Small bowel anastomosis in peritonitis compared to enterostomy formation: a systematic review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Small bowel anastomosis in peritonitis compared to enterostomy formation : a systematic review. / Skovsen, Anders Peter; Burcharth, Jakob; Gögenur, Ismail; Tolstrup, Mai-Britt.

I: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Bind 49, Nr. 5, 2023, s. 2047-2055.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Skovsen, AP, Burcharth, J, Gögenur, I & Tolstrup, M-B 2023, 'Small bowel anastomosis in peritonitis compared to enterostomy formation: a systematic review', European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, bind 49, nr. 5, s. 2047-2055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02192-7

APA

Skovsen, A. P., Burcharth, J., Gögenur, I., & Tolstrup, M-B. (2023). Small bowel anastomosis in peritonitis compared to enterostomy formation: a systematic review. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 49(5), 2047-2055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02192-7

Vancouver

Skovsen AP, Burcharth J, Gögenur I, Tolstrup M-B. Small bowel anastomosis in peritonitis compared to enterostomy formation: a systematic review. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 2023;49(5):2047-2055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02192-7

Author

Skovsen, Anders Peter ; Burcharth, Jakob ; Gögenur, Ismail ; Tolstrup, Mai-Britt. / Small bowel anastomosis in peritonitis compared to enterostomy formation : a systematic review. I: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 2023 ; Bind 49, Nr. 5. s. 2047-2055.

Bibtex

@article{c02f0a3f7fab4148b430ba4715ab77b2,
title = "Small bowel anastomosis in peritonitis compared to enterostomy formation: a systematic review",
abstract = "Purpose: Anastomotic leakage after small bowel resection in emergency laparotomy is a severe complication. A consensus on the risk factors for anastomotic leakage has not been established, and it is still unclear if peritonitis is a risk factor. This systematic review aimed to evaluate if an entero-entero/entero-colonic anastomosis is safe in patients with peritonitis undergoing abdominal acute care surgery. Methods: A systematic literature review based on PRISMA guidelines was performed, searching the databases Pubmed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Science Direct for studies of anastomosis in peritonitis. Patients with an anastomosis after non-planned small bowel resection (ischemia, perforation, or strangulation), including secondary peritonitis, were included. Elective laparotomies and colo-colonic anastomoses were excluded. Due to the etiology, traumatic perforation, in-vitro, and animal studies were excluded. Results: This review identified 26 studies of small-bowel anastomosis in peritonitis with a total of 2807 patients. This population included a total of 889 small-bowel/right colonic resections with anastomoses, and 242 enterostomies. All studies, except two, were retrospective reviews or case series. The overall mortality rates were 0–20% and anastomotic leakage rates 0–36%. After performing a risk of bias evaluation there was no basis for conducting a meta-analysis. The quality of evidence was rated as low. Conclusion: There was no evidence to refute performing a primary small-bowel anastomosis in acute laparotomy with peritonitis. There is currently insufficient evidence to label peritonitis as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage in acute care laparotomy with small-bowel resection. Trial registration: The review was registered with the PROSPERO register of systematic reviews on 14/07/2020 with the ID: CRD42020168670.",
keywords = "Acute care surgery, Anastomosis, Anastomotic leakage, Emergency surgery, Laparotomy, Peritonitis",
author = "Skovsen, {Anders Peter} and Jakob Burcharth and Ismail G{\"o}genur and Mai-Britt Tolstrup",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1007/s00068-022-02192-7",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "2047--2055",
journal = "European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery",
issn = "1863-9933",
publisher = "Springer Medizin",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Small bowel anastomosis in peritonitis compared to enterostomy formation

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Skovsen, Anders Peter

AU - Burcharth, Jakob

AU - Gögenur, Ismail

AU - Tolstrup, Mai-Britt

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Purpose: Anastomotic leakage after small bowel resection in emergency laparotomy is a severe complication. A consensus on the risk factors for anastomotic leakage has not been established, and it is still unclear if peritonitis is a risk factor. This systematic review aimed to evaluate if an entero-entero/entero-colonic anastomosis is safe in patients with peritonitis undergoing abdominal acute care surgery. Methods: A systematic literature review based on PRISMA guidelines was performed, searching the databases Pubmed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Science Direct for studies of anastomosis in peritonitis. Patients with an anastomosis after non-planned small bowel resection (ischemia, perforation, or strangulation), including secondary peritonitis, were included. Elective laparotomies and colo-colonic anastomoses were excluded. Due to the etiology, traumatic perforation, in-vitro, and animal studies were excluded. Results: This review identified 26 studies of small-bowel anastomosis in peritonitis with a total of 2807 patients. This population included a total of 889 small-bowel/right colonic resections with anastomoses, and 242 enterostomies. All studies, except two, were retrospective reviews or case series. The overall mortality rates were 0–20% and anastomotic leakage rates 0–36%. After performing a risk of bias evaluation there was no basis for conducting a meta-analysis. The quality of evidence was rated as low. Conclusion: There was no evidence to refute performing a primary small-bowel anastomosis in acute laparotomy with peritonitis. There is currently insufficient evidence to label peritonitis as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage in acute care laparotomy with small-bowel resection. Trial registration: The review was registered with the PROSPERO register of systematic reviews on 14/07/2020 with the ID: CRD42020168670.

AB - Purpose: Anastomotic leakage after small bowel resection in emergency laparotomy is a severe complication. A consensus on the risk factors for anastomotic leakage has not been established, and it is still unclear if peritonitis is a risk factor. This systematic review aimed to evaluate if an entero-entero/entero-colonic anastomosis is safe in patients with peritonitis undergoing abdominal acute care surgery. Methods: A systematic literature review based on PRISMA guidelines was performed, searching the databases Pubmed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Science Direct for studies of anastomosis in peritonitis. Patients with an anastomosis after non-planned small bowel resection (ischemia, perforation, or strangulation), including secondary peritonitis, were included. Elective laparotomies and colo-colonic anastomoses were excluded. Due to the etiology, traumatic perforation, in-vitro, and animal studies were excluded. Results: This review identified 26 studies of small-bowel anastomosis in peritonitis with a total of 2807 patients. This population included a total of 889 small-bowel/right colonic resections with anastomoses, and 242 enterostomies. All studies, except two, were retrospective reviews or case series. The overall mortality rates were 0–20% and anastomotic leakage rates 0–36%. After performing a risk of bias evaluation there was no basis for conducting a meta-analysis. The quality of evidence was rated as low. Conclusion: There was no evidence to refute performing a primary small-bowel anastomosis in acute laparotomy with peritonitis. There is currently insufficient evidence to label peritonitis as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage in acute care laparotomy with small-bowel resection. Trial registration: The review was registered with the PROSPERO register of systematic reviews on 14/07/2020 with the ID: CRD42020168670.

KW - Acute care surgery

KW - Anastomosis

KW - Anastomotic leakage

KW - Emergency surgery

KW - Laparotomy

KW - Peritonitis

U2 - 10.1007/s00068-022-02192-7

DO - 10.1007/s00068-022-02192-7

M3 - Review

C2 - 36526812

AN - SCOPUS:85144120662

VL - 49

SP - 2047

EP - 2055

JO - European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery

JF - European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery

SN - 1863-9933

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 335097483