Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows:. Main objective To assess the benefits and harms of mesh compared with non-mesh in emergency groin hernia repair in adult patients with an inguinal or femoral hernia. Secondary objective To assess whether the effects of mesh versus non-mesh in emergency groin hernia repair differ according to the degree of contamination.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
ArtikelnummerCD015160
TidsskriftCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Vol/bind2022
Udgave nummer6
Antal sider12
ISSN1465-1858
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
Cochrane Colorectal group supported the authors in the development of this protocol. We would like to thank the information specialist Janne Vendt from Cochrane Anaesthesia Group for her contribution to the search methods. The following people contributed to the editorial process for this article: Cindy Farquhar, University of Auckland, New Zealand (Sign-off Editor): made the final editorial decision Lara Kahale, Cochrane Central Editorial Service (Managing Editor): selected peer reviewers, provided comments, collated peer reviewer comments, provided editorial guidance to authors, edited the article Leticia Rodrigues, Cochrane Central Editorial Service (Editorial Assistant): conducted editorial policy checks and supported the editorial team Julia Turner (Copy Editor): copy-edited the protocol Cindy Farquhar, University of Auckland, New Zealand (Sign-off Editor): made the final editorial decision Lara Kahale, Cochrane Central Editorial Service (Managing Editor): selected peer reviewers, provided comments, collated peer reviewer comments, provided editorial guidance to authors, edited the article Leticia Rodrigues, Cochrane Central Editorial Service (Editorial Assistant): conducted editorial policy checks and supported the editorial team Julia Turner (Copy Editor): copy-edited the protocol The following people acted as peer reviewers, providing comments and recommending an editorial decision: Ajita Prabhu, MD, FACS, Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic (clinical review) Barbora East, MD, PhD, FEBS AWS, Third Department of Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital (clinical review) Brian Duncan (consumer review) Takashi Sakamoto, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research (clinical review) Rachel Richardson, Cochrane Evidence Production and Methods Directorate (methods review) Robin Featherstone, Cochrane Central Editorial Service (search review). Ajita Prabhu, MD, FACS, Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic (clinical review) Barbora East, MD, PhD, FEBS AWS, Third Department of Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital (clinical review) Brian Duncan (consumer review) Takashi Sakamoto, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research (clinical review) Rachel Richardson, Cochrane Evidence Production and Methods Directorate (methods review) Robin Featherstone, Cochrane Central Editorial Service (search review).

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

ID: 345512386