Physical rehabilitation versus no physical rehabilitation after total hip and knee arthroplasties: Protocol for a pragmatic, randomized, controlled, superiority trial (The DRAW1 trial)

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Physical rehabilitation versus no physical rehabilitation after total hip and knee arthroplasties : Protocol for a pragmatic, randomized, controlled, superiority trial (The DRAW1 trial). / Mark-Christensen, Troels; Thorborg, Kristian; Kallemose, Thomas; Bandholm, Thomas.

I: F1000Research, Bind 10, 146, 2021.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Mark-Christensen, T, Thorborg, K, Kallemose, T & Bandholm, T 2021, 'Physical rehabilitation versus no physical rehabilitation after total hip and knee arthroplasties: Protocol for a pragmatic, randomized, controlled, superiority trial (The DRAW1 trial)', F1000Research, bind 10, 146. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.50814.1

APA

Mark-Christensen, T., Thorborg, K., Kallemose, T., & Bandholm, T. (2021). Physical rehabilitation versus no physical rehabilitation after total hip and knee arthroplasties: Protocol for a pragmatic, randomized, controlled, superiority trial (The DRAW1 trial). F1000Research, 10, [146]. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.50814.1

Vancouver

Mark-Christensen T, Thorborg K, Kallemose T, Bandholm T. Physical rehabilitation versus no physical rehabilitation after total hip and knee arthroplasties: Protocol for a pragmatic, randomized, controlled, superiority trial (The DRAW1 trial). F1000Research. 2021;10. 146. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.50814.1

Author

Mark-Christensen, Troels ; Thorborg, Kristian ; Kallemose, Thomas ; Bandholm, Thomas. / Physical rehabilitation versus no physical rehabilitation after total hip and knee arthroplasties : Protocol for a pragmatic, randomized, controlled, superiority trial (The DRAW1 trial). I: F1000Research. 2021 ; Bind 10.

Bibtex

@article{ca838e78678d48c7ad3b785465d5fb6f,
title = "Physical rehabilitation versus no physical rehabilitation after total hip and knee arthroplasties: Protocol for a pragmatic, randomized, controlled, superiority trial (The DRAW1 trial)",
abstract = "Background: Following total hip- and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA), post-discharge physical rehabilitation is common practice, but varies significantly regarding content, duration, intensity and mode of delivery. Recent systematic reviews have found home-based rehabilitation to be as good as outpatient rehabilitation in terms of pain and physical function. We therefore wonder if physical rehabilitation 'works' at all when compared to no physical rehabilitation after THA and TKA - 'no rehabilitation' defined as no prescribed therapeutic rehabilitation exercises. The purpose of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of home-based telerehabilitation, home-based rehabilitation and no physical rehabilitation following THA and TKA. Methods: This pragmatic, randomized controlled trial will include 168 patients following discharge after THA or TKA, in Bornholm Denmark. Patients will be randomized into one of the three 6-week rehabilitation strategies: home-based telerehabilitation, home-based rehabilitation or no physical rehabilitation. The trial is designed as a superiority trial to test the hypothesis that rehabilitation (home-based telerehabilitation and home-based rehabilitation) is superior to no physical rehabilitation. The primary outcome will be the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)/ the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)-subscale: function of daily living at first follow-up (end of the 6-weeks' intervention). Additional follow-ups are scheduled at 3 and 12 months. Outcome assessors and data analysts are blinded to group allocation. Conclusions: Knowledge about the effectiveness of the three investigated rehabilitation strategies will help guide the future organization of post-discharge rehabilitation after THA and TKA. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03750448 (23/11/2018)",
keywords = "Rehabilitation, Telerehabilitation, Total Hip Arthroplasty, Total Joint Replacement, Total Knee Arthroplasty",
author = "Troels Mark-Christensen and Kristian Thorborg and Thomas Kallemose and Thomas Bandholm",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Mark-Christensen T et al.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.12688/f1000research.50814.1",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "F1000Research",
issn = "2046-1402",
publisher = "F1000Research",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physical rehabilitation versus no physical rehabilitation after total hip and knee arthroplasties

T2 - Protocol for a pragmatic, randomized, controlled, superiority trial (The DRAW1 trial)

AU - Mark-Christensen, Troels

AU - Thorborg, Kristian

AU - Kallemose, Thomas

AU - Bandholm, Thomas

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Mark-Christensen T et al.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Background: Following total hip- and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA), post-discharge physical rehabilitation is common practice, but varies significantly regarding content, duration, intensity and mode of delivery. Recent systematic reviews have found home-based rehabilitation to be as good as outpatient rehabilitation in terms of pain and physical function. We therefore wonder if physical rehabilitation 'works' at all when compared to no physical rehabilitation after THA and TKA - 'no rehabilitation' defined as no prescribed therapeutic rehabilitation exercises. The purpose of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of home-based telerehabilitation, home-based rehabilitation and no physical rehabilitation following THA and TKA. Methods: This pragmatic, randomized controlled trial will include 168 patients following discharge after THA or TKA, in Bornholm Denmark. Patients will be randomized into one of the three 6-week rehabilitation strategies: home-based telerehabilitation, home-based rehabilitation or no physical rehabilitation. The trial is designed as a superiority trial to test the hypothesis that rehabilitation (home-based telerehabilitation and home-based rehabilitation) is superior to no physical rehabilitation. The primary outcome will be the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)/ the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)-subscale: function of daily living at first follow-up (end of the 6-weeks' intervention). Additional follow-ups are scheduled at 3 and 12 months. Outcome assessors and data analysts are blinded to group allocation. Conclusions: Knowledge about the effectiveness of the three investigated rehabilitation strategies will help guide the future organization of post-discharge rehabilitation after THA and TKA. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03750448 (23/11/2018)

AB - Background: Following total hip- and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA), post-discharge physical rehabilitation is common practice, but varies significantly regarding content, duration, intensity and mode of delivery. Recent systematic reviews have found home-based rehabilitation to be as good as outpatient rehabilitation in terms of pain and physical function. We therefore wonder if physical rehabilitation 'works' at all when compared to no physical rehabilitation after THA and TKA - 'no rehabilitation' defined as no prescribed therapeutic rehabilitation exercises. The purpose of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of home-based telerehabilitation, home-based rehabilitation and no physical rehabilitation following THA and TKA. Methods: This pragmatic, randomized controlled trial will include 168 patients following discharge after THA or TKA, in Bornholm Denmark. Patients will be randomized into one of the three 6-week rehabilitation strategies: home-based telerehabilitation, home-based rehabilitation or no physical rehabilitation. The trial is designed as a superiority trial to test the hypothesis that rehabilitation (home-based telerehabilitation and home-based rehabilitation) is superior to no physical rehabilitation. The primary outcome will be the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)/ the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)-subscale: function of daily living at first follow-up (end of the 6-weeks' intervention). Additional follow-ups are scheduled at 3 and 12 months. Outcome assessors and data analysts are blinded to group allocation. Conclusions: Knowledge about the effectiveness of the three investigated rehabilitation strategies will help guide the future organization of post-discharge rehabilitation after THA and TKA. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03750448 (23/11/2018)

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Telerehabilitation

KW - Total Hip Arthroplasty

KW - Total Joint Replacement

KW - Total Knee Arthroplasty

U2 - 10.12688/f1000research.50814.1

DO - 10.12688/f1000research.50814.1

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34316356

AN - SCOPUS:85107558637

VL - 10

JO - F1000Research

JF - F1000Research

SN - 2046-1402

M1 - 146

ER -

ID: 275775736