Safety, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of High- Versus Low-Dose Ascorbic Acid in Severely Burned Adults

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Safety, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of High- Versus Low-Dose Ascorbic Acid in Severely Burned Adults. / Nagel, Sarah Sophie; Radu, Christian Andreas; Kremer, Thomas; Meess, David; Horter, Johannes; Ziegler, Benjamin; Hirche, Christoph; Schmidt, Volker Juergen; Kneser, Ulrich; Hundeshagen, Gabriel.

I: Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, Bind 41, Nr. 4, 2020, s. 871-877.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Nagel, SS, Radu, CA, Kremer, T, Meess, D, Horter, J, Ziegler, B, Hirche, C, Schmidt, VJ, Kneser, U & Hundeshagen, G 2020, 'Safety, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of High- Versus Low-Dose Ascorbic Acid in Severely Burned Adults', Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, bind 41, nr. 4, s. 871-877. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraa041

APA

Nagel, S. S., Radu, C. A., Kremer, T., Meess, D., Horter, J., Ziegler, B., Hirche, C., Schmidt, V. J., Kneser, U., & Hundeshagen, G. (2020). Safety, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of High- Versus Low-Dose Ascorbic Acid in Severely Burned Adults. Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 41(4), 871-877. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraa041

Vancouver

Nagel SS, Radu CA, Kremer T, Meess D, Horter J, Ziegler B o.a. Safety, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of High- Versus Low-Dose Ascorbic Acid in Severely Burned Adults. Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association. 2020;41(4):871-877. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraa041

Author

Nagel, Sarah Sophie ; Radu, Christian Andreas ; Kremer, Thomas ; Meess, David ; Horter, Johannes ; Ziegler, Benjamin ; Hirche, Christoph ; Schmidt, Volker Juergen ; Kneser, Ulrich ; Hundeshagen, Gabriel. / Safety, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of High- Versus Low-Dose Ascorbic Acid in Severely Burned Adults. I: Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association. 2020 ; Bind 41, Nr. 4. s. 871-877.

Bibtex

@article{44b6fd0d99e64fc59c13cb470b92a729,
title = "Safety, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of High- Versus Low-Dose Ascorbic Acid in Severely Burned Adults",
abstract = "In sepsis and burns, ascorbic acid (AA) is hypothesized advantageous during volume resuscitation. There is uncertainty regarding its safety and dosing. This study evaluated high dose AA (HDAA: 66 mg/kg/h for 24 hours) versus low dose AA (LDAA: 3.5 g/days) administration during the first 24 hours in severely burned adults. We conducted a retrospective study comparing fluid administration before and after switching from low dose to HDAA in severely burned adults. A total of 38 adults with burns >20% TBSA, who received either HDAA or LDAA were included in this retrospective study. AA serum concentrations were quantified at 0, 24, and 72 hours postburn. HDAA impact on hemodynamics, acid-base homeostasis, acute kidney injury, vasopressor use, resuscitation fluid requirement, urinary output, and the incidence of adverse effects was evaluated; secondary clinical outcomes were analyzed. AA plasma levels were 10-fold elevated in the LDAA and 150-fold elevated in the HDAA group at 24 hours and decreased in both groups afterwards. HDAA was not associated with a significantly increased risk of any complications. A significant reduction in colloid fluid requirements was noted (LDAA: 947 ± 1722 ml/24 hours vs HDAA: 278 ± 667 ml/24 hours, P = 0.029). Other hemodynamic and resuscitation measures, as well as secondary clinical outcomes were comparable between groups. HDAA was associated with higher AA levels and lower volumes of colloids in adults with severe burns. The rate of adverse events was not significantly higher in patients treated with HDAA. Future studies should consider prolonged administration of AA.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antioxidants/administration & dosage, Ascorbic Acid/administration & dosage, Burns/complications, Colloids/administration & dosage, Creatinine/analysis, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Fluid Therapy, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data, Male, Middle Aged, Renal Replacement Therapy/statistics & numerical data, Resuscitation, Retrospective Studies, Shock/etiology, Urine, Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use, Young Adult",
author = "Nagel, {Sarah Sophie} and Radu, {Christian Andreas} and Thomas Kremer and David Meess and Johannes Horter and Benjamin Ziegler and Christoph Hirche and Schmidt, {Volker Juergen} and Ulrich Kneser and Gabriel Hundeshagen",
note = "{\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1093/jbcr/iraa041",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "871--877",
journal = "Journal of Burn Care and Research",
issn = "1559-047X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of High- Versus Low-Dose Ascorbic Acid in Severely Burned Adults

AU - Nagel, Sarah Sophie

AU - Radu, Christian Andreas

AU - Kremer, Thomas

AU - Meess, David

AU - Horter, Johannes

AU - Ziegler, Benjamin

AU - Hirche, Christoph

AU - Schmidt, Volker Juergen

AU - Kneser, Ulrich

AU - Hundeshagen, Gabriel

N1 - © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - In sepsis and burns, ascorbic acid (AA) is hypothesized advantageous during volume resuscitation. There is uncertainty regarding its safety and dosing. This study evaluated high dose AA (HDAA: 66 mg/kg/h for 24 hours) versus low dose AA (LDAA: 3.5 g/days) administration during the first 24 hours in severely burned adults. We conducted a retrospective study comparing fluid administration before and after switching from low dose to HDAA in severely burned adults. A total of 38 adults with burns >20% TBSA, who received either HDAA or LDAA were included in this retrospective study. AA serum concentrations were quantified at 0, 24, and 72 hours postburn. HDAA impact on hemodynamics, acid-base homeostasis, acute kidney injury, vasopressor use, resuscitation fluid requirement, urinary output, and the incidence of adverse effects was evaluated; secondary clinical outcomes were analyzed. AA plasma levels were 10-fold elevated in the LDAA and 150-fold elevated in the HDAA group at 24 hours and decreased in both groups afterwards. HDAA was not associated with a significantly increased risk of any complications. A significant reduction in colloid fluid requirements was noted (LDAA: 947 ± 1722 ml/24 hours vs HDAA: 278 ± 667 ml/24 hours, P = 0.029). Other hemodynamic and resuscitation measures, as well as secondary clinical outcomes were comparable between groups. HDAA was associated with higher AA levels and lower volumes of colloids in adults with severe burns. The rate of adverse events was not significantly higher in patients treated with HDAA. Future studies should consider prolonged administration of AA.

AB - In sepsis and burns, ascorbic acid (AA) is hypothesized advantageous during volume resuscitation. There is uncertainty regarding its safety and dosing. This study evaluated high dose AA (HDAA: 66 mg/kg/h for 24 hours) versus low dose AA (LDAA: 3.5 g/days) administration during the first 24 hours in severely burned adults. We conducted a retrospective study comparing fluid administration before and after switching from low dose to HDAA in severely burned adults. A total of 38 adults with burns >20% TBSA, who received either HDAA or LDAA were included in this retrospective study. AA serum concentrations were quantified at 0, 24, and 72 hours postburn. HDAA impact on hemodynamics, acid-base homeostasis, acute kidney injury, vasopressor use, resuscitation fluid requirement, urinary output, and the incidence of adverse effects was evaluated; secondary clinical outcomes were analyzed. AA plasma levels were 10-fold elevated in the LDAA and 150-fold elevated in the HDAA group at 24 hours and decreased in both groups afterwards. HDAA was not associated with a significantly increased risk of any complications. A significant reduction in colloid fluid requirements was noted (LDAA: 947 ± 1722 ml/24 hours vs HDAA: 278 ± 667 ml/24 hours, P = 0.029). Other hemodynamic and resuscitation measures, as well as secondary clinical outcomes were comparable between groups. HDAA was associated with higher AA levels and lower volumes of colloids in adults with severe burns. The rate of adverse events was not significantly higher in patients treated with HDAA. Future studies should consider prolonged administration of AA.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Antioxidants/administration & dosage

KW - Ascorbic Acid/administration & dosage

KW - Burns/complications

KW - Colloids/administration & dosage

KW - Creatinine/analysis

KW - Dose-Response Relationship, Drug

KW - Female

KW - Fluid Therapy

KW - Humans

KW - Infusions, Intravenous

KW - Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Renal Replacement Therapy/statistics & numerical data

KW - Resuscitation

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Shock/etiology

KW - Urine

KW - Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1093/jbcr/iraa041

DO - 10.1093/jbcr/iraa041

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32141505

VL - 41

SP - 871

EP - 877

JO - Journal of Burn Care and Research

JF - Journal of Burn Care and Research

SN - 1559-047X

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 329563719