Small bowel anastomosis in peritonitis compared to enterostomy formation: a systematic review
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Small bowel anastomosis in peritonitis compared to enterostomy formation : a systematic review. / Skovsen, Anders Peter; Burcharth, Jakob; Gögenur, Ismail; Tolstrup, Mai-Britt.
I: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Bind 49, Nr. 5, 2023, s. 2047-2055.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Small bowel anastomosis in peritonitis compared to enterostomy formation
T2 - a systematic review
AU - Skovsen, Anders Peter
AU - Burcharth, Jakob
AU - Gögenur, Ismail
AU - Tolstrup, Mai-Britt
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Purpose: Anastomotic leakage after small bowel resection in emergency laparotomy is a severe complication. A consensus on the risk factors for anastomotic leakage has not been established, and it is still unclear if peritonitis is a risk factor. This systematic review aimed to evaluate if an entero-entero/entero-colonic anastomosis is safe in patients with peritonitis undergoing abdominal acute care surgery. Methods: A systematic literature review based on PRISMA guidelines was performed, searching the databases Pubmed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Science Direct for studies of anastomosis in peritonitis. Patients with an anastomosis after non-planned small bowel resection (ischemia, perforation, or strangulation), including secondary peritonitis, were included. Elective laparotomies and colo-colonic anastomoses were excluded. Due to the etiology, traumatic perforation, in-vitro, and animal studies were excluded. Results: This review identified 26 studies of small-bowel anastomosis in peritonitis with a total of 2807 patients. This population included a total of 889 small-bowel/right colonic resections with anastomoses, and 242 enterostomies. All studies, except two, were retrospective reviews or case series. The overall mortality rates were 0–20% and anastomotic leakage rates 0–36%. After performing a risk of bias evaluation there was no basis for conducting a meta-analysis. The quality of evidence was rated as low. Conclusion: There was no evidence to refute performing a primary small-bowel anastomosis in acute laparotomy with peritonitis. There is currently insufficient evidence to label peritonitis as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage in acute care laparotomy with small-bowel resection. Trial registration: The review was registered with the PROSPERO register of systematic reviews on 14/07/2020 with the ID: CRD42020168670.
AB - Purpose: Anastomotic leakage after small bowel resection in emergency laparotomy is a severe complication. A consensus on the risk factors for anastomotic leakage has not been established, and it is still unclear if peritonitis is a risk factor. This systematic review aimed to evaluate if an entero-entero/entero-colonic anastomosis is safe in patients with peritonitis undergoing abdominal acute care surgery. Methods: A systematic literature review based on PRISMA guidelines was performed, searching the databases Pubmed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Science Direct for studies of anastomosis in peritonitis. Patients with an anastomosis after non-planned small bowel resection (ischemia, perforation, or strangulation), including secondary peritonitis, were included. Elective laparotomies and colo-colonic anastomoses were excluded. Due to the etiology, traumatic perforation, in-vitro, and animal studies were excluded. Results: This review identified 26 studies of small-bowel anastomosis in peritonitis with a total of 2807 patients. This population included a total of 889 small-bowel/right colonic resections with anastomoses, and 242 enterostomies. All studies, except two, were retrospective reviews or case series. The overall mortality rates were 0–20% and anastomotic leakage rates 0–36%. After performing a risk of bias evaluation there was no basis for conducting a meta-analysis. The quality of evidence was rated as low. Conclusion: There was no evidence to refute performing a primary small-bowel anastomosis in acute laparotomy with peritonitis. There is currently insufficient evidence to label peritonitis as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage in acute care laparotomy with small-bowel resection. Trial registration: The review was registered with the PROSPERO register of systematic reviews on 14/07/2020 with the ID: CRD42020168670.
KW - Acute care surgery
KW - Anastomosis
KW - Anastomotic leakage
KW - Emergency surgery
KW - Laparotomy
KW - Peritonitis
U2 - 10.1007/s00068-022-02192-7
DO - 10.1007/s00068-022-02192-7
M3 - Review
C2 - 36526812
AN - SCOPUS:85144120662
VL - 49
SP - 2047
EP - 2055
JO - European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
JF - European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
SN - 1863-9933
IS - 5
ER -
ID: 335097483