Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures. / Wilson, Ian; Bohm, Eric; Lübbeke, Anne; Lyman, Stephen; Overgaard, Søren; Rolfson, Ola; W-Dahl, Annette; Wilkinson, Mark; Dunbar, Michael.

I: EFORT Open Reviews, Bind 4, Nr. 6, 01.06.2019, s. 357-367.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Wilson, I, Bohm, E, Lübbeke, A, Lyman, S, Overgaard, S, Rolfson, O, W-Dahl, A, Wilkinson, M & Dunbar, M 2019, 'Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures', EFORT Open Reviews, bind 4, nr. 6, s. 357-367. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180080

APA

Wilson, I., Bohm, E., Lübbeke, A., Lyman, S., Overgaard, S., Rolfson, O., W-Dahl, A., Wilkinson, M., & Dunbar, M. (2019). Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures. EFORT Open Reviews, 4(6), 357-367. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180080

Vancouver

Wilson I, Bohm E, Lübbeke A, Lyman S, Overgaard S, Rolfson O o.a. Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures. EFORT Open Reviews. 2019 jun. 1;4(6):357-367. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180080

Author

Wilson, Ian ; Bohm, Eric ; Lübbeke, Anne ; Lyman, Stephen ; Overgaard, Søren ; Rolfson, Ola ; W-Dahl, Annette ; Wilkinson, Mark ; Dunbar, Michael. / Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures. I: EFORT Open Reviews. 2019 ; Bind 4, Nr. 6. s. 357-367.

Bibtex

@article{fa5b5db6e62d4ea8949eb9a94d4a0fc9,
title = "Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures",
abstract = "□Total joint arthroplasty is performed to decreased pain, restore function and productivity and improve quality of life. □One-year implant survivorship following surgery is nearly 100%; however, self-reported satisfaction is 80% after total knee arthroplasty and 90% after total hip arthroplasty. □ Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are produced by patients reporting on their own health status directly without interpretation from a surgeon or other medical professional; a PRO measure (PROM) is a tool, often a questionnaire, that measures different aspects of patientrelated outcomes. □ Generic PROs are related to a patient's general health and quality of life, whereas a specific PRO is focused on a particular disease, symptom or anatomical region. □ While revision surgery is the traditional endpoint of registries, it is blunt and likely insufficient as a measure of success; PROMs address this shortcoming by expanding beyond survival and measuring outcomes that are relevant to patients - relief of pain, restoration of function and improvement in quality of life. □ PROMs are increasing in use in many national and regional orthopaedic arthroplasty registries. □PROMs data can provide important information on valuebased care, support quality assurance and improvement initiatives, help refine surgical indications and may improve shared decision-making and surgical timing. □There are several practical considerations that need to be considered when implementing PROMs collection, as the undertaking itself may be expensive, a burden to the patient, as well as being time and labour intensive.",
author = "Ian Wilson and Eric Bohm and Anne L{\"u}bbeke and Stephen Lyman and S{\o}ren Overgaard and Ola Rolfson and Annette W-Dahl and Mark Wilkinson and Michael Dunbar",
year = "2019",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1302/2058-5241.4.180080",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "357--367",
journal = "EFORT Open Reviews",
issn = "2396-7544",
publisher = "British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures

AU - Wilson, Ian

AU - Bohm, Eric

AU - Lübbeke, Anne

AU - Lyman, Stephen

AU - Overgaard, Søren

AU - Rolfson, Ola

AU - W-Dahl, Annette

AU - Wilkinson, Mark

AU - Dunbar, Michael

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - □Total joint arthroplasty is performed to decreased pain, restore function and productivity and improve quality of life. □One-year implant survivorship following surgery is nearly 100%; however, self-reported satisfaction is 80% after total knee arthroplasty and 90% after total hip arthroplasty. □ Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are produced by patients reporting on their own health status directly without interpretation from a surgeon or other medical professional; a PRO measure (PROM) is a tool, often a questionnaire, that measures different aspects of patientrelated outcomes. □ Generic PROs are related to a patient's general health and quality of life, whereas a specific PRO is focused on a particular disease, symptom or anatomical region. □ While revision surgery is the traditional endpoint of registries, it is blunt and likely insufficient as a measure of success; PROMs address this shortcoming by expanding beyond survival and measuring outcomes that are relevant to patients - relief of pain, restoration of function and improvement in quality of life. □ PROMs are increasing in use in many national and regional orthopaedic arthroplasty registries. □PROMs data can provide important information on valuebased care, support quality assurance and improvement initiatives, help refine surgical indications and may improve shared decision-making and surgical timing. □There are several practical considerations that need to be considered when implementing PROMs collection, as the undertaking itself may be expensive, a burden to the patient, as well as being time and labour intensive.

AB - □Total joint arthroplasty is performed to decreased pain, restore function and productivity and improve quality of life. □One-year implant survivorship following surgery is nearly 100%; however, self-reported satisfaction is 80% after total knee arthroplasty and 90% after total hip arthroplasty. □ Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are produced by patients reporting on their own health status directly without interpretation from a surgeon or other medical professional; a PRO measure (PROM) is a tool, often a questionnaire, that measures different aspects of patientrelated outcomes. □ Generic PROs are related to a patient's general health and quality of life, whereas a specific PRO is focused on a particular disease, symptom or anatomical region. □ While revision surgery is the traditional endpoint of registries, it is blunt and likely insufficient as a measure of success; PROMs address this shortcoming by expanding beyond survival and measuring outcomes that are relevant to patients - relief of pain, restoration of function and improvement in quality of life. □ PROMs are increasing in use in many national and regional orthopaedic arthroplasty registries. □PROMs data can provide important information on valuebased care, support quality assurance and improvement initiatives, help refine surgical indications and may improve shared decision-making and surgical timing. □There are several practical considerations that need to be considered when implementing PROMs collection, as the undertaking itself may be expensive, a burden to the patient, as well as being time and labour intensive.

U2 - 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180080

DO - 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180080

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31210973

AN - SCOPUS:85066934172

VL - 4

SP - 357

EP - 367

JO - EFORT Open Reviews

JF - EFORT Open Reviews

SN - 2396-7544

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 252053004