik ; Mau-Sørensen, Morten ; Oksberg Dalton, Susanne. / Socioeconomic Differences in Referral to Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials : A Danish Matched Cancer Case-Control Study. I: Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2019 ; Bind 37, Nr. 13. s. 1111-1119.

Bibtex

@article{3267ad1a156c42a694060086cf360e10,
title = "Socioeconomic Differences in Referral to Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials: A Danish Matched Cancer Case-Control Study",
abstract = "PURPOSE: In this nationwide registry study, we investigated socioeconomic and structural patterns in referral to phase I cancer trials in a case-control study design.METHODS: Personal identification numbers on all Danish patients referred to the Danish Phase I Unit at Rigshospitalet from 2005 to 2016, and a control group matched on age, sex, type of cancer, year of diagnosis, and time from diagnosis to referral ensured individual-level linkage between several registries. We examined the association between nonclinical factors-indicators of socioeconomic position and distance to the Phase I Unit-and referral using a conditional logistic regression analysis adjusted for several clinical factors. Association between nonclinical factors and enrollment once referred was examined with a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis in an historical cohort study design.RESULTS: Complete data were available for 1,026 (84%) of 1,220 referred patients. Significantly decreased odds for referral were identified for patients with long distance to the Phase I Unit compared with short distance (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.35; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.41), for less education (less than 9 years) compared with more (more than 12 years; OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.91), and for belonging to the lowest income quintile compared with the highest (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.97). Medium education (9 to 12 years) compared with more, being outside the workforce compared with being within, and living alone compared with living with a partner were also negatively associated with referral. Among patients referred, 252 enrolled in a trial. Nonclinical factors were not associated with enrollment.CONCLUSION: On the basis of individual long-term registry data from an unselected cohort, novel anticancer therapies seem to be tested on a socially selected group of patients with cancer.",
author = "Gad, {Katrine Toubro} and Christoffer Johansen and Duun-Henriksen, {Anne Katrine} and Anja Kr{\o}yer and Olsen, {Maja Halgren} and Ulrik Lassen and Morten Mau-S{\o}rensen and {Oksberg Dalton}, Susanne",
year = "2019",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1200/JCO.18.01983",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "1111--1119",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Oncology",
issn = "0732-183X",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Oncology",
number = "13",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socioeconomic Differences in Referral to Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials

T2 - A Danish Matched Cancer Case-Control Study

AU - Gad, Katrine Toubro

AU - Johansen, Christoffer

AU - Duun-Henriksen, Anne Katrine

AU - Krøyer, Anja

AU - Olsen, Maja Halgren

AU - Lassen, Ulrik

AU - Mau-Sørensen, Morten

AU - Oksberg Dalton, Susanne

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - PURPOSE: In this nationwide registry study, we investigated socioeconomic and structural patterns in referral to phase I cancer trials in a case-control study design.METHODS: Personal identification numbers on all Danish patients referred to the Danish Phase I Unit at Rigshospitalet from 2005 to 2016, and a control group matched on age, sex, type of cancer, year of diagnosis, and time from diagnosis to referral ensured individual-level linkage between several registries. We examined the association between nonclinical factors-indicators of socioeconomic position and distance to the Phase I Unit-and referral using a conditional logistic regression analysis adjusted for several clinical factors. Association between nonclinical factors and enrollment once referred was examined with a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis in an historical cohort study design.RESULTS: Complete data were available for 1,026 (84%) of 1,220 referred patients. Significantly decreased odds for referral were identified for patients with long distance to the Phase I Unit compared with short distance (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.35; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.41), for less education (less than 9 years) compared with more (more than 12 years; OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.91), and for belonging to the lowest income quintile compared with the highest (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.97). Medium education (9 to 12 years) compared with more, being outside the workforce compared with being within, and living alone compared with living with a partner were also negatively associated with referral. Among patients referred, 252 enrolled in a trial. Nonclinical factors were not associated with enrollment.CONCLUSION: On the basis of individual long-term registry data from an unselected cohort, novel anticancer therapies seem to be tested on a socially selected group of patients with cancer.

AB - PURPOSE: In this nationwide registry study, we investigated socioeconomic and structural patterns in referral to phase I cancer trials in a case-control study design.METHODS: Personal identification numbers on all Danish patients referred to the Danish Phase I Unit at Rigshospitalet from 2005 to 2016, and a control group matched on age, sex, type of cancer, year of diagnosis, and time from diagnosis to referral ensured individual-level linkage between several registries. We examined the association between nonclinical factors-indicators of socioeconomic position and distance to the Phase I Unit-and referral using a conditional logistic regression analysis adjusted for several clinical factors. Association between nonclinical factors and enrollment once referred was examined with a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis in an historical cohort study design.RESULTS: Complete data were available for 1,026 (84%) of 1,220 referred patients. Significantly decreased odds for referral were identified for patients with long distance to the Phase I Unit compared with short distance (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.35; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.41), for less education (less than 9 years) compared with more (more than 12 years; OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.91), and for belonging to the lowest income quintile compared with the highest (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.97). Medium education (9 to 12 years) compared with more, being outside the workforce compared with being within, and living alone compared with living with a partner were also negatively associated with referral. Among patients referred, 252 enrolled in a trial. Nonclinical factors were not associated with enrollment.CONCLUSION: On the basis of individual long-term registry data from an unselected cohort, novel anticancer therapies seem to be tested on a socially selected group of patients with cancer.

U2 - 10.1200/JCO.18.01983

DO - 10.1200/JCO.18.01983

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30860947

VL - 37

SP - 1111

EP - 1119

JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology

JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology

SN - 0732-183X

IS - 13

ER -

ID: 235155433