Relevant distinctions in relation to explainability in the public sector
Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Konferencebidrag i proceedings › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
This paper argues that jurisprudence can offer a relevant contribution to the international debate on the use of artificial intelligence in the public sector. From a legal perspective, a distinction can and should be made between two types of AI-based solutions, namely fact-producing and those that represent a transformation of norms (legislation). Under Danish Administrative Law, mainly the latter solutions must be fully explainable. This distinction might be relevant for other disciplines than jurisprudence and be a contribution to the internationally debated hot topic of whether transparency must be ensured via ethical principles or regulation.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Titel | Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, ECIAIR 2020 |
Redaktører | Florinda Matos |
Antal sider | 7 |
Forlag | Academic Conferences and Publishing International |
Publikationsdato | 2020 |
Sider | 86-92 |
ISBN (Elektronisk) | 9781912764747 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - 2020 |
Begivenhed | 2nd European Conference on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, ECIAIR 2020 - Lisbon, Portugal Varighed: 22 okt. 2020 → 23 okt. 2020 |
Konference
Konference | 2nd European Conference on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, ECIAIR 2020 |
---|---|
Land | Portugal |
By | Lisbon |
Periode | 22/10/2020 → 23/10/2020 |
Navn | Proceedings of the European Conference on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, ECIAIR 2020 |
---|
ID: 255729589