Recognition of patient-reported impairment in oral aesthetics

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Recognition of patient-reported impairment in oral aesthetics. / Dannemand Jensen, Katrine; Øzhayat, Esben Boeskov.

I: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, Bind 41, Nr. 9, 2014, s. 692-99.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Dannemand Jensen, K & Øzhayat, EB 2014, 'Recognition of patient-reported impairment in oral aesthetics', Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, bind 41, nr. 9, s. 692-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12183

APA

Dannemand Jensen, K., & Øzhayat, E. B. (2014). Recognition of patient-reported impairment in oral aesthetics. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 41(9), 692-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12183

Vancouver

Dannemand Jensen K, Øzhayat EB. Recognition of patient-reported impairment in oral aesthetics. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2014;41(9):692-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12183

Author

Dannemand Jensen, Katrine ; Øzhayat, Esben Boeskov. / Recognition of patient-reported impairment in oral aesthetics. I: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2014 ; Bind 41, Nr. 9. s. 692-99.

Bibtex

@article{da800a6c7ef042c4b7f0804272b97624,
title = "Recognition of patient-reported impairment in oral aesthetics",
abstract = "Objective: The objectives of this study were to investigate the degree of effective recognition by professionals of patient-estimated oral esthetic impairment and the most reliable aspects in such recognition. Methods: Participants consisted of 95 patients with partial dentition in need of prosthodontic replacements. The oral esthetics was professionally evaluated using the Prosthetic Esthetic Index (PEI), compiling 13 different esthetic aspects and an overall evaluation. The patient-reported impairment was evaluated using the Oral Health Impact Profile Aesthetic (OHIP-Aes) and the Oral Esthetic Scale (OES). Background variables were: gender, age, work-situation, education-level, marital status, number and location of teeth, wearing a removable dental prosthesis (RDP), and smile line. Results: A significant correlation was found between the overall professional evaluation and the OHIP-Aes score (R=0.43, p<0.05), the OES score (R=0.46, p<0.05) and the overall patient evaluation (0.35, p<0.05). Correlations between the 13 specific aspects of the PEI with the patient-reported evaluations were generally small to moderate: the aspect {\textquoteleft}discoloration of the teeth{\textquoteright} showed the highest correlation. The multivariate analyses showed that up to 57 % of the patient-reported impairment could be explained by the professionally evaluated oral esthetic in combination with background variables. Discoloration of the teeth was the greatest explanatory variable, but also dental arch symmetry, and position and color of the teeth was significant aspects. Conclusion: A high percentage of the patient-reported esthetic impairment can be recognized by the professionals. The most reliable aspect is discoloration of the teeth, but also dental arch symmetry, and the position and color of the teeth are important for recognizing the esthetic impairment.",
author = "{Dannemand Jensen}, Katrine and {\O}zhayat, {Esben Boeskov}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/joor.12183",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "692--99",
journal = "Journal of Oral Rehabilitation",
issn = "0305-182X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recognition of patient-reported impairment in oral aesthetics

AU - Dannemand Jensen, Katrine

AU - Øzhayat, Esben Boeskov

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective: The objectives of this study were to investigate the degree of effective recognition by professionals of patient-estimated oral esthetic impairment and the most reliable aspects in such recognition. Methods: Participants consisted of 95 patients with partial dentition in need of prosthodontic replacements. The oral esthetics was professionally evaluated using the Prosthetic Esthetic Index (PEI), compiling 13 different esthetic aspects and an overall evaluation. The patient-reported impairment was evaluated using the Oral Health Impact Profile Aesthetic (OHIP-Aes) and the Oral Esthetic Scale (OES). Background variables were: gender, age, work-situation, education-level, marital status, number and location of teeth, wearing a removable dental prosthesis (RDP), and smile line. Results: A significant correlation was found between the overall professional evaluation and the OHIP-Aes score (R=0.43, p<0.05), the OES score (R=0.46, p<0.05) and the overall patient evaluation (0.35, p<0.05). Correlations between the 13 specific aspects of the PEI with the patient-reported evaluations were generally small to moderate: the aspect ‘discoloration of the teeth’ showed the highest correlation. The multivariate analyses showed that up to 57 % of the patient-reported impairment could be explained by the professionally evaluated oral esthetic in combination with background variables. Discoloration of the teeth was the greatest explanatory variable, but also dental arch symmetry, and position and color of the teeth was significant aspects. Conclusion: A high percentage of the patient-reported esthetic impairment can be recognized by the professionals. The most reliable aspect is discoloration of the teeth, but also dental arch symmetry, and the position and color of the teeth are important for recognizing the esthetic impairment.

AB - Objective: The objectives of this study were to investigate the degree of effective recognition by professionals of patient-estimated oral esthetic impairment and the most reliable aspects in such recognition. Methods: Participants consisted of 95 patients with partial dentition in need of prosthodontic replacements. The oral esthetics was professionally evaluated using the Prosthetic Esthetic Index (PEI), compiling 13 different esthetic aspects and an overall evaluation. The patient-reported impairment was evaluated using the Oral Health Impact Profile Aesthetic (OHIP-Aes) and the Oral Esthetic Scale (OES). Background variables were: gender, age, work-situation, education-level, marital status, number and location of teeth, wearing a removable dental prosthesis (RDP), and smile line. Results: A significant correlation was found between the overall professional evaluation and the OHIP-Aes score (R=0.43, p<0.05), the OES score (R=0.46, p<0.05) and the overall patient evaluation (0.35, p<0.05). Correlations between the 13 specific aspects of the PEI with the patient-reported evaluations were generally small to moderate: the aspect ‘discoloration of the teeth’ showed the highest correlation. The multivariate analyses showed that up to 57 % of the patient-reported impairment could be explained by the professionally evaluated oral esthetic in combination with background variables. Discoloration of the teeth was the greatest explanatory variable, but also dental arch symmetry, and position and color of the teeth was significant aspects. Conclusion: A high percentage of the patient-reported esthetic impairment can be recognized by the professionals. The most reliable aspect is discoloration of the teeth, but also dental arch symmetry, and the position and color of the teeth are important for recognizing the esthetic impairment.

U2 - 10.1111/joor.12183

DO - 10.1111/joor.12183

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24836917

VL - 41

SP - 692

EP - 699

JO - Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

SN - 0305-182X

IS - 9

ER -

ID: 110215648