Microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol. / Højvig, Jens H.; Pedersen, Nicolas J.; Charabi, Birgitte W.; Wessel, Irene; Jensen, Lisa T.; Nyberg, Jan; Mayman-Holler, Nana; Kehlet, Henrik; Bonde, Christian T.

I: JPRAS Open, Bind 26, 2020, s. 91-100.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Højvig, JH, Pedersen, NJ, Charabi, BW, Wessel, I, Jensen, LT, Nyberg, J, Mayman-Holler, N, Kehlet, H & Bonde, CT 2020, 'Microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol', JPRAS Open, bind 26, s. 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2020.09.008

APA

Højvig, J. H., Pedersen, N. J., Charabi, B. W., Wessel, I., Jensen, L. T., Nyberg, J., Mayman-Holler, N., Kehlet, H., & Bonde, C. T. (2020). Microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol. JPRAS Open, 26, 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2020.09.008

Vancouver

Højvig JH, Pedersen NJ, Charabi BW, Wessel I, Jensen LT, Nyberg J o.a. Microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol. JPRAS Open. 2020;26:91-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2020.09.008

Author

Højvig, Jens H. ; Pedersen, Nicolas J. ; Charabi, Birgitte W. ; Wessel, Irene ; Jensen, Lisa T. ; Nyberg, Jan ; Mayman-Holler, Nana ; Kehlet, Henrik ; Bonde, Christian T. / Microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol. I: JPRAS Open. 2020 ; Bind 26. s. 91-100.

Bibtex

@article{245bf83963a74b4e809d2997aca97072,
title = "Microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol",
abstract = "Introduction: Microvascular reconstructions after head and neck cancer are among the most complicated procedures in plastic surgery. Postoperative complications are common, which often leads to prolonged hospital stay. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a peri- and postoperative care concept with the aim of achieving pain- and risk-free surgery. It has been previously established as superior to conventional care for a wide variety of procedures, including microsurgical procedures such as reconstructions of the breast. Several ERAS protocols for microvascular head and neck cancer reconstructions have been proposed, although most of these are based on extrapolated evidence from different surgical specialties. Results from the implementation of ERAS for these procedures are inconsistent. Methods: The current study investigates our clinical experience of head and neck cancer reconstruction for the period of 2014-2016 with the aim of establishing a list of functional discharge criteria. By combining these with the current published knowledge on the subject, we developed an ERAS protocol. Results: We performed 89 microvascular procedures in the study period, of which 58 were in the oral cavity/sinuses and 31 were laryngopharyngeal. Most cases were squamous cell carcinoma (89%). The average LOS was 20.3 days in both groups. Postoperative complications included infection (37%), 30-days re-operations (19%), and re-admissions (17%). Furthermore, we identified the following discharge criteria: adequate pain relief, ambulation, sufficient nutritional intake, normal infection-related blood parameter results and absence of fever, bowel function, and closure of tracheostomy. Conclusion: Based on our retrospective analysis and identified discharge criteria, we present an approach to develop an ERAS protocol for microvascular reconstruction after head and neck cancer.",
keywords = "enhanced recovery after surgery, ERAS, free flap surgery, Head and neck, head and neck cancer, microvascular reconstruction",
author = "H{\o}jvig, {Jens H.} and Pedersen, {Nicolas J.} and Charabi, {Birgitte W.} and Irene Wessel and Jensen, {Lisa T.} and Jan Nyberg and Nana Mayman-Holler and Henrik Kehlet and Bonde, {Christian T.}",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpra.2020.09.008",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "91--100",
journal = "J P R A S Open",
issn = "2352-5878",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol

AU - Højvig, Jens H.

AU - Pedersen, Nicolas J.

AU - Charabi, Birgitte W.

AU - Wessel, Irene

AU - Jensen, Lisa T.

AU - Nyberg, Jan

AU - Mayman-Holler, Nana

AU - Kehlet, Henrik

AU - Bonde, Christian T.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Introduction: Microvascular reconstructions after head and neck cancer are among the most complicated procedures in plastic surgery. Postoperative complications are common, which often leads to prolonged hospital stay. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a peri- and postoperative care concept with the aim of achieving pain- and risk-free surgery. It has been previously established as superior to conventional care for a wide variety of procedures, including microsurgical procedures such as reconstructions of the breast. Several ERAS protocols for microvascular head and neck cancer reconstructions have been proposed, although most of these are based on extrapolated evidence from different surgical specialties. Results from the implementation of ERAS for these procedures are inconsistent. Methods: The current study investigates our clinical experience of head and neck cancer reconstruction for the period of 2014-2016 with the aim of establishing a list of functional discharge criteria. By combining these with the current published knowledge on the subject, we developed an ERAS protocol. Results: We performed 89 microvascular procedures in the study period, of which 58 were in the oral cavity/sinuses and 31 were laryngopharyngeal. Most cases were squamous cell carcinoma (89%). The average LOS was 20.3 days in both groups. Postoperative complications included infection (37%), 30-days re-operations (19%), and re-admissions (17%). Furthermore, we identified the following discharge criteria: adequate pain relief, ambulation, sufficient nutritional intake, normal infection-related blood parameter results and absence of fever, bowel function, and closure of tracheostomy. Conclusion: Based on our retrospective analysis and identified discharge criteria, we present an approach to develop an ERAS protocol for microvascular reconstruction after head and neck cancer.

AB - Introduction: Microvascular reconstructions after head and neck cancer are among the most complicated procedures in plastic surgery. Postoperative complications are common, which often leads to prolonged hospital stay. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a peri- and postoperative care concept with the aim of achieving pain- and risk-free surgery. It has been previously established as superior to conventional care for a wide variety of procedures, including microsurgical procedures such as reconstructions of the breast. Several ERAS protocols for microvascular head and neck cancer reconstructions have been proposed, although most of these are based on extrapolated evidence from different surgical specialties. Results from the implementation of ERAS for these procedures are inconsistent. Methods: The current study investigates our clinical experience of head and neck cancer reconstruction for the period of 2014-2016 with the aim of establishing a list of functional discharge criteria. By combining these with the current published knowledge on the subject, we developed an ERAS protocol. Results: We performed 89 microvascular procedures in the study period, of which 58 were in the oral cavity/sinuses and 31 were laryngopharyngeal. Most cases were squamous cell carcinoma (89%). The average LOS was 20.3 days in both groups. Postoperative complications included infection (37%), 30-days re-operations (19%), and re-admissions (17%). Furthermore, we identified the following discharge criteria: adequate pain relief, ambulation, sufficient nutritional intake, normal infection-related blood parameter results and absence of fever, bowel function, and closure of tracheostomy. Conclusion: Based on our retrospective analysis and identified discharge criteria, we present an approach to develop an ERAS protocol for microvascular reconstruction after head and neck cancer.

KW - enhanced recovery after surgery

KW - ERAS

KW - free flap surgery

KW - Head and neck

KW - head and neck cancer

KW - microvascular reconstruction

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpra.2020.09.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jpra.2020.09.008

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33225037

AN - SCOPUS:85097418680

VL - 26

SP - 91

EP - 100

JO - J P R A S Open

JF - J P R A S Open

SN - 2352-5878

ER -

ID: 260601164