Screening for cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression: Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Screening for cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression : Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools. / Ott, Caroline Vintergaard; Bjertrup, Anne Juul; Jensen, Johan Høy; Ullum, Henrik; Sjælland, René; Purdon, Scot E; Vieta, Eduard; Kessing, Lars V; Miskowiak, Kamilla W.

I: Journal of Affective Disorders, Bind 190, 15.01.2016, s. 607-15.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ott, CV, Bjertrup, AJ, Jensen, JH, Ullum, H, Sjælland, R, Purdon, SE, Vieta, E, Kessing, LV & Miskowiak, KW 2016, 'Screening for cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression: Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools', Journal of Affective Disorders, bind 190, s. 607-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.059

APA

Ott, C. V., Bjertrup, A. J., Jensen, J. H., Ullum, H., Sjælland, R., Purdon, S. E., Vieta, E., Kessing, L. V., & Miskowiak, K. W. (2016). Screening for cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression: Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools. Journal of Affective Disorders, 190, 607-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.059

Vancouver

Ott CV, Bjertrup AJ, Jensen JH, Ullum H, Sjælland R, Purdon SE o.a. Screening for cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression: Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2016 jan. 15;190:607-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.059

Author

Ott, Caroline Vintergaard ; Bjertrup, Anne Juul ; Jensen, Johan Høy ; Ullum, Henrik ; Sjælland, René ; Purdon, Scot E ; Vieta, Eduard ; Kessing, Lars V ; Miskowiak, Kamilla W. / Screening for cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression : Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools. I: Journal of Affective Disorders. 2016 ; Bind 190. s. 607-15.

Bibtex

@article{34e17a9014cc4169bbcaad84ec0a4051,
title = "Screening for cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression: Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Persistent cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression (UD) contributes to socio-occupational impairment, but there are no feasible methods to screen for and monitor cognitive dysfunction in this patient group. The present study investigated the validity of two new instruments to screen for cognitive dysfunction in UD, and their associations with socio-occupational capacity.METHOD: Participants (n=53) with UD in partial or full remission and healthy control persons (n=103) were assessed with two new screening instruments, the Danish translations of the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP-D) and Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment (COBRA) and with established neuropsychological and self-assessment measures. Depression symptoms and socio-occupational function were rated with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Functional Assessment Short Test respectively.RESULTS: The SCIP-D and COBRA were valid for detection of objective and subjective cognitive impairment, respectively. The three parallel SCIP-D forms were equivalent. A combined SCIP-D-COBRA measure showed high sensitivity and good specificity for objective cognitive impairment (91% and 70%, respectively). There was no correlation between subjective and objective measures of cognition. Subjective cognitive difficulties correlated more with socio-occupational impairment (r=0.7, p<0.01) than did objective cognitive difficulties, for which there was a weak correlation with the executive skills domain only (r =-0.3, p=0.05).LIMITATIONS: A modest sample size.CONCLUSIONS: The SCIP-D and COBRA are valid measures of objective and subjective cognitive impairment, respectively, and should ideally be implemented together in the screening for cognitive dysfunction in UD.",
author = "Ott, {Caroline Vintergaard} and Bjertrup, {Anne Juul} and Jensen, {Johan H{\o}y} and Henrik Ullum and Ren{\'e} Sj{\ae}lland and Purdon, {Scot E} and Eduard Vieta and Kessing, {Lars V} and Miskowiak, {Kamilla W}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2016",
month = jan,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.059",
language = "English",
volume = "190",
pages = "607--15",
journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",
issn = "0165-0327",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Screening for cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression

T2 - Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools

AU - Ott, Caroline Vintergaard

AU - Bjertrup, Anne Juul

AU - Jensen, Johan Høy

AU - Ullum, Henrik

AU - Sjælland, René

AU - Purdon, Scot E

AU - Vieta, Eduard

AU - Kessing, Lars V

AU - Miskowiak, Kamilla W

N1 - Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2016/1/15

Y1 - 2016/1/15

N2 - BACKGROUND: Persistent cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression (UD) contributes to socio-occupational impairment, but there are no feasible methods to screen for and monitor cognitive dysfunction in this patient group. The present study investigated the validity of two new instruments to screen for cognitive dysfunction in UD, and their associations with socio-occupational capacity.METHOD: Participants (n=53) with UD in partial or full remission and healthy control persons (n=103) were assessed with two new screening instruments, the Danish translations of the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP-D) and Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment (COBRA) and with established neuropsychological and self-assessment measures. Depression symptoms and socio-occupational function were rated with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Functional Assessment Short Test respectively.RESULTS: The SCIP-D and COBRA were valid for detection of objective and subjective cognitive impairment, respectively. The three parallel SCIP-D forms were equivalent. A combined SCIP-D-COBRA measure showed high sensitivity and good specificity for objective cognitive impairment (91% and 70%, respectively). There was no correlation between subjective and objective measures of cognition. Subjective cognitive difficulties correlated more with socio-occupational impairment (r=0.7, p<0.01) than did objective cognitive difficulties, for which there was a weak correlation with the executive skills domain only (r =-0.3, p=0.05).LIMITATIONS: A modest sample size.CONCLUSIONS: The SCIP-D and COBRA are valid measures of objective and subjective cognitive impairment, respectively, and should ideally be implemented together in the screening for cognitive dysfunction in UD.

AB - BACKGROUND: Persistent cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression (UD) contributes to socio-occupational impairment, but there are no feasible methods to screen for and monitor cognitive dysfunction in this patient group. The present study investigated the validity of two new instruments to screen for cognitive dysfunction in UD, and their associations with socio-occupational capacity.METHOD: Participants (n=53) with UD in partial or full remission and healthy control persons (n=103) were assessed with two new screening instruments, the Danish translations of the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP-D) and Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment (COBRA) and with established neuropsychological and self-assessment measures. Depression symptoms and socio-occupational function were rated with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Functional Assessment Short Test respectively.RESULTS: The SCIP-D and COBRA were valid for detection of objective and subjective cognitive impairment, respectively. The three parallel SCIP-D forms were equivalent. A combined SCIP-D-COBRA measure showed high sensitivity and good specificity for objective cognitive impairment (91% and 70%, respectively). There was no correlation between subjective and objective measures of cognition. Subjective cognitive difficulties correlated more with socio-occupational impairment (r=0.7, p<0.01) than did objective cognitive difficulties, for which there was a weak correlation with the executive skills domain only (r =-0.3, p=0.05).LIMITATIONS: A modest sample size.CONCLUSIONS: The SCIP-D and COBRA are valid measures of objective and subjective cognitive impairment, respectively, and should ideally be implemented together in the screening for cognitive dysfunction in UD.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.059

DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.059

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26583350

VL - 190

SP - 607

EP - 615

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

SN - 0165-0327

ER -

ID: 162034417