No evidence for contraindications to the use of propofol in adults allergic to egg, soy or peanut

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

No evidence for contraindications to the use of propofol in adults allergic to egg, soy or peanut. / Asserhøj, L L; Mosbech, H; Krøigaard, M; Garvey, L H.

I: British Journal of Anaesthesia, Bind 116, Nr. 1, 2016, s. 77-82.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Asserhøj, LL, Mosbech, H, Krøigaard, M & Garvey, LH 2016, 'No evidence for contraindications to the use of propofol in adults allergic to egg, soy or peanut', British Journal of Anaesthesia, bind 116, nr. 1, s. 77-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev360

APA

Asserhøj, L. L., Mosbech, H., Krøigaard, M., & Garvey, L. H. (2016). No evidence for contraindications to the use of propofol in adults allergic to egg, soy or peanut. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 116(1), 77-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev360

Vancouver

Asserhøj LL, Mosbech H, Krøigaard M, Garvey LH. No evidence for contraindications to the use of propofol in adults allergic to egg, soy or peanut. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2016;116(1):77-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev360

Author

Asserhøj, L L ; Mosbech, H ; Krøigaard, M ; Garvey, L H. / No evidence for contraindications to the use of propofol in adults allergic to egg, soy or peanut. I: British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2016 ; Bind 116, Nr. 1. s. 77-82.

Bibtex

@article{bec14322d453463e883710f88688443f,

title = "No evidence for contraindications to the use of propofol in adults allergic to egg, soy or peanut",

abstract = "BACKGROUND: Propofol is thought to be a potential cause of allergic reactions in patients allergic to egg, soy or peanut, since current formulations contain an emulsion that includes egg lecithin and soybean oil. However, other than six case reports lacking in confirmatory evidence of an allergic reaction, there is no evidence linking the two types of allergies. The aim of this study was to examine the frequency of propofol allergy and to investigate if patients with specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) to egg, soy or peanut tolerated propofol.METHODS: Study A examined the frequency of propofol allergy in 273 patients systematically investigated for suspected perioperative allergic reactions. Of these, 153 had been exposed to propofol and underwent skin tests and intravenous provocation. Study B retrospectively investigated propofol exposure and tolerance in 520 adult patients with a positive specific IgE to egg, soy or peanut.RESULTS: Four of the 153 propofol-exposed patients (2.6%) investigated in study A were diagnosed with propofol allergy. Of these, three tested positive only on intravenous provocation. None of the four had allergic symptoms when eating egg, soy or peanut and none had detectable levels of specific IgE to egg or soy in their serum. In study B we found no signs of allergic reactions towards propofol in 171 retrieved anaesthetic charts from 99 patients with specific IgE to egg, soy or peanut.CONCLUSION: No connection between allergy to propofol and allergy to egg, soy or peanut was found. The present practice of choosing alternatives to propofol in patients with this kind of food allergy is not evidence based and should be reconsidered.",

keywords = "Adult, Anesthesia, Intravenous, Drug Hypersensitivity, Egg Hypersensitivity, Female, Food Hypersensitivity, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Peanut Hypersensitivity, Propofol, Retrospective Studies, Skin Tests, Soybeans, Young Adult, Journal Article",

author = "Asserh{\o}j, {L L} and H Mosbech and M Kr{\o}igaard and Garvey, {L H}",

note = "{\textcopyright} The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.1093/bja/aev360",

language = "English",

volume = "116",

pages = "77--82",

journal = "British Journal of Anaesthesia",

issn = "0007-0912",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - No evidence for contraindications to the use of propofol in adults allergic to egg, soy or peanut

AU - Asserhøj, L L

AU - Mosbech, H

AU - Krøigaard, M

AU - Garvey, L H

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - BACKGROUND: Propofol is thought to be a potential cause of allergic reactions in patients allergic to egg, soy or peanut, since current formulations contain an emulsion that includes egg lecithin and soybean oil. However, other than six case reports lacking in confirmatory evidence of an allergic reaction, there is no evidence linking the two types of allergies. The aim of this study was to examine the frequency of propofol allergy and to investigate if patients with specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) to egg, soy or peanut tolerated propofol.METHODS: Study A examined the frequency of propofol allergy in 273 patients systematically investigated for suspected perioperative allergic reactions. Of these, 153 had been exposed to propofol and underwent skin tests and intravenous provocation. Study B retrospectively investigated propofol exposure and tolerance in 520 adult patients with a positive specific IgE to egg, soy or peanut.RESULTS: Four of the 153 propofol-exposed patients (2.6%) investigated in study A were diagnosed with propofol allergy. Of these, three tested positive only on intravenous provocation. None of the four had allergic symptoms when eating egg, soy or peanut and none had detectable levels of specific IgE to egg or soy in their serum. In study B we found no signs of allergic reactions towards propofol in 171 retrieved anaesthetic charts from 99 patients with specific IgE to egg, soy or peanut.CONCLUSION: No connection between allergy to propofol and allergy to egg, soy or peanut was found. The present practice of choosing alternatives to propofol in patients with this kind of food allergy is not evidence based and should be reconsidered.

AB - BACKGROUND: Propofol is thought to be a potential cause of allergic reactions in patients allergic to egg, soy or peanut, since current formulations contain an emulsion that includes egg lecithin and soybean oil. However, other than six case reports lacking in confirmatory evidence of an allergic reaction, there is no evidence linking the two types of allergies. The aim of this study was to examine the frequency of propofol allergy and to investigate if patients with specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) to egg, soy or peanut tolerated propofol.METHODS: Study A examined the frequency of propofol allergy in 273 patients systematically investigated for suspected perioperative allergic reactions. Of these, 153 had been exposed to propofol and underwent skin tests and intravenous provocation. Study B retrospectively investigated propofol exposure and tolerance in 520 adult patients with a positive specific IgE to egg, soy or peanut.RESULTS: Four of the 153 propofol-exposed patients (2.6%) investigated in study A were diagnosed with propofol allergy. Of these, three tested positive only on intravenous provocation. None of the four had allergic symptoms when eating egg, soy or peanut and none had detectable levels of specific IgE to egg or soy in their serum. In study B we found no signs of allergic reactions towards propofol in 171 retrieved anaesthetic charts from 99 patients with specific IgE to egg, soy or peanut.CONCLUSION: No connection between allergy to propofol and allergy to egg, soy or peanut was found. The present practice of choosing alternatives to propofol in patients with this kind of food allergy is not evidence based and should be reconsidered.

KW - Adult

KW - Anesthesia, Intravenous

KW - Drug Hypersensitivity

KW - Egg Hypersensitivity

KW - Female

KW - Food Hypersensitivity

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Netherlands

KW - Peanut Hypersensitivity

KW - Propofol

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Skin Tests

KW - Soybeans

KW - Young Adult

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1093/bja/aev360

DO - 10.1093/bja/aev360

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26675952

VL - 116

SP - 77

EP - 82

JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia

JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia

SN - 0007-0912

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 180966956