Safety, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of High- Versus Low-Dose Ascorbic Acid in Severely Burned Adults
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Safety, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of High- Versus Low-Dose Ascorbic Acid in Severely Burned Adults. / Nagel, Sarah Sophie; Radu, Christian Andreas; Kremer, Thomas; Meess, David; Horter, Johannes; Ziegler, Benjamin; Hirche, Christoph; Schmidt, Volker Juergen; Kneser, Ulrich; Hundeshagen, Gabriel.
I: Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, Bind 41, Nr. 4, 2020, s. 871-877.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of High- Versus Low-Dose Ascorbic Acid in Severely Burned Adults
AU - Nagel, Sarah Sophie
AU - Radu, Christian Andreas
AU - Kremer, Thomas
AU - Meess, David
AU - Horter, Johannes
AU - Ziegler, Benjamin
AU - Hirche, Christoph
AU - Schmidt, Volker Juergen
AU - Kneser, Ulrich
AU - Hundeshagen, Gabriel
N1 - © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In sepsis and burns, ascorbic acid (AA) is hypothesized advantageous during volume resuscitation. There is uncertainty regarding its safety and dosing. This study evaluated high dose AA (HDAA: 66 mg/kg/h for 24 hours) versus low dose AA (LDAA: 3.5 g/days) administration during the first 24 hours in severely burned adults. We conducted a retrospective study comparing fluid administration before and after switching from low dose to HDAA in severely burned adults. A total of 38 adults with burns >20% TBSA, who received either HDAA or LDAA were included in this retrospective study. AA serum concentrations were quantified at 0, 24, and 72 hours postburn. HDAA impact on hemodynamics, acid-base homeostasis, acute kidney injury, vasopressor use, resuscitation fluid requirement, urinary output, and the incidence of adverse effects was evaluated; secondary clinical outcomes were analyzed. AA plasma levels were 10-fold elevated in the LDAA and 150-fold elevated in the HDAA group at 24 hours and decreased in both groups afterwards. HDAA was not associated with a significantly increased risk of any complications. A significant reduction in colloid fluid requirements was noted (LDAA: 947 ± 1722 ml/24 hours vs HDAA: 278 ± 667 ml/24 hours, P = 0.029). Other hemodynamic and resuscitation measures, as well as secondary clinical outcomes were comparable between groups. HDAA was associated with higher AA levels and lower volumes of colloids in adults with severe burns. The rate of adverse events was not significantly higher in patients treated with HDAA. Future studies should consider prolonged administration of AA.
AB - In sepsis and burns, ascorbic acid (AA) is hypothesized advantageous during volume resuscitation. There is uncertainty regarding its safety and dosing. This study evaluated high dose AA (HDAA: 66 mg/kg/h for 24 hours) versus low dose AA (LDAA: 3.5 g/days) administration during the first 24 hours in severely burned adults. We conducted a retrospective study comparing fluid administration before and after switching from low dose to HDAA in severely burned adults. A total of 38 adults with burns >20% TBSA, who received either HDAA or LDAA were included in this retrospective study. AA serum concentrations were quantified at 0, 24, and 72 hours postburn. HDAA impact on hemodynamics, acid-base homeostasis, acute kidney injury, vasopressor use, resuscitation fluid requirement, urinary output, and the incidence of adverse effects was evaluated; secondary clinical outcomes were analyzed. AA plasma levels were 10-fold elevated in the LDAA and 150-fold elevated in the HDAA group at 24 hours and decreased in both groups afterwards. HDAA was not associated with a significantly increased risk of any complications. A significant reduction in colloid fluid requirements was noted (LDAA: 947 ± 1722 ml/24 hours vs HDAA: 278 ± 667 ml/24 hours, P = 0.029). Other hemodynamic and resuscitation measures, as well as secondary clinical outcomes were comparable between groups. HDAA was associated with higher AA levels and lower volumes of colloids in adults with severe burns. The rate of adverse events was not significantly higher in patients treated with HDAA. Future studies should consider prolonged administration of AA.
KW - Adolescent
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Antioxidants/administration & dosage
KW - Ascorbic Acid/administration & dosage
KW - Burns/complications
KW - Colloids/administration & dosage
KW - Creatinine/analysis
KW - Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
KW - Female
KW - Fluid Therapy
KW - Humans
KW - Infusions, Intravenous
KW - Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Renal Replacement Therapy/statistics & numerical data
KW - Resuscitation
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Shock/etiology
KW - Urine
KW - Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use
KW - Young Adult
U2 - 10.1093/jbcr/iraa041
DO - 10.1093/jbcr/iraa041
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 32141505
VL - 41
SP - 871
EP - 877
JO - Journal of Burn Care and Research
JF - Journal of Burn Care and Research
SN - 1559-047X
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 329563719