Patient-reported icd-11 personality disorder severity and dsm-5 level of personality functioning
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Patient-reported icd-11 personality disorder severity and dsm-5 level of personality functioning. / Bach, Bo; Anderson, Jaime L.
I: Journal of Personality Disorders, Bind 34, Nr. 2, 2020, s. 231-249.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient-reported icd-11 personality disorder severity and dsm-5 level of personality functioning
AU - Bach, Bo
AU - Anderson, Jaime L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Guilford Press.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - This study evaluated the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD) proposed for ICD-11 and the Level of Personality Functioning Scale–Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF) developed for DSM-5 Section III and their relationships with external correlates. We used a clinical sample (N = 150; 33% women) of 65 psychiatric outpatients and 85 incarcerated addicts, who self-reported the SASPD and the LPFS-BF. We conducted correlation and regression analyses in order to determine the relative associations of these two measures with relevant external criteria. SASPD predominantly captured externalizing and other-related problems (e.g., potential harm to others), whereas LPFS-BF predominantly captured internalizing and self-related problems (e.g., identity and distress). Generally, LPFS-BF explained more variance of the external criteria relative to SASPD. The findings seem to reflect that the ICD-11 oriented SASPD emphasizes interpersonal and aggressive features, whereas the DSM-5– oriented LPFS-BF emphasizes self-pathology and distress. More conclusive findings warrant interview-rated personality functioning.
AB - This study evaluated the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD) proposed for ICD-11 and the Level of Personality Functioning Scale–Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF) developed for DSM-5 Section III and their relationships with external correlates. We used a clinical sample (N = 150; 33% women) of 65 psychiatric outpatients and 85 incarcerated addicts, who self-reported the SASPD and the LPFS-BF. We conducted correlation and regression analyses in order to determine the relative associations of these two measures with relevant external criteria. SASPD predominantly captured externalizing and other-related problems (e.g., potential harm to others), whereas LPFS-BF predominantly captured internalizing and self-related problems (e.g., identity and distress). Generally, LPFS-BF explained more variance of the external criteria relative to SASPD. The findings seem to reflect that the ICD-11 oriented SASPD emphasizes interpersonal and aggressive features, whereas the DSM-5– oriented LPFS-BF emphasizes self-pathology and distress. More conclusive findings warrant interview-rated personality functioning.
KW - DSM-5 level of personality functioning
KW - ICD-11 personality disorder severity
KW - LPFS
KW - Maladaptive schemas
KW - SASPD
KW - Schema modes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084327492&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1521/pedi_2018_32_393
DO - 10.1521/pedi_2018_32_393
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 30179575
AN - SCOPUS:85084327492
VL - 34
SP - 231
EP - 249
JO - Journal of Personality Disorders
JF - Journal of Personality Disorders
SN - 0885-579X
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 365592271