Recognition of visual symptoms in stroke: a challenge to patients, bystanders, and Emergency Medical Services
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Recognition of visual symptoms in stroke : a challenge to patients, bystanders, and Emergency Medical Services. / Berg, Kristina Parsberg; Sørensen, Viktor Frederik Idin; Blomberg, Stig Nikolaj Fasmer; Christensen, Helle Collatz; Kruuse, Christina.
I: BMC Emergency Medicine, Bind 23, Nr. 1, 96, 2023.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Recognition of visual symptoms in stroke
T2 - a challenge to patients, bystanders, and Emergency Medical Services
AU - Berg, Kristina Parsberg
AU - Sørensen, Viktor Frederik Idin
AU - Blomberg, Stig Nikolaj Fasmer
AU - Christensen, Helle Collatz
AU - Kruuse, Christina
N1 - Funding Information: Open access funding provided by Royal Library, Copenhagen University Library. HCC and SNFB were funded by TrygFonden, VFIS by Herlev Gentofte Hospital Research Fund, and CK by Novo Nordisk Fonden grant NNF18OC0031840. Publisher Copyright: © 2023, BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Identification of visual symptoms as a sign of acute stroke can be challenging for both first line healthcare professionals and lay persons. Failed recognition of visual symptoms by medical dispatchers at the Emergency Medical Dispatch Center (EMDC-112) or personnel at the Out-of-Hours Health Service (OOHS) may delay stroke revascularization. We aimed to identify correct system response to visual symptoms in emergency calls. Methods: Phone calls from patient or bystander to the EMDC-112 or OOHS, which included visual symptoms on patients later verified with stroke/Transient ischemic attack (TIA) diagnosis, were analyzed. Data were stratified according to hospitalization within and after 4.5 h from symptom onset. Descriptive and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed. Results: Of 517 calls identified, 290 calls fulfilled inclusion criteria. Only 30% of the patients received correct visitation by the medical dispatchers and referral to the hospital by a high-priority ambulance. Correct visitation was associated with early contact (adjusted OR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.11, 5.03), contact to the EMDC-112 (adjusted OR: 3.18, 95% CI: 1.80, 5.62), and when the medical dispatcher asked additional questions on typical stroke symptoms (adjusted OR: 6.36, 95% CI: 3.01, 13.43). No specific visual symptom was associated with stroke recognition and fast hospitalization. Conclusions: First line healthcare professionals had significant problems in identifying visual symptoms as a sign of acute stroke and eliciting correct response. This highlights an urgent need to improve knowledge of visual symptoms in acute stroke and emphasize correct response to stroke symptoms in general.
AB - Background: Identification of visual symptoms as a sign of acute stroke can be challenging for both first line healthcare professionals and lay persons. Failed recognition of visual symptoms by medical dispatchers at the Emergency Medical Dispatch Center (EMDC-112) or personnel at the Out-of-Hours Health Service (OOHS) may delay stroke revascularization. We aimed to identify correct system response to visual symptoms in emergency calls. Methods: Phone calls from patient or bystander to the EMDC-112 or OOHS, which included visual symptoms on patients later verified with stroke/Transient ischemic attack (TIA) diagnosis, were analyzed. Data were stratified according to hospitalization within and after 4.5 h from symptom onset. Descriptive and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed. Results: Of 517 calls identified, 290 calls fulfilled inclusion criteria. Only 30% of the patients received correct visitation by the medical dispatchers and referral to the hospital by a high-priority ambulance. Correct visitation was associated with early contact (adjusted OR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.11, 5.03), contact to the EMDC-112 (adjusted OR: 3.18, 95% CI: 1.80, 5.62), and when the medical dispatcher asked additional questions on typical stroke symptoms (adjusted OR: 6.36, 95% CI: 3.01, 13.43). No specific visual symptom was associated with stroke recognition and fast hospitalization. Conclusions: First line healthcare professionals had significant problems in identifying visual symptoms as a sign of acute stroke and eliciting correct response. This highlights an urgent need to improve knowledge of visual symptoms in acute stroke and emphasize correct response to stroke symptoms in general.
KW - Emergency Medical Services; stroke recognition
KW - Prehospital
KW - Stroke
KW - Visual symptoms
U2 - 10.1186/s12873-023-00870-2
DO - 10.1186/s12873-023-00870-2
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37626329
AN - SCOPUS:85168722962
VL - 23
JO - BMC Emergency Medicine
JF - BMC Emergency Medicine
SN - 1471-227X
IS - 1
M1 - 96
ER -
ID: 374125286