Properties of embryoid bodies

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Properties of embryoid bodies. / Brickman, Joshua M; Serup, Palle.

I: Developmental Biology, Bind 6, Nr. 2, e259, 02.2017.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Brickman, JM & Serup, P 2017, 'Properties of embryoid bodies', Developmental Biology, bind 6, nr. 2, e259. https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.259

APA

Brickman, J. M., & Serup, P. (2017). Properties of embryoid bodies. Developmental Biology, 6(2), [e259]. https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.259

Vancouver

Brickman JM, Serup P. Properties of embryoid bodies. Developmental Biology. 2017 feb.;6(2). e259. https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.259

Author

Brickman, Joshua M ; Serup, Palle. / Properties of embryoid bodies. I: Developmental Biology. 2017 ; Bind 6, Nr. 2.

Bibtex

@article{754e0a7d862b4fd68d36348a9c3011c0,
title = "Properties of embryoid bodies",
abstract = "Embryoid bodies (EBs) have been popular in vitro differentiation models for pluripotent stem cells for more than five decades. Initially, defined as aggregates formed by embryonal carcinoma cells, EBs gained more prominence after the derivation of karyotypically normal embryonic stem cells from early mouse blastocysts. In many cases, formation of EBs constitutes an important initial step in directed differentiation protocols aimed at generated specific cell types from undifferentiated stem cells. Indeed state-of-the-art protocols for directed differentiation of cardiomyocytes still rely on this initial EB step. Analyses of spontaneous differentiation of embryonic stem cells in EBs have yielded important insights into the molecules that direct primitive endoderm differentiation and many of the lessons we have learned about the signals and transcription factors governing this differentiation event is owed to EB models, which later were extensively validated in studies of early mouse embryos. EBs show a degree of self-organization that mimics some aspects of early embryonic development, but with important exceptions. Recent studies that employ modern signaling reporters and tracers of lineage commitment have revealed both the strengths and the weaknesses of EBs as a model of embryonic axis formation. In this review, we discuss the history, application, and future potential of EBs as an experimental model. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.",
author = "Brickman, {Joshua M} and Palle Serup",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.",
year = "2017",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1002/wdev.259",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "Developmental Biology",
issn = "0012-1606",
publisher = "Academic Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Properties of embryoid bodies

AU - Brickman, Joshua M

AU - Serup, Palle

N1 - © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

PY - 2017/2

Y1 - 2017/2

N2 - Embryoid bodies (EBs) have been popular in vitro differentiation models for pluripotent stem cells for more than five decades. Initially, defined as aggregates formed by embryonal carcinoma cells, EBs gained more prominence after the derivation of karyotypically normal embryonic stem cells from early mouse blastocysts. In many cases, formation of EBs constitutes an important initial step in directed differentiation protocols aimed at generated specific cell types from undifferentiated stem cells. Indeed state-of-the-art protocols for directed differentiation of cardiomyocytes still rely on this initial EB step. Analyses of spontaneous differentiation of embryonic stem cells in EBs have yielded important insights into the molecules that direct primitive endoderm differentiation and many of the lessons we have learned about the signals and transcription factors governing this differentiation event is owed to EB models, which later were extensively validated in studies of early mouse embryos. EBs show a degree of self-organization that mimics some aspects of early embryonic development, but with important exceptions. Recent studies that employ modern signaling reporters and tracers of lineage commitment have revealed both the strengths and the weaknesses of EBs as a model of embryonic axis formation. In this review, we discuss the history, application, and future potential of EBs as an experimental model. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

AB - Embryoid bodies (EBs) have been popular in vitro differentiation models for pluripotent stem cells for more than five decades. Initially, defined as aggregates formed by embryonal carcinoma cells, EBs gained more prominence after the derivation of karyotypically normal embryonic stem cells from early mouse blastocysts. In many cases, formation of EBs constitutes an important initial step in directed differentiation protocols aimed at generated specific cell types from undifferentiated stem cells. Indeed state-of-the-art protocols for directed differentiation of cardiomyocytes still rely on this initial EB step. Analyses of spontaneous differentiation of embryonic stem cells in EBs have yielded important insights into the molecules that direct primitive endoderm differentiation and many of the lessons we have learned about the signals and transcription factors governing this differentiation event is owed to EB models, which later were extensively validated in studies of early mouse embryos. EBs show a degree of self-organization that mimics some aspects of early embryonic development, but with important exceptions. Recent studies that employ modern signaling reporters and tracers of lineage commitment have revealed both the strengths and the weaknesses of EBs as a model of embryonic axis formation. In this review, we discuss the history, application, and future potential of EBs as an experimental model. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

U2 - 10.1002/wdev.259

DO - 10.1002/wdev.259

M3 - Review

C2 - 27911036

VL - 6

JO - Developmental Biology

JF - Developmental Biology

SN - 0012-1606

IS - 2

M1 - e259

ER -

ID: 172478748