Patient-reported health-related quality of life from a randomized phase II trial comparing standard-dose with high-dose twice daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited stage small-cell lung cancer

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Patient-reported health-related quality of life from a randomized phase II trial comparing standard-dose with high-dose twice daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited stage small-cell lung cancer. / Killingberg, Kristin Toftaker; Halvorsen, Tarje Onsøien; Fløtten, Øystein; Brustugun, Odd Terje; Langer, Seppo W; Nyman, Jan; Hornslien, Kjersti; Madebo, Tesfaye; Schytte, Tine; Risum, Signe; Tsakonas, Georgios; Engleson, Jens; Grønberg, Bjørn Henning.

I: Lung Cancer, Bind 166, 2022, s. 49-57.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Killingberg, KT, Halvorsen, TO, Fløtten, Ø, Brustugun, OT, Langer, SW, Nyman, J, Hornslien, K, Madebo, T, Schytte, T, Risum, S, Tsakonas, G, Engleson, J & Grønberg, BH 2022, 'Patient-reported health-related quality of life from a randomized phase II trial comparing standard-dose with high-dose twice daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited stage small-cell lung cancer', Lung Cancer, bind 166, s. 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.02.002

APA

Killingberg, K. T., Halvorsen, T. O., Fløtten, Ø., Brustugun, O. T., Langer, S. W., Nyman, J., Hornslien, K., Madebo, T., Schytte, T., Risum, S., Tsakonas, G., Engleson, J., & Grønberg, B. H. (2022). Patient-reported health-related quality of life from a randomized phase II trial comparing standard-dose with high-dose twice daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited stage small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer, 166, 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.02.002

Vancouver

Killingberg KT, Halvorsen TO, Fløtten Ø, Brustugun OT, Langer SW, Nyman J o.a. Patient-reported health-related quality of life from a randomized phase II trial comparing standard-dose with high-dose twice daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited stage small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2022;166:49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.02.002

Author

Killingberg, Kristin Toftaker ; Halvorsen, Tarje Onsøien ; Fløtten, Øystein ; Brustugun, Odd Terje ; Langer, Seppo W ; Nyman, Jan ; Hornslien, Kjersti ; Madebo, Tesfaye ; Schytte, Tine ; Risum, Signe ; Tsakonas, Georgios ; Engleson, Jens ; Grønberg, Bjørn Henning. / Patient-reported health-related quality of life from a randomized phase II trial comparing standard-dose with high-dose twice daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited stage small-cell lung cancer. I: Lung Cancer. 2022 ; Bind 166. s. 49-57.

Bibtex

@article{160b19eacd6c40539c3f663af027725e,
title = "Patient-reported health-related quality of life from a randomized phase II trial comparing standard-dose with high-dose twice daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited stage small-cell lung cancer",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: In a randomized phase II trial, twice daily (BID) thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) of 60 Gy/40 fractions improved survival compared with 45 Gy/30 fractions in limited stage small-cell lung cancer (LS SCLC). Notably, the higher dose did not cause more toxicity. Here we present health related quality of life (HRQoL) reported by the trial participants during the first 2 years.MATERIALS AND METHODS: 170 patients were randomized 1:1 to TRT of 45 Gy or 60 Gy concurrently with cisplatin/etoposide chemotherapy. The 150 patients who commenced TRT and completed a minimum of one HRQoL-questionnaire were included in the present study. Patients reported HRQoL on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core 30 and Lung Cancer 13 Quality of Life Questionnaires. Questionnaires were completed weeks 0, 4 (before TRT), 8 (end of TRT), 12 (response evaluation after chemoradiotherapy) and 16 (end of prophylactic cranial irradiation), then every 10 weeks year one, and every 3 months year two. Primary HRQoL endpoints were dysphagia and dyspnea. A difference in mean score of ≥10 was defined as clinically significant.RESULTS: Maximum dysphagia was reported on week 8, with no significant difference between treatment arms (mean scores 45 Gy: 44.2, 60 Gy: 51.1). The 60 Gy arm had more dysphagia in the convalescence period, but dysphagia scores returned to baseline levels at week 16 in both arms. For dyspnea there were no significant changes, or differences between treatment arms, at any timepoint. There were no significant differences between treatment arms for any other HRQoL-scales.CONCLUSION: TRT of 60 Gy did not cause significantly higher maximum dysphagia, though patients on the 60 Gy arm reported more dysphagia the first 8 weeks of convalescence. The higher dose was well tolerated and is an attractive alternative to current TRT schedules in LS SCLC. Trial reg Clinicaltrials.gov NCT0204184.",
author = "Killingberg, {Kristin Toftaker} and Halvorsen, {Tarje Ons{\o}ien} and {\O}ystein Fl{\o}tten and Brustugun, {Odd Terje} and Langer, {Seppo W} and Jan Nyman and Kjersti Hornslien and Tesfaye Madebo and Tine Schytte and Signe Risum and Georgios Tsakonas and Jens Engleson and Gr{\o}nberg, {Bj{\o}rn Henning}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.02.002",
language = "English",
volume = "166",
pages = "49--57",
journal = "Lung Cancer",
issn = "0169-5002",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient-reported health-related quality of life from a randomized phase II trial comparing standard-dose with high-dose twice daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited stage small-cell lung cancer

AU - Killingberg, Kristin Toftaker

AU - Halvorsen, Tarje Onsøien

AU - Fløtten, Øystein

AU - Brustugun, Odd Terje

AU - Langer, Seppo W

AU - Nyman, Jan

AU - Hornslien, Kjersti

AU - Madebo, Tesfaye

AU - Schytte, Tine

AU - Risum, Signe

AU - Tsakonas, Georgios

AU - Engleson, Jens

AU - Grønberg, Bjørn Henning

N1 - Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - OBJECTIVES: In a randomized phase II trial, twice daily (BID) thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) of 60 Gy/40 fractions improved survival compared with 45 Gy/30 fractions in limited stage small-cell lung cancer (LS SCLC). Notably, the higher dose did not cause more toxicity. Here we present health related quality of life (HRQoL) reported by the trial participants during the first 2 years.MATERIALS AND METHODS: 170 patients were randomized 1:1 to TRT of 45 Gy or 60 Gy concurrently with cisplatin/etoposide chemotherapy. The 150 patients who commenced TRT and completed a minimum of one HRQoL-questionnaire were included in the present study. Patients reported HRQoL on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core 30 and Lung Cancer 13 Quality of Life Questionnaires. Questionnaires were completed weeks 0, 4 (before TRT), 8 (end of TRT), 12 (response evaluation after chemoradiotherapy) and 16 (end of prophylactic cranial irradiation), then every 10 weeks year one, and every 3 months year two. Primary HRQoL endpoints were dysphagia and dyspnea. A difference in mean score of ≥10 was defined as clinically significant.RESULTS: Maximum dysphagia was reported on week 8, with no significant difference between treatment arms (mean scores 45 Gy: 44.2, 60 Gy: 51.1). The 60 Gy arm had more dysphagia in the convalescence period, but dysphagia scores returned to baseline levels at week 16 in both arms. For dyspnea there were no significant changes, or differences between treatment arms, at any timepoint. There were no significant differences between treatment arms for any other HRQoL-scales.CONCLUSION: TRT of 60 Gy did not cause significantly higher maximum dysphagia, though patients on the 60 Gy arm reported more dysphagia the first 8 weeks of convalescence. The higher dose was well tolerated and is an attractive alternative to current TRT schedules in LS SCLC. Trial reg Clinicaltrials.gov NCT0204184.

AB - OBJECTIVES: In a randomized phase II trial, twice daily (BID) thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) of 60 Gy/40 fractions improved survival compared with 45 Gy/30 fractions in limited stage small-cell lung cancer (LS SCLC). Notably, the higher dose did not cause more toxicity. Here we present health related quality of life (HRQoL) reported by the trial participants during the first 2 years.MATERIALS AND METHODS: 170 patients were randomized 1:1 to TRT of 45 Gy or 60 Gy concurrently with cisplatin/etoposide chemotherapy. The 150 patients who commenced TRT and completed a minimum of one HRQoL-questionnaire were included in the present study. Patients reported HRQoL on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core 30 and Lung Cancer 13 Quality of Life Questionnaires. Questionnaires were completed weeks 0, 4 (before TRT), 8 (end of TRT), 12 (response evaluation after chemoradiotherapy) and 16 (end of prophylactic cranial irradiation), then every 10 weeks year one, and every 3 months year two. Primary HRQoL endpoints were dysphagia and dyspnea. A difference in mean score of ≥10 was defined as clinically significant.RESULTS: Maximum dysphagia was reported on week 8, with no significant difference between treatment arms (mean scores 45 Gy: 44.2, 60 Gy: 51.1). The 60 Gy arm had more dysphagia in the convalescence period, but dysphagia scores returned to baseline levels at week 16 in both arms. For dyspnea there were no significant changes, or differences between treatment arms, at any timepoint. There were no significant differences between treatment arms for any other HRQoL-scales.CONCLUSION: TRT of 60 Gy did not cause significantly higher maximum dysphagia, though patients on the 60 Gy arm reported more dysphagia the first 8 weeks of convalescence. The higher dose was well tolerated and is an attractive alternative to current TRT schedules in LS SCLC. Trial reg Clinicaltrials.gov NCT0204184.

U2 - 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.02.002

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35183991

VL - 166

SP - 49

EP - 57

JO - Lung Cancer

JF - Lung Cancer

SN - 0169-5002

ER -

ID: 297731793