Prognostic clinical and molecular biomarkers of renal disease in type 2 diabetes
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Prognostic clinical and molecular biomarkers of renal disease in type 2 diabetes. / Pena, Michelle J; de Zeeuw, Dick; Mischak, Harald; Jankowski, Joachim; Oberbauer, Rainer; Woloszczuk, Wolfgang; Benner, Jacqueline; Dallmann, Guido; Mayer, Bernd; Mayer, Gert; Rossing, Peter; Lambers Heerspink, Hiddo J.
I: Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, Bind 30, Nr. Suppl 4, 08.2015, s. iv86-95.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic clinical and molecular biomarkers of renal disease in type 2 diabetes
AU - Pena, Michelle J
AU - de Zeeuw, Dick
AU - Mischak, Harald
AU - Jankowski, Joachim
AU - Oberbauer, Rainer
AU - Woloszczuk, Wolfgang
AU - Benner, Jacqueline
AU - Dallmann, Guido
AU - Mayer, Bernd
AU - Mayer, Gert
AU - Rossing, Peter
AU - Lambers Heerspink, Hiddo J
N1 - © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/8
Y1 - 2015/8
N2 - Diabetic kidney disease occurs in ∼ 25-40% of patients with type 2 diabetes. Given the high risk of progressive renal function loss and end-stage renal disease, early identification of patients with a renal risk is important. Novel biomarkers may aid in improving renal risk stratification. In this review, we first focus on the classical panel of albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate as the primary clinical predictors of renal disease and then move our attention to novel biomarkers, primarily concentrating on assay-based multiple/panel biomarkers, proteomics biomarkers and metabolomics biomarkers. We focus on multiple biomarker panels since the molecular processes of renal disease progression in type 2 diabetes are heterogeneous, rendering it unlikely that a single biomarker significantly adds to clinical risk prediction. A limited number of prospective studies of multiple biomarkers address the predictive performance of novel biomarker panels in addition to the classical panel in type 2 diabetes. However, the prospective studies conducted so far have small sample sizes, are insufficiently powered and lack external validation. Adequately sized validation studies of multiple biomarker panels are thus required. There is also a paucity of studies that assess the effect of treatments on novel biomarker panels and determine whether initial treatment-induced changes in novel biomarkers predict changes in long-term renal outcomes. Such studies can not only improve our healthcare but also our understanding of the mechanisms of actions of existing and novel drugs and may yield biomarkers that can be used to monitor drug response. We conclude that this will be an area to focus research on in the future.
AB - Diabetic kidney disease occurs in ∼ 25-40% of patients with type 2 diabetes. Given the high risk of progressive renal function loss and end-stage renal disease, early identification of patients with a renal risk is important. Novel biomarkers may aid in improving renal risk stratification. In this review, we first focus on the classical panel of albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate as the primary clinical predictors of renal disease and then move our attention to novel biomarkers, primarily concentrating on assay-based multiple/panel biomarkers, proteomics biomarkers and metabolomics biomarkers. We focus on multiple biomarker panels since the molecular processes of renal disease progression in type 2 diabetes are heterogeneous, rendering it unlikely that a single biomarker significantly adds to clinical risk prediction. A limited number of prospective studies of multiple biomarkers address the predictive performance of novel biomarker panels in addition to the classical panel in type 2 diabetes. However, the prospective studies conducted so far have small sample sizes, are insufficiently powered and lack external validation. Adequately sized validation studies of multiple biomarker panels are thus required. There is also a paucity of studies that assess the effect of treatments on novel biomarker panels and determine whether initial treatment-induced changes in novel biomarkers predict changes in long-term renal outcomes. Such studies can not only improve our healthcare but also our understanding of the mechanisms of actions of existing and novel drugs and may yield biomarkers that can be used to monitor drug response. We conclude that this will be an area to focus research on in the future.
U2 - 10.1093/ndt/gfv252
DO - 10.1093/ndt/gfv252
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 26209743
VL - 30
SP - iv86-95
JO - Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation
JF - Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation
SN - 0931-0509
IS - Suppl 4
ER -
ID: 150708941