Optimized Biobanking Procedures for Preservation of RNA in Tissue: Comparison of Snap-Freezing and RNAlater-Fixation Methods

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Optimized Biobanking Procedures for Preservation of RNA in Tissue : Comparison of Snap-Freezing and RNAlater-Fixation Methods. / Hentze, Julie L.; Kringelbach, Tina M.; Novotny, Guy W.; Hamid, Bushra H.; Ravn, Vibeke; Christensen, Ib J.; Høgdall, Claus; Høgdall, Estrid.

I: Biopreservation and Biobanking, Bind 17, Nr. 6, 2019, s. 562-569.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hentze, JL, Kringelbach, TM, Novotny, GW, Hamid, BH, Ravn, V, Christensen, IJ, Høgdall, C & Høgdall, E 2019, 'Optimized Biobanking Procedures for Preservation of RNA in Tissue: Comparison of Snap-Freezing and RNAlater-Fixation Methods', Biopreservation and Biobanking, bind 17, nr. 6, s. 562-569. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2019.0028

APA

Hentze, J. L., Kringelbach, T. M., Novotny, G. W., Hamid, B. H., Ravn, V., Christensen, I. J., Høgdall, C., & Høgdall, E. (2019). Optimized Biobanking Procedures for Preservation of RNA in Tissue: Comparison of Snap-Freezing and RNAlater-Fixation Methods. Biopreservation and Biobanking, 17(6), 562-569. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2019.0028

Vancouver

Hentze JL, Kringelbach TM, Novotny GW, Hamid BH, Ravn V, Christensen IJ o.a. Optimized Biobanking Procedures for Preservation of RNA in Tissue: Comparison of Snap-Freezing and RNAlater-Fixation Methods. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 2019;17(6):562-569. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2019.0028

Author

Hentze, Julie L. ; Kringelbach, Tina M. ; Novotny, Guy W. ; Hamid, Bushra H. ; Ravn, Vibeke ; Christensen, Ib J. ; Høgdall, Claus ; Høgdall, Estrid. / Optimized Biobanking Procedures for Preservation of RNA in Tissue : Comparison of Snap-Freezing and RNAlater-Fixation Methods. I: Biopreservation and Biobanking. 2019 ; Bind 17, Nr. 6. s. 562-569.

Bibtex

@article{54ebbd0ac6ab49a6a30598b657ed7125,
title = "Optimized Biobanking Procedures for Preservation of RNA in Tissue: Comparison of Snap-Freezing and RNAlater-Fixation Methods",
abstract = "Introduction: Personalized treatment, supported by biomarkers, would improve survival of ovarian cancer patients. RNA molecules are potentially important biomarkers. The Danish CancerBiobank provides an infrastructure for handling and storage of biological material, including RNA, from Danish cancer patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of handling-time and fresh-freezing versus RNAlater{\textregistered} fixation on RNA degradation in solid tissue from pelvic mass samples. Materials and Methods: We evaluated RNA quality in surgical tissue from patients with a pelvic mass. Corresponding samples were either fresh-frozen or fixed in RNAlater, at eight different time points after the surgery. Integrity was measured using a bioanalyzer, and the amount and quality were further investigated by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction measuring the expression of housekeeping genes B2M and HPRT1. Results: Our results show that tissue RNA is stable up to at least 180 minutes after the surgery, as the quality was comparable to the quality of RNA handled immediately. Likewise, patient RNA was of acceptable quality after both fresh-frezing and RNAlater fixation, but RNAlater fixation was slightly more effective for RNA preservation. Discussion and Conclusion: Our data suggest that RNA in pelvic mass samples is relatively stable. Knowledge about RNA stability is an important prerequisite for research in RNA biomarkers, where the challenge is to balance the need for careful RNA handling and storage with the need for effective large-scale biobanking in a busy clinical setting where patient treatment is the main priority.",
keywords = "biobanking, biomarkers, gynecological cancer, RNA stability, tissue preservation",
author = "Hentze, {Julie L.} and Kringelbach, {Tina M.} and Novotny, {Guy W.} and Hamid, {Bushra H.} and Vibeke Ravn and Christensen, {Ib J.} and Claus H{\o}gdall and Estrid H{\o}gdall",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1089/bio.2019.0028",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "562--569",
journal = "Biopreservation and Biobanking",
issn = "1947-5535",
publisher = "Mary AnnLiebert, Inc. Publishers",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimized Biobanking Procedures for Preservation of RNA in Tissue

T2 - Comparison of Snap-Freezing and RNAlater-Fixation Methods

AU - Hentze, Julie L.

AU - Kringelbach, Tina M.

AU - Novotny, Guy W.

AU - Hamid, Bushra H.

AU - Ravn, Vibeke

AU - Christensen, Ib J.

AU - Høgdall, Claus

AU - Høgdall, Estrid

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Introduction: Personalized treatment, supported by biomarkers, would improve survival of ovarian cancer patients. RNA molecules are potentially important biomarkers. The Danish CancerBiobank provides an infrastructure for handling and storage of biological material, including RNA, from Danish cancer patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of handling-time and fresh-freezing versus RNAlater® fixation on RNA degradation in solid tissue from pelvic mass samples. Materials and Methods: We evaluated RNA quality in surgical tissue from patients with a pelvic mass. Corresponding samples were either fresh-frozen or fixed in RNAlater, at eight different time points after the surgery. Integrity was measured using a bioanalyzer, and the amount and quality were further investigated by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction measuring the expression of housekeeping genes B2M and HPRT1. Results: Our results show that tissue RNA is stable up to at least 180 minutes after the surgery, as the quality was comparable to the quality of RNA handled immediately. Likewise, patient RNA was of acceptable quality after both fresh-frezing and RNAlater fixation, but RNAlater fixation was slightly more effective for RNA preservation. Discussion and Conclusion: Our data suggest that RNA in pelvic mass samples is relatively stable. Knowledge about RNA stability is an important prerequisite for research in RNA biomarkers, where the challenge is to balance the need for careful RNA handling and storage with the need for effective large-scale biobanking in a busy clinical setting where patient treatment is the main priority.

AB - Introduction: Personalized treatment, supported by biomarkers, would improve survival of ovarian cancer patients. RNA molecules are potentially important biomarkers. The Danish CancerBiobank provides an infrastructure for handling and storage of biological material, including RNA, from Danish cancer patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of handling-time and fresh-freezing versus RNAlater® fixation on RNA degradation in solid tissue from pelvic mass samples. Materials and Methods: We evaluated RNA quality in surgical tissue from patients with a pelvic mass. Corresponding samples were either fresh-frozen or fixed in RNAlater, at eight different time points after the surgery. Integrity was measured using a bioanalyzer, and the amount and quality were further investigated by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction measuring the expression of housekeeping genes B2M and HPRT1. Results: Our results show that tissue RNA is stable up to at least 180 minutes after the surgery, as the quality was comparable to the quality of RNA handled immediately. Likewise, patient RNA was of acceptable quality after both fresh-frezing and RNAlater fixation, but RNAlater fixation was slightly more effective for RNA preservation. Discussion and Conclusion: Our data suggest that RNA in pelvic mass samples is relatively stable. Knowledge about RNA stability is an important prerequisite for research in RNA biomarkers, where the challenge is to balance the need for careful RNA handling and storage with the need for effective large-scale biobanking in a busy clinical setting where patient treatment is the main priority.

KW - biobanking

KW - biomarkers

KW - gynecological cancer

KW - RNA stability

KW - tissue preservation

U2 - 10.1089/bio.2019.0028

DO - 10.1089/bio.2019.0028

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31618057

AN - SCOPUS:85076446803

VL - 17

SP - 562

EP - 569

JO - Biopreservation and Biobanking

JF - Biopreservation and Biobanking

SN - 1947-5535

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 241210066