Probabilistic SNP genotyping at low DNA concentrations
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Probabilistic SNP genotyping at low DNA concentrations. / Nielsen, M. B.; Andersen, M. M.; Eriksen, P. S.; Mogensen, H. S.; Morling, N.
I: Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series, Bind 8, 2022, s. 151-152.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Probabilistic SNP genotyping at low DNA concentrations
AU - Nielsen, M. B.
AU - Andersen, M. M.
AU - Eriksen, P. S.
AU - Mogensen, H. S.
AU - Morling, N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - We present a statistical method for biallelic SNP genotyping that reduces the risk of wrong SNP calls and gives fewer no-calls. The method uses a symmetric multinomial logistic regression model with an intuitive graphical interpretation. Its probabilistic nature gives the user control over the accepted risk through the estimated genotype probabilities. We compared the performance of our method with the HID SNP Genotyper v.4.3.1 plug-in (HSG) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the additional criteria of the University of Copenhagen (UCPH) through a series of six DNA dilutions from 500 pg to 16 pg DNA. The HSG method made wrong calls from 62.5 pg DNA and below, while the UCPH method made wrong calls at 16 pg DNA. Our method allowed SNP genotyping of 16 pg DNA without making wrong calls. Depending on the DNA dilution, our method also reduced the number of no-calls by 70–96 % compared to UCPH method and 59–69 % compared to the HSG method. Our method can be used for any biallelic genotyping.
AB - We present a statistical method for biallelic SNP genotyping that reduces the risk of wrong SNP calls and gives fewer no-calls. The method uses a symmetric multinomial logistic regression model with an intuitive graphical interpretation. Its probabilistic nature gives the user control over the accepted risk through the estimated genotype probabilities. We compared the performance of our method with the HID SNP Genotyper v.4.3.1 plug-in (HSG) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the additional criteria of the University of Copenhagen (UCPH) through a series of six DNA dilutions from 500 pg to 16 pg DNA. The HSG method made wrong calls from 62.5 pg DNA and below, while the UCPH method made wrong calls at 16 pg DNA. Our method allowed SNP genotyping of 16 pg DNA without making wrong calls. Depending on the DNA dilution, our method also reduced the number of no-calls by 70–96 % compared to UCPH method and 59–69 % compared to the HSG method. Our method can be used for any biallelic genotyping.
KW - AIMs
KW - Biallelic markers
KW - HID SNP Genotyper
KW - Low DNA concentrations
KW - Massively parallel sequencing
KW - Multinomial logistic regression
U2 - 10.1016/j.fsigss.2022.10.017
DO - 10.1016/j.fsigss.2022.10.017
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85144245711
VL - 8
SP - 151
EP - 152
JO - Forensic Science International: Genetics. Supplement Series
JF - Forensic Science International: Genetics. Supplement Series
SN - 1875-1768
ER -
ID: 330780392