Massed Training is Logistically Superior to Distributed Training in Acquiring Basic Endovascular Skills
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Massed Training is Logistically Superior to Distributed Training in Acquiring Basic Endovascular Skills. / Soenens, Gilles; Lawaetz, Jonathan; Doyen, Bart; Fourneau, Inge; Moreels, Nathalie; Konge, Lars; Eiberg, Jonas; Van Herzeele, Isabelle.
I: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Bind 66, Nr. 5, 2023, s. 730-737.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Massed Training is Logistically Superior to Distributed Training in Acquiring Basic Endovascular Skills
AU - Soenens, Gilles
AU - Lawaetz, Jonathan
AU - Doyen, Bart
AU - Fourneau, Inge
AU - Moreels, Nathalie
AU - Konge, Lars
AU - Eiberg, Jonas
AU - Van Herzeele, Isabelle
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 European Society for Vascular Surgery
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Objective: A “PROficiency based StePwise Endovascular Curricular Training” (PROSPECT) has proven its superiority over traditional training in a randomised controlled trial to acquire basic endovascular skills outside theatre, but real life adherence is low. This study aimed to compare the original distributed training format, where trainees learn at their own pace, with a massed training format offering the same content within a limited time span while exempt from clinical duties. Secondly, long term skills retention was evaluated. Methods: A multicentre, prospective study allocated participants to the distributed D-PROSPECT or to a massed, compact version (C-PROSPECT) based on logistics such as travel time, participant and instructor availability. A multiple choice question (MCQ) test (max. score 20) tested cognitive skills. Technical skills were assessed using a global rating scale (GRS) (max. score 55), examiner's checklist (max. score 85), and validated simulator metrics. Data were collected pre- and post-programme and at three, six, and 12 months after programme completion. Results: Over four years and in two countries, D-PROSPECT was implemented in two centres and C-PROSPECT in three. A total of 22 participants completed D-PROSPECT with a 41% dropout rate, and 21 completed C-PROSPECT with 0% dropout rate. All participants showed significant improvement for all performance parameters after programme completion: MCQ test (median 14.5 vs. 18; p < .001), GRS (median 20 vs. 41; p < .001), examiner's checklist (median 49 vs. 78.5; p < .001), and simulation metrics (p < .001). Scores of C- or D-PROSPECT participants were not significantly different. No significant differences were seen between groups during the retention period. Conclusion: PROSPECT significantly improves the quality of simulated endovascular performances using a massed or distributed training format. A massed training format of PROSPECT may be preferred to decrease dropout during standardised training to obtain basic endovascular skills in existing surgical curricula.
AB - Objective: A “PROficiency based StePwise Endovascular Curricular Training” (PROSPECT) has proven its superiority over traditional training in a randomised controlled trial to acquire basic endovascular skills outside theatre, but real life adherence is low. This study aimed to compare the original distributed training format, where trainees learn at their own pace, with a massed training format offering the same content within a limited time span while exempt from clinical duties. Secondly, long term skills retention was evaluated. Methods: A multicentre, prospective study allocated participants to the distributed D-PROSPECT or to a massed, compact version (C-PROSPECT) based on logistics such as travel time, participant and instructor availability. A multiple choice question (MCQ) test (max. score 20) tested cognitive skills. Technical skills were assessed using a global rating scale (GRS) (max. score 55), examiner's checklist (max. score 85), and validated simulator metrics. Data were collected pre- and post-programme and at three, six, and 12 months after programme completion. Results: Over four years and in two countries, D-PROSPECT was implemented in two centres and C-PROSPECT in three. A total of 22 participants completed D-PROSPECT with a 41% dropout rate, and 21 completed C-PROSPECT with 0% dropout rate. All participants showed significant improvement for all performance parameters after programme completion: MCQ test (median 14.5 vs. 18; p < .001), GRS (median 20 vs. 41; p < .001), examiner's checklist (median 49 vs. 78.5; p < .001), and simulation metrics (p < .001). Scores of C- or D-PROSPECT participants were not significantly different. No significant differences were seen between groups during the retention period. Conclusion: PROSPECT significantly improves the quality of simulated endovascular performances using a massed or distributed training format. A massed training format of PROSPECT may be preferred to decrease dropout during standardised training to obtain basic endovascular skills in existing surgical curricula.
KW - Competency based education
KW - Distributed training
KW - Endovascular procedures
KW - Massed training
KW - Peripheral arterial disease
KW - Simulation training
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.07.019
DO - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.07.019
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37482280
AN - SCOPUS:85169835852
VL - 66
SP - 730
EP - 737
JO - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
JF - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
SN - 1078-5884
IS - 5
ER -
ID: 376413777