Reproductive history and prognosis of primary breast cancer

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Reproductive history and prognosis of primary breast cancer. / Kroman, Niels T.; Mouridsen, Henning; Melbye, Mads.

I: Ugeskrift for Laeger, Bind 163, Nr. 38, 17.09.2001, s. 5208-5209.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Kroman, NT, Mouridsen, H & Melbye, M 2001, 'Reproductive history and prognosis of primary breast cancer', Ugeskrift for Laeger, bind 163, nr. 38, s. 5208-5209.

APA

Kroman, N. T., Mouridsen, H., & Melbye, M. (2001). Reproductive history and prognosis of primary breast cancer. Ugeskrift for Laeger, 163(38), 5208-5209.

Vancouver

Kroman NT, Mouridsen H, Melbye M. Reproductive history and prognosis of primary breast cancer. Ugeskrift for Laeger. 2001 sep. 17;163(38):5208-5209.

Author

Kroman, Niels T. ; Mouridsen, Henning ; Melbye, Mads. / Reproductive history and prognosis of primary breast cancer. I: Ugeskrift for Laeger. 2001 ; Bind 163, Nr. 38. s. 5208-5209.

Bibtex

@article{32edff0240af4767a8c7e2e15054efdd,
title = "Reproductive history and prognosis of primary breast cancer",
abstract = "The aetiological impact of a woman's reproductive history on breast cancer is well established, whereas the prognostic influence of the reproductive pattern is less well described. A literature search with focus on three Danish studies is described. Status as parous/nulliparous and number of births appear to have no prognostic influence. Women who have their first child at an early age have a lower survival than women who have postponed their first childbirth. This may eventually be explained by selection, i.e. that women with an early first full-term pregnancy represent a group with a more malignant disease. Women diagnosed in the first two years after childbirth have a significantly lower survival, probably because the cancer, being subclinical during pregnancy, is affected by the high oestrogen concentrations with aggressive growth as the outcome. Pregnancy after treatment of breast cancer does not appear to have a negative influence on the prognosis.",
author = "Kroman, {Niels T.} and Henning Mouridsen and Mads Melbye",
year = "2001",
month = sep,
day = "17",
language = "English",
volume = "163",
pages = "5208--5209",
journal = "Ugeskrift for Laeger",
issn = "0041-5782",
publisher = "Almindelige Danske Laegeforening",
number = "38",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproductive history and prognosis of primary breast cancer

AU - Kroman, Niels T.

AU - Mouridsen, Henning

AU - Melbye, Mads

PY - 2001/9/17

Y1 - 2001/9/17

N2 - The aetiological impact of a woman's reproductive history on breast cancer is well established, whereas the prognostic influence of the reproductive pattern is less well described. A literature search with focus on three Danish studies is described. Status as parous/nulliparous and number of births appear to have no prognostic influence. Women who have their first child at an early age have a lower survival than women who have postponed their first childbirth. This may eventually be explained by selection, i.e. that women with an early first full-term pregnancy represent a group with a more malignant disease. Women diagnosed in the first two years after childbirth have a significantly lower survival, probably because the cancer, being subclinical during pregnancy, is affected by the high oestrogen concentrations with aggressive growth as the outcome. Pregnancy after treatment of breast cancer does not appear to have a negative influence on the prognosis.

AB - The aetiological impact of a woman's reproductive history on breast cancer is well established, whereas the prognostic influence of the reproductive pattern is less well described. A literature search with focus on three Danish studies is described. Status as parous/nulliparous and number of births appear to have no prognostic influence. Women who have their first child at an early age have a lower survival than women who have postponed their first childbirth. This may eventually be explained by selection, i.e. that women with an early first full-term pregnancy represent a group with a more malignant disease. Women diagnosed in the first two years after childbirth have a significantly lower survival, probably because the cancer, being subclinical during pregnancy, is affected by the high oestrogen concentrations with aggressive growth as the outcome. Pregnancy after treatment of breast cancer does not appear to have a negative influence on the prognosis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0040750657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 11577528

AN - SCOPUS:0040750657

VL - 163

SP - 5208

EP - 5209

JO - Ugeskrift for Laeger

JF - Ugeskrift for Laeger

SN - 0041-5782

IS - 38

ER -

ID: 259822266