Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine: The multicentre, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled PREMIUM trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine : The multicentre, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled PREMIUM trial. / Diener, Hans Christoph; Goadsby, Peter J.; Ashina, Messoud; Al-Karagholi, Mohammad Al Mahdi; Sinclair, Alexandra; Mitsikostas, Dimos; Magis, Delphine; Pozo-Rosich, Patricia; Irimia Sieira, Pablo; Làinez, Miguel J.A.; Gaul, Charly; Silver, Nicholas; Hoffmann, Jan; Marin, Juana; Liebler, Eric; Ferrari, Michel D.

I: Cephalalgia, Bind 39, Nr. 12, 10.2019, s. 1475-1487.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Diener, HC, Goadsby, PJ, Ashina, M, Al-Karagholi, MAM, Sinclair, A, Mitsikostas, D, Magis, D, Pozo-Rosich, P, Irimia Sieira, P, Làinez, MJA, Gaul, C, Silver, N, Hoffmann, J, Marin, J, Liebler, E & Ferrari, MD 2019, 'Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine: The multicentre, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled PREMIUM trial', Cephalalgia, bind 39, nr. 12, s. 1475-1487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102419876920

APA

Diener, H. C., Goadsby, P. J., Ashina, M., Al-Karagholi, M. A. M., Sinclair, A., Mitsikostas, D., Magis, D., Pozo-Rosich, P., Irimia Sieira, P., Làinez, M. J. A., Gaul, C., Silver, N., Hoffmann, J., Marin, J., Liebler, E., & Ferrari, M. D. (2019). Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine: The multicentre, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled PREMIUM trial. Cephalalgia, 39(12), 1475-1487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102419876920

Vancouver

Diener HC, Goadsby PJ, Ashina M, Al-Karagholi MAM, Sinclair A, Mitsikostas D o.a. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine: The multicentre, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled PREMIUM trial. Cephalalgia. 2019 okt.;39(12):1475-1487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102419876920

Author

Diener, Hans Christoph ; Goadsby, Peter J. ; Ashina, Messoud ; Al-Karagholi, Mohammad Al Mahdi ; Sinclair, Alexandra ; Mitsikostas, Dimos ; Magis, Delphine ; Pozo-Rosich, Patricia ; Irimia Sieira, Pablo ; Làinez, Miguel J.A. ; Gaul, Charly ; Silver, Nicholas ; Hoffmann, Jan ; Marin, Juana ; Liebler, Eric ; Ferrari, Michel D. / Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine : The multicentre, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled PREMIUM trial. I: Cephalalgia. 2019 ; Bind 39, Nr. 12. s. 1475-1487.

Bibtex

@article{bf8020e55dcf429aabf6c873c330050c,
title = "Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine: The multicentre, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled PREMIUM trial",
abstract = "Introduction: Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS; gammaCore{\textregistered}) has the potential to prevent migraine days in patients with migraine on the basis of mechanistic rationale and pilot clinical data. Methods: This multicentre study included a 4-week run-in period, a 12-week double-blind period of randomised treatment with nVNS or sham, and a 24-week open-label period of nVNS. Patients were to administer two 120-second stimulations bilaterally to the neck three times daily (6–8 hours apart). Results: Of 477 enrolled patients, 332 comprised the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Mean reductions in migraine days per month (primary outcome) were 2.26 for nVNS (n = 165; baseline, 7.9 days) and 1.80 for sham (n = 167; baseline, 8.1 days) (p = 0.15). Results were similar across other outcomes. Upon observation of suboptimal adherence rates, post hoc analysis of patients with ≥ 67% adherence per month demonstrated significant differences between nVNS (n = 138) and sham (n = 140) for outcomes including reduction in migraine days (2.27 vs. 1.53; p = 0.043); therapeutic gains were greater in patients with aura than in those without aura. Most nVNS device-related adverse events were mild and transient, with application site discomfort being the most common. Conclusions: Preventive nVNS treatment in episodic migraine was not superior to sham stimulation in the ITT population. The “sham” device inadvertently provided a level of active vagus nerve stimulation. Post hoc analysis showed significant effects of nVNS in treatment-adherent patients. Study identification and registration: PREMIUM; NCT02378844; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02378844.",
keywords = "migraine prophylaxis, Neuromodulation, non-pharmacologic treatment, preventive therapy, RCT, vagal activation",
author = "Diener, {Hans Christoph} and Goadsby, {Peter J.} and Messoud Ashina and Al-Karagholi, {Mohammad Al Mahdi} and Alexandra Sinclair and Dimos Mitsikostas and Delphine Magis and Patricia Pozo-Rosich and {Irimia Sieira}, Pablo and L{\`a}inez, {Miguel J.A.} and Charly Gaul and Nicholas Silver and Jan Hoffmann and Juana Marin and Eric Liebler and Ferrari, {Michel D.}",
year = "2019",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1177/0333102419876920",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "1475--1487",
journal = "Cephalalgia",
issn = "0800-1952",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine

T2 - The multicentre, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled PREMIUM trial

AU - Diener, Hans Christoph

AU - Goadsby, Peter J.

AU - Ashina, Messoud

AU - Al-Karagholi, Mohammad Al Mahdi

AU - Sinclair, Alexandra

AU - Mitsikostas, Dimos

AU - Magis, Delphine

AU - Pozo-Rosich, Patricia

AU - Irimia Sieira, Pablo

AU - Làinez, Miguel J.A.

AU - Gaul, Charly

AU - Silver, Nicholas

AU - Hoffmann, Jan

AU - Marin, Juana

AU - Liebler, Eric

AU - Ferrari, Michel D.

PY - 2019/10

Y1 - 2019/10

N2 - Introduction: Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS; gammaCore®) has the potential to prevent migraine days in patients with migraine on the basis of mechanistic rationale and pilot clinical data. Methods: This multicentre study included a 4-week run-in period, a 12-week double-blind period of randomised treatment with nVNS or sham, and a 24-week open-label period of nVNS. Patients were to administer two 120-second stimulations bilaterally to the neck three times daily (6–8 hours apart). Results: Of 477 enrolled patients, 332 comprised the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Mean reductions in migraine days per month (primary outcome) were 2.26 for nVNS (n = 165; baseline, 7.9 days) and 1.80 for sham (n = 167; baseline, 8.1 days) (p = 0.15). Results were similar across other outcomes. Upon observation of suboptimal adherence rates, post hoc analysis of patients with ≥ 67% adherence per month demonstrated significant differences between nVNS (n = 138) and sham (n = 140) for outcomes including reduction in migraine days (2.27 vs. 1.53; p = 0.043); therapeutic gains were greater in patients with aura than in those without aura. Most nVNS device-related adverse events were mild and transient, with application site discomfort being the most common. Conclusions: Preventive nVNS treatment in episodic migraine was not superior to sham stimulation in the ITT population. The “sham” device inadvertently provided a level of active vagus nerve stimulation. Post hoc analysis showed significant effects of nVNS in treatment-adherent patients. Study identification and registration: PREMIUM; NCT02378844; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02378844.

AB - Introduction: Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS; gammaCore®) has the potential to prevent migraine days in patients with migraine on the basis of mechanistic rationale and pilot clinical data. Methods: This multicentre study included a 4-week run-in period, a 12-week double-blind period of randomised treatment with nVNS or sham, and a 24-week open-label period of nVNS. Patients were to administer two 120-second stimulations bilaterally to the neck three times daily (6–8 hours apart). Results: Of 477 enrolled patients, 332 comprised the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Mean reductions in migraine days per month (primary outcome) were 2.26 for nVNS (n = 165; baseline, 7.9 days) and 1.80 for sham (n = 167; baseline, 8.1 days) (p = 0.15). Results were similar across other outcomes. Upon observation of suboptimal adherence rates, post hoc analysis of patients with ≥ 67% adherence per month demonstrated significant differences between nVNS (n = 138) and sham (n = 140) for outcomes including reduction in migraine days (2.27 vs. 1.53; p = 0.043); therapeutic gains were greater in patients with aura than in those without aura. Most nVNS device-related adverse events were mild and transient, with application site discomfort being the most common. Conclusions: Preventive nVNS treatment in episodic migraine was not superior to sham stimulation in the ITT population. The “sham” device inadvertently provided a level of active vagus nerve stimulation. Post hoc analysis showed significant effects of nVNS in treatment-adherent patients. Study identification and registration: PREMIUM; NCT02378844; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02378844.

KW - migraine prophylaxis

KW - Neuromodulation

KW - non-pharmacologic treatment

KW - preventive therapy

KW - RCT

KW - vagal activation

U2 - 10.1177/0333102419876920

DO - 10.1177/0333102419876920

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31522546

AN - SCOPUS:85073125762

VL - 39

SP - 1475

EP - 1487

JO - Cephalalgia

JF - Cephalalgia

SN - 0800-1952

IS - 12

ER -

ID: 241092918