Screening for cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression: Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Screening for cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression : Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools. / Ott, Caroline Vintergaard; Bjertrup, Anne Juul; Jensen, Johan Høy; Ullum, Henrik; Sjælland, René; Purdon, Scot E; Vieta, Eduard; Kessing, Lars V; Miskowiak, Kamilla W.
I: Journal of Affective Disorders, Bind 190, 15.01.2016, s. 607-15.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Screening for cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression
T2 - Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools
AU - Ott, Caroline Vintergaard
AU - Bjertrup, Anne Juul
AU - Jensen, Johan Høy
AU - Ullum, Henrik
AU - Sjælland, René
AU - Purdon, Scot E
AU - Vieta, Eduard
AU - Kessing, Lars V
AU - Miskowiak, Kamilla W
N1 - Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/1/15
Y1 - 2016/1/15
N2 - BACKGROUND: Persistent cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression (UD) contributes to socio-occupational impairment, but there are no feasible methods to screen for and monitor cognitive dysfunction in this patient group. The present study investigated the validity of two new instruments to screen for cognitive dysfunction in UD, and their associations with socio-occupational capacity.METHOD: Participants (n=53) with UD in partial or full remission and healthy control persons (n=103) were assessed with two new screening instruments, the Danish translations of the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP-D) and Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment (COBRA) and with established neuropsychological and self-assessment measures. Depression symptoms and socio-occupational function were rated with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Functional Assessment Short Test respectively.RESULTS: The SCIP-D and COBRA were valid for detection of objective and subjective cognitive impairment, respectively. The three parallel SCIP-D forms were equivalent. A combined SCIP-D-COBRA measure showed high sensitivity and good specificity for objective cognitive impairment (91% and 70%, respectively). There was no correlation between subjective and objective measures of cognition. Subjective cognitive difficulties correlated more with socio-occupational impairment (r=0.7, p<0.01) than did objective cognitive difficulties, for which there was a weak correlation with the executive skills domain only (r =-0.3, p=0.05).LIMITATIONS: A modest sample size.CONCLUSIONS: The SCIP-D and COBRA are valid measures of objective and subjective cognitive impairment, respectively, and should ideally be implemented together in the screening for cognitive dysfunction in UD.
AB - BACKGROUND: Persistent cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression (UD) contributes to socio-occupational impairment, but there are no feasible methods to screen for and monitor cognitive dysfunction in this patient group. The present study investigated the validity of two new instruments to screen for cognitive dysfunction in UD, and their associations with socio-occupational capacity.METHOD: Participants (n=53) with UD in partial or full remission and healthy control persons (n=103) were assessed with two new screening instruments, the Danish translations of the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP-D) and Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment (COBRA) and with established neuropsychological and self-assessment measures. Depression symptoms and socio-occupational function were rated with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Functional Assessment Short Test respectively.RESULTS: The SCIP-D and COBRA were valid for detection of objective and subjective cognitive impairment, respectively. The three parallel SCIP-D forms were equivalent. A combined SCIP-D-COBRA measure showed high sensitivity and good specificity for objective cognitive impairment (91% and 70%, respectively). There was no correlation between subjective and objective measures of cognition. Subjective cognitive difficulties correlated more with socio-occupational impairment (r=0.7, p<0.01) than did objective cognitive difficulties, for which there was a weak correlation with the executive skills domain only (r =-0.3, p=0.05).LIMITATIONS: A modest sample size.CONCLUSIONS: The SCIP-D and COBRA are valid measures of objective and subjective cognitive impairment, respectively, and should ideally be implemented together in the screening for cognitive dysfunction in UD.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.059
DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.059
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 26583350
VL - 190
SP - 607
EP - 615
JO - Journal of Affective Disorders
JF - Journal of Affective Disorders
SN - 0165-0327
ER -
ID: 162034417