Piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems for patients with bacterial infection: Protocol for a systematic review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems for patients with bacterial infection : Protocol for a systematic review. / Petersen, Marie Warrer; Perner, Anders; Sjövall, Fredrik; Jonsson, Andreas Bender; Steensen, Morten; Andersen, Jakob Steen; Achiam, Michael Patrick; Frimodt-Møller, Niels; Møller, Morten Hylander.

I: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Bind 63, Nr. 7, 08.2019, s. 973-978.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Petersen, MW, Perner, A, Sjövall, F, Jonsson, AB, Steensen, M, Andersen, JS, Achiam, MP, Frimodt-Møller, N & Møller, MH 2019, 'Piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems for patients with bacterial infection: Protocol for a systematic review', Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, bind 63, nr. 7, s. 973-978. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13382

APA

Petersen, M. W., Perner, A., Sjövall, F., Jonsson, A. B., Steensen, M., Andersen, J. S., Achiam, M. P., Frimodt-Møller, N., & Møller, M. H. (2019). Piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems for patients with bacterial infection: Protocol for a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 63(7), 973-978. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13382

Vancouver

Petersen MW, Perner A, Sjövall F, Jonsson AB, Steensen M, Andersen JS o.a. Piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems for patients with bacterial infection: Protocol for a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2019 aug.;63(7):973-978. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13382

Author

Petersen, Marie Warrer ; Perner, Anders ; Sjövall, Fredrik ; Jonsson, Andreas Bender ; Steensen, Morten ; Andersen, Jakob Steen ; Achiam, Michael Patrick ; Frimodt-Møller, Niels ; Møller, Morten Hylander. / Piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems for patients with bacterial infection : Protocol for a systematic review. I: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2019 ; Bind 63, Nr. 7. s. 973-978.

Bibtex

@article{7410fc6237ab4f7aaca73be4cd16920f,
title = "Piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems for patients with bacterial infection: Protocol for a systematic review",
abstract = "Introduction: Early empirical broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy is recommended for patients with severe infections, including sepsis. β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations or carbapenems are often used to ensure coverage of likely pathogens. Piperacillin/tazobactam is proposed as a carbapenem-sparing agent to reduce the incidence of multidrug-resistant bacteria and superinfections. In the recently published MERINO trial, increased mortality from piperacillin/tazobactam was suggested in patients with bacteraemia with resistant Escherichia coli or Klebsiella species. Whether these findings also apply to empirical piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with other severe infections, including sepsis, is unknown. We aim to assess the benefits and harms of empirical and definitive piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems for patients with severe bacterial infections. Methods and analysis: This protocol has been prepared according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement, the Cochrane Handbook and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We will include randomised clinical trials assessing piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems in patients with severe bacterial infections of any origin. The primary outcome will be all-cause short-term mortality ≤ 90 days. Secondary outcomes will include all-cause long-term mortality > 90 days, adverse events, quality of life, use of life support, secondary infections, antibiotic resistance, and length of stay. We will conduct meta-analyses, including pre-planned subgroup and sensitivity analyses for all assessed outcomes. The risk of random errors in the meta-analyses will be assessed by trial sequential analysis.",
author = "Petersen, {Marie Warrer} and Anders Perner and Fredrik Sj{\"o}vall and Jonsson, {Andreas Bender} and Morten Steensen and Andersen, {Jakob Steen} and Achiam, {Michael Patrick} and Niels Frimodt-M{\o}ller and M{\o}ller, {Morten Hylander}",
year = "2019",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1111/aas.13382",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "973--978",
journal = "Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-5172",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems for patients with bacterial infection

T2 - Protocol for a systematic review

AU - Petersen, Marie Warrer

AU - Perner, Anders

AU - Sjövall, Fredrik

AU - Jonsson, Andreas Bender

AU - Steensen, Morten

AU - Andersen, Jakob Steen

AU - Achiam, Michael Patrick

AU - Frimodt-Møller, Niels

AU - Møller, Morten Hylander

PY - 2019/8

Y1 - 2019/8

N2 - Introduction: Early empirical broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy is recommended for patients with severe infections, including sepsis. β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations or carbapenems are often used to ensure coverage of likely pathogens. Piperacillin/tazobactam is proposed as a carbapenem-sparing agent to reduce the incidence of multidrug-resistant bacteria and superinfections. In the recently published MERINO trial, increased mortality from piperacillin/tazobactam was suggested in patients with bacteraemia with resistant Escherichia coli or Klebsiella species. Whether these findings also apply to empirical piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with other severe infections, including sepsis, is unknown. We aim to assess the benefits and harms of empirical and definitive piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems for patients with severe bacterial infections. Methods and analysis: This protocol has been prepared according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement, the Cochrane Handbook and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We will include randomised clinical trials assessing piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems in patients with severe bacterial infections of any origin. The primary outcome will be all-cause short-term mortality ≤ 90 days. Secondary outcomes will include all-cause long-term mortality > 90 days, adverse events, quality of life, use of life support, secondary infections, antibiotic resistance, and length of stay. We will conduct meta-analyses, including pre-planned subgroup and sensitivity analyses for all assessed outcomes. The risk of random errors in the meta-analyses will be assessed by trial sequential analysis.

AB - Introduction: Early empirical broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy is recommended for patients with severe infections, including sepsis. β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations or carbapenems are often used to ensure coverage of likely pathogens. Piperacillin/tazobactam is proposed as a carbapenem-sparing agent to reduce the incidence of multidrug-resistant bacteria and superinfections. In the recently published MERINO trial, increased mortality from piperacillin/tazobactam was suggested in patients with bacteraemia with resistant Escherichia coli or Klebsiella species. Whether these findings also apply to empirical piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with other severe infections, including sepsis, is unknown. We aim to assess the benefits and harms of empirical and definitive piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems for patients with severe bacterial infections. Methods and analysis: This protocol has been prepared according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement, the Cochrane Handbook and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We will include randomised clinical trials assessing piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems in patients with severe bacterial infections of any origin. The primary outcome will be all-cause short-term mortality ≤ 90 days. Secondary outcomes will include all-cause long-term mortality > 90 days, adverse events, quality of life, use of life support, secondary infections, antibiotic resistance, and length of stay. We will conduct meta-analyses, including pre-planned subgroup and sensitivity analyses for all assessed outcomes. The risk of random errors in the meta-analyses will be assessed by trial sequential analysis.

U2 - 10.1111/aas.13382

DO - 10.1111/aas.13382

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31020663

AN - SCOPUS:85064919059

VL - 63

SP - 973

EP - 978

JO - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-5172

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 240742790