Magnetisk resonans-arteriografi i perifer karkirurgi. En ny og ikke-invasiv metode til visualisering af arterier

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Magnetisk resonans-arteriografi i perifer karkirurgi. En ny og ikke-invasiv metode til visualisering af arterier. / Eiberg, Jonas P; Lundorf, Erik; Thomsen, Carsten; Schroeder, Torben V.

I: Ugeskrift for Laeger, Bind 164, Nr. 19, 06.05.2002, s. 2490-4.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Eiberg, JP, Lundorf, E, Thomsen, C & Schroeder, TV 2002, 'Magnetisk resonans-arteriografi i perifer karkirurgi. En ny og ikke-invasiv metode til visualisering af arterier', Ugeskrift for Laeger, bind 164, nr. 19, s. 2490-4.

APA

Eiberg, J. P., Lundorf, E., Thomsen, C., & Schroeder, T. V. (2002). Magnetisk resonans-arteriografi i perifer karkirurgi. En ny og ikke-invasiv metode til visualisering af arterier. Ugeskrift for Laeger, 164(19), 2490-4.

Vancouver

Eiberg JP, Lundorf E, Thomsen C, Schroeder TV. Magnetisk resonans-arteriografi i perifer karkirurgi. En ny og ikke-invasiv metode til visualisering af arterier. Ugeskrift for Laeger. 2002 maj 6;164(19):2490-4.

Author

Eiberg, Jonas P ; Lundorf, Erik ; Thomsen, Carsten ; Schroeder, Torben V. / Magnetisk resonans-arteriografi i perifer karkirurgi. En ny og ikke-invasiv metode til visualisering af arterier. I: Ugeskrift for Laeger. 2002 ; Bind 164, Nr. 19. s. 2490-4.

Bibtex

@article{edd2a5a0e7c0474a90bea58d2d4bbeb3,
title = "Magnetisk resonans-arteriografi i perifer karkirurgi. En ny og ikke-invasiv metode til visualisering af arterier",
abstract = "Based on a MEDLINE search, we present the current status of magnetic resonance arteriography (MRA) and peripheral vascular surgery. Non-enhanced MRA (TOF-MRA) is more time-consuming than is gadolinium-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA), and the gadolinium-enhanced technique seems to perform more accurately and pose fewer problems. The sensitivity and specificity of TOF-MRA are 93% (range 64-100%) and 88% (range 57-100%) respectively, and that of CE-MRA 96% (range 71-100%) and 96% (63-100%), respectively, with conventional arteriography as the gold standard. Some studies report an incidence of run-off vessels suitable for distal bypass that are visible on MRA, but invisible on conventional arteriography. Gadolinium contrast is given intravenously and is not nephrotoxic. CE-MRA is accurate, compared to conventional arteriography, has the potential to increase the limb salvage rate for selected patients, is non-invasive, and well tolerated.",
author = "Eiberg, {Jonas P} and Erik Lundorf and Carsten Thomsen and Schroeder, {Torben V}",
year = "2002",
month = may,
day = "6",
language = "Dansk",
volume = "164",
pages = "2490--4",
journal = "Ugeskrift for Laeger",
issn = "0041-5782",
publisher = "Almindelige Danske Laegeforening",
number = "19",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Magnetisk resonans-arteriografi i perifer karkirurgi. En ny og ikke-invasiv metode til visualisering af arterier

AU - Eiberg, Jonas P

AU - Lundorf, Erik

AU - Thomsen, Carsten

AU - Schroeder, Torben V

PY - 2002/5/6

Y1 - 2002/5/6

N2 - Based on a MEDLINE search, we present the current status of magnetic resonance arteriography (MRA) and peripheral vascular surgery. Non-enhanced MRA (TOF-MRA) is more time-consuming than is gadolinium-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA), and the gadolinium-enhanced technique seems to perform more accurately and pose fewer problems. The sensitivity and specificity of TOF-MRA are 93% (range 64-100%) and 88% (range 57-100%) respectively, and that of CE-MRA 96% (range 71-100%) and 96% (63-100%), respectively, with conventional arteriography as the gold standard. Some studies report an incidence of run-off vessels suitable for distal bypass that are visible on MRA, but invisible on conventional arteriography. Gadolinium contrast is given intravenously and is not nephrotoxic. CE-MRA is accurate, compared to conventional arteriography, has the potential to increase the limb salvage rate for selected patients, is non-invasive, and well tolerated.

AB - Based on a MEDLINE search, we present the current status of magnetic resonance arteriography (MRA) and peripheral vascular surgery. Non-enhanced MRA (TOF-MRA) is more time-consuming than is gadolinium-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA), and the gadolinium-enhanced technique seems to perform more accurately and pose fewer problems. The sensitivity and specificity of TOF-MRA are 93% (range 64-100%) and 88% (range 57-100%) respectively, and that of CE-MRA 96% (range 71-100%) and 96% (63-100%), respectively, with conventional arteriography as the gold standard. Some studies report an incidence of run-off vessels suitable for distal bypass that are visible on MRA, but invisible on conventional arteriography. Gadolinium contrast is given intravenously and is not nephrotoxic. CE-MRA is accurate, compared to conventional arteriography, has the potential to increase the limb salvage rate for selected patients, is non-invasive, and well tolerated.

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 164

SP - 2490

EP - 2494

JO - Ugeskrift for Laeger

JF - Ugeskrift for Laeger

SN - 0041-5782

IS - 19

ER -

ID: 34096701