Left atrial structure and function among different subtypes of atrial fibrillation: an echocardiographic substudy of the AMIO-CAT trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Left atrial structure and function among different subtypes of atrial fibrillation : an echocardiographic substudy of the AMIO-CAT trial. / Olsen, Flemming Javier; Darkner, Stine; Chen, Xu; Pehrson, Steen; Johannessen, Arne; Hansen, Jim; Gislason, Gunnar; Svendsen, Jesper Hastrup; Biering-Sørensen, Tor.

I: European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging, Bind 21, Nr. 12, 2020, s. 1386-1394.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Olsen, FJ, Darkner, S, Chen, X, Pehrson, S, Johannessen, A, Hansen, J, Gislason, G, Svendsen, JH & Biering-Sørensen, T 2020, 'Left atrial structure and function among different subtypes of atrial fibrillation: an echocardiographic substudy of the AMIO-CAT trial', European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging, bind 21, nr. 12, s. 1386-1394. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaa222

APA

Olsen, F. J., Darkner, S., Chen, X., Pehrson, S., Johannessen, A., Hansen, J., Gislason, G., Svendsen, J. H., & Biering-Sørensen, T. (2020). Left atrial structure and function among different subtypes of atrial fibrillation: an echocardiographic substudy of the AMIO-CAT trial. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging, 21(12), 1386-1394. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaa222

Vancouver

Olsen FJ, Darkner S, Chen X, Pehrson S, Johannessen A, Hansen J o.a. Left atrial structure and function among different subtypes of atrial fibrillation: an echocardiographic substudy of the AMIO-CAT trial. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging. 2020;21(12):1386-1394. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaa222

Author

Olsen, Flemming Javier ; Darkner, Stine ; Chen, Xu ; Pehrson, Steen ; Johannessen, Arne ; Hansen, Jim ; Gislason, Gunnar ; Svendsen, Jesper Hastrup ; Biering-Sørensen, Tor. / Left atrial structure and function among different subtypes of atrial fibrillation : an echocardiographic substudy of the AMIO-CAT trial. I: European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging. 2020 ; Bind 21, Nr. 12. s. 1386-1394.

Bibtex

@article{c899895524f64b1c8dfcd97ed47ef273,
title = "Left atrial structure and function among different subtypes of atrial fibrillation: an echocardiographic substudy of the AMIO-CAT trial",
abstract = "AIMS : Little is known about cardiac structure and function among atrial fibrillation (AF) subtypes; paroxysmal AF vs. persistent AF (PxAF), and across AF burden. We sought to assess differences in left atrial (LA) measures by AF subtype and burden. METHODS AND RESULTS : This was a cross-sectional echocardiographic substudy of a randomized trial of AF patients scheduled for catheter ablation. Patients had an echocardiogram performed 0-90 days prior to study inclusion. We performed conventional echocardiographic measures, left ventricular (LV) and LA speckle tracking. Measures were compared between AF subtype and burden (0%, 0-99%, and 99-100%) determined by 72-h Holter monitoring. Of 212 patients, 107 had paroxysmal AF and 105 had PxAF. Those with PxAF had significantly reduced systolic function (LV ejection fraction: 48% vs. 53%; P < 0.001), larger end-systolic and end-diastolic LA volumes (LAVi and LAEDVi), reduced LA emptying fraction (LAEF: 29% vs. 36%, P < 0.001), and reduced LA strain (LAs) (LAs: 20% vs. 26%, P < 0.001). LA measures remained significantly lower in PxAF after multivariable adjustments. All LA measures and measures of systolic function were significantly impaired in patients with 99-100% AF burden, whereas all measures were similar between the other groups (LAVi: 40mL/m2 vs. 33mL/m2 vs. 34mL/m2; LAEDVi: 31mL/m2 vs. 21mL/m2 vs. 22mL/m2, LA emptying fraction: 23% vs. 35% vs. 36%, LAs: 16% vs. 25% vs. 25%, for 99-100%, 0-99%, and 0% AF, respectively, P < 0.001 for all). These differences were consistent after multivariable adjustments. CONCLUSION : LA mechanics differ between AF subtype and burden and these characteristics influence the clinical interpretation of these measures.",
keywords = "atrial fibrillation, echocardiography, left atrium",
author = "Olsen, {Flemming Javier} and Stine Darkner and Xu Chen and Steen Pehrson and Arne Johannessen and Jim Hansen and Gunnar Gislason and Svendsen, {Jesper Hastrup} and Tor Biering-S{\o}rensen",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1093/ehjci/jeaa222",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "1386--1394",
journal = "European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging",
issn = "2047-2404",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Left atrial structure and function among different subtypes of atrial fibrillation

T2 - an echocardiographic substudy of the AMIO-CAT trial

AU - Olsen, Flemming Javier

AU - Darkner, Stine

AU - Chen, Xu

AU - Pehrson, Steen

AU - Johannessen, Arne

AU - Hansen, Jim

AU - Gislason, Gunnar

AU - Svendsen, Jesper Hastrup

AU - Biering-Sørensen, Tor

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - AIMS : Little is known about cardiac structure and function among atrial fibrillation (AF) subtypes; paroxysmal AF vs. persistent AF (PxAF), and across AF burden. We sought to assess differences in left atrial (LA) measures by AF subtype and burden. METHODS AND RESULTS : This was a cross-sectional echocardiographic substudy of a randomized trial of AF patients scheduled for catheter ablation. Patients had an echocardiogram performed 0-90 days prior to study inclusion. We performed conventional echocardiographic measures, left ventricular (LV) and LA speckle tracking. Measures were compared between AF subtype and burden (0%, 0-99%, and 99-100%) determined by 72-h Holter monitoring. Of 212 patients, 107 had paroxysmal AF and 105 had PxAF. Those with PxAF had significantly reduced systolic function (LV ejection fraction: 48% vs. 53%; P < 0.001), larger end-systolic and end-diastolic LA volumes (LAVi and LAEDVi), reduced LA emptying fraction (LAEF: 29% vs. 36%, P < 0.001), and reduced LA strain (LAs) (LAs: 20% vs. 26%, P < 0.001). LA measures remained significantly lower in PxAF after multivariable adjustments. All LA measures and measures of systolic function were significantly impaired in patients with 99-100% AF burden, whereas all measures were similar between the other groups (LAVi: 40mL/m2 vs. 33mL/m2 vs. 34mL/m2; LAEDVi: 31mL/m2 vs. 21mL/m2 vs. 22mL/m2, LA emptying fraction: 23% vs. 35% vs. 36%, LAs: 16% vs. 25% vs. 25%, for 99-100%, 0-99%, and 0% AF, respectively, P < 0.001 for all). These differences were consistent after multivariable adjustments. CONCLUSION : LA mechanics differ between AF subtype and burden and these characteristics influence the clinical interpretation of these measures.

AB - AIMS : Little is known about cardiac structure and function among atrial fibrillation (AF) subtypes; paroxysmal AF vs. persistent AF (PxAF), and across AF burden. We sought to assess differences in left atrial (LA) measures by AF subtype and burden. METHODS AND RESULTS : This was a cross-sectional echocardiographic substudy of a randomized trial of AF patients scheduled for catheter ablation. Patients had an echocardiogram performed 0-90 days prior to study inclusion. We performed conventional echocardiographic measures, left ventricular (LV) and LA speckle tracking. Measures were compared between AF subtype and burden (0%, 0-99%, and 99-100%) determined by 72-h Holter monitoring. Of 212 patients, 107 had paroxysmal AF and 105 had PxAF. Those with PxAF had significantly reduced systolic function (LV ejection fraction: 48% vs. 53%; P < 0.001), larger end-systolic and end-diastolic LA volumes (LAVi and LAEDVi), reduced LA emptying fraction (LAEF: 29% vs. 36%, P < 0.001), and reduced LA strain (LAs) (LAs: 20% vs. 26%, P < 0.001). LA measures remained significantly lower in PxAF after multivariable adjustments. All LA measures and measures of systolic function were significantly impaired in patients with 99-100% AF burden, whereas all measures were similar between the other groups (LAVi: 40mL/m2 vs. 33mL/m2 vs. 34mL/m2; LAEDVi: 31mL/m2 vs. 21mL/m2 vs. 22mL/m2, LA emptying fraction: 23% vs. 35% vs. 36%, LAs: 16% vs. 25% vs. 25%, for 99-100%, 0-99%, and 0% AF, respectively, P < 0.001 for all). These differences were consistent after multivariable adjustments. CONCLUSION : LA mechanics differ between AF subtype and burden and these characteristics influence the clinical interpretation of these measures.

KW - atrial fibrillation

KW - echocardiography

KW - left atrium

U2 - 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa222

DO - 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa222

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32783051

AN - SCOPUS:85097003361

VL - 21

SP - 1386

EP - 1394

JO - European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging

JF - European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging

SN - 2047-2404

IS - 12

ER -

ID: 252720131