TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity and specificity for detecting pseudotumors in patients with hip resurfacing arthroplasty, metal-on-metal or metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty—MRI versus ultrasonography performed by an orthopedic surgery resident

AU - Mikkelsen, Rasmus T

AU - Schou, Martin

AU - Torfing, Trine

AU - Graumann, Ole

AU - Overgaard, Søren

AU - Varnum, Claus

PY - 2023/2/1

Y1 - 2023/2/1

N2 - Background Metal artifact reduction sequence magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan is a common method to detect adverse reaction to metal debris in total hip arthroplasty (THA). It might be quicker and cheaper if ultrasonography (US) could screen for the need for an MRI. However, both require trained personnel.PurposeWe aimed to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of US for detecting pseudotumors (PT) when performed by an orthopedic surgery resident compared to MRI. We also investigated the sensitivity and specificity of US to detect PTs in obese and non-obese patients.Material and methodsWe examined 205 patients with hip resurfacing arthroplasty, metal-on-metal or metal-on-polyethylene THA with both MRI and US. US was performed by an orthopedic surgery resident who was trained according to a standardized training program in musculoskeletal US. Results from MRI were used as gold standard.ResultsUS had a sensitivity of 0.92 (95% CI 0.81–0.98) and specificity of 0.94 (95% CI 0.89–0.97) for detecting PT. It had a positive predictive value of 0.84 (95% CI 0.73–0.91) and a negative predictive value of 0.97 (95% CI 0.93–0.99). US performed similarly in obese and non-obese patients.ConclusionsUS had a high sensitivity and specificity for detecting PT when performed by an orthopedic surgery resident. Trained orthopedic surgeons could screen for the need of an MRI scan when searching PTs.

AB - Background Metal artifact reduction sequence magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan is a common method to detect adverse reaction to metal debris in total hip arthroplasty (THA). It might be quicker and cheaper if ultrasonography (US) could screen for the need for an MRI. However, both require trained personnel.PurposeWe aimed to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of US for detecting pseudotumors (PT) when performed by an orthopedic surgery resident compared to MRI. We also investigated the sensitivity and specificity of US to detect PTs in obese and non-obese patients.Material and methodsWe examined 205 patients with hip resurfacing arthroplasty, metal-on-metal or metal-on-polyethylene THA with both MRI and US. US was performed by an orthopedic surgery resident who was trained according to a standardized training program in musculoskeletal US. Results from MRI were used as gold standard.ResultsUS had a sensitivity of 0.92 (95% CI 0.81–0.98) and specificity of 0.94 (95% CI 0.89–0.97) for detecting PT. It had a positive predictive value of 0.84 (95% CI 0.73–0.91) and a negative predictive value of 0.97 (95% CI 0.93–0.99). US performed similarly in obese and non-obese patients.ConclusionsUS had a high sensitivity and specificity for detecting PT when performed by an orthopedic surgery resident. Trained orthopedic surgeons could screen for the need of an MRI scan when searching PTs.

U2 - 10.1177/20584601231152396

DO - 10.1177/20584601231152396

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36776533

VL - 12

JO - Acta Radiologica Short Reports

JF - Acta Radiologica Short Reports

SN - 2047-9816

IS - 2

ER -