Medication-overuse headache: The effect of a patient educational programme—A randomized controlled trial
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Medication-overuse headache : The effect of a patient educational programme—A randomized controlled trial. / Mose, Louise S.; Pedersen, Susanne S.; Jensen, Rigmor H.; Gram, Bibi.
I: European Journal of Pain (United Kingdom), Bind 24, Nr. 2, 2020, s. 435-447.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Medication-overuse headache
T2 - The effect of a patient educational programme—A randomized controlled trial
AU - Mose, Louise S.
AU - Pedersen, Susanne S.
AU - Jensen, Rigmor H.
AU - Gram, Bibi
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background: Little is known about the effects of non-pharmacological interventions among medication-overuse headache (MOH) patients, although non-pharmacological approaches combined with pharmacological treatment are recommended. The objective was to evaluate the effect of an educational programme as an add-on to standard treatment. Methods: Medication-overuse headache patients were randomized (1:1) in a single-centre setting to standard treatment with 12 weeks of education (I-group) versus standard treatment (C-group). The primary outcome was measurement of reduction in headache days/last month at 9 months’ follow-up. Secondary outcomes were headache intensity, acute medication intake, bothersomeness, disability, physical activity and patient satisfaction. The between-group differences were analysed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measurements with a between group factor (I-group vs. C-group) and a time factor (baseline, 4 and 9 months). Results: Ninety-eight patients were randomized (I-group: n = 48, C-group: n = 50), with 40 and 39 patients completing the study, respectively. Intention-to-treat analyses showed that both groups experienced statistically significant reductions in headache days/last month (I-group: −4 ± 6 days (95% CI 2.47; 5.95), p <.001) versus C-group: −4 ± 9 days ([95% CI 1.53; 6.79], p =.003), but there were no significant differences between groups (mean ± SE):Δ: 0.7 days ([95% CI, −2.50; 3.93], p =.66). At follow-up, 85% from the I-group and 86% from C-group, no longer fulfilled the criteria for MOH. Conclusion: The compliance rate was high, indicating that patients were motivated for receiving education, but we found no additional benefits of adding an educational programme to standard treatment. Future research focusing on the MOH complexity, group heterogeneity, duration and content of educational programmes is warranted. Significance: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of non-pharmacological intervention such as patient educational programmes are of great importance, as this approach is common in the clinical practice. Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is a heterogenetic patient group, which must be taken into account when conducting RCTs of non-pharmacological interventions. An educational programme based on Motivational Interviewing is well-tolerated among MOH patients, however, no superior effects were found from adding the educational programme to standard treatment versus standard treatment alone.
AB - Background: Little is known about the effects of non-pharmacological interventions among medication-overuse headache (MOH) patients, although non-pharmacological approaches combined with pharmacological treatment are recommended. The objective was to evaluate the effect of an educational programme as an add-on to standard treatment. Methods: Medication-overuse headache patients were randomized (1:1) in a single-centre setting to standard treatment with 12 weeks of education (I-group) versus standard treatment (C-group). The primary outcome was measurement of reduction in headache days/last month at 9 months’ follow-up. Secondary outcomes were headache intensity, acute medication intake, bothersomeness, disability, physical activity and patient satisfaction. The between-group differences were analysed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measurements with a between group factor (I-group vs. C-group) and a time factor (baseline, 4 and 9 months). Results: Ninety-eight patients were randomized (I-group: n = 48, C-group: n = 50), with 40 and 39 patients completing the study, respectively. Intention-to-treat analyses showed that both groups experienced statistically significant reductions in headache days/last month (I-group: −4 ± 6 days (95% CI 2.47; 5.95), p <.001) versus C-group: −4 ± 9 days ([95% CI 1.53; 6.79], p =.003), but there were no significant differences between groups (mean ± SE):Δ: 0.7 days ([95% CI, −2.50; 3.93], p =.66). At follow-up, 85% from the I-group and 86% from C-group, no longer fulfilled the criteria for MOH. Conclusion: The compliance rate was high, indicating that patients were motivated for receiving education, but we found no additional benefits of adding an educational programme to standard treatment. Future research focusing on the MOH complexity, group heterogeneity, duration and content of educational programmes is warranted. Significance: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of non-pharmacological intervention such as patient educational programmes are of great importance, as this approach is common in the clinical practice. Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is a heterogenetic patient group, which must be taken into account when conducting RCTs of non-pharmacological interventions. An educational programme based on Motivational Interviewing is well-tolerated among MOH patients, however, no superior effects were found from adding the educational programme to standard treatment versus standard treatment alone.
U2 - 10.1002/ejp.1500
DO - 10.1002/ejp.1500
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 31661579
AN - SCOPUS:85075477927
VL - 24
SP - 435
EP - 447
JO - European Journal of Pain
JF - European Journal of Pain
SN - 1090-3801
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 253192797