Is inertial flywheel resistance training superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in improving muscle strength? A systematic review with meta-analyses

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Is inertial flywheel resistance training superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in improving muscle strength? A systematic review with meta-analyses. / Vicens-Bordas, J; Esteve, E; Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe, A; Bandholm, T; Thorborg, K.

I: Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, Bind 21, Nr. 1, 2018, s. 75-83.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Vicens-Bordas, J, Esteve, E, Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe, A, Bandholm, T & Thorborg, K 2018, 'Is inertial flywheel resistance training superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in improving muscle strength? A systematic review with meta-analyses', Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, bind 21, nr. 1, s. 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.006

APA

Vicens-Bordas, J., Esteve, E., Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe, A., Bandholm, T., & Thorborg, K. (2018). Is inertial flywheel resistance training superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in improving muscle strength? A systematic review with meta-analyses. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 21(1), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.006

Vancouver

Vicens-Bordas J, Esteve E, Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe A, Bandholm T, Thorborg K. Is inertial flywheel resistance training superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in improving muscle strength? A systematic review with meta-analyses. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2018;21(1):75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.006

Author

Vicens-Bordas, J ; Esteve, E ; Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe, A ; Bandholm, T ; Thorborg, K. / Is inertial flywheel resistance training superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in improving muscle strength? A systematic review with meta-analyses. I: Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2018 ; Bind 21, Nr. 1. s. 75-83.

Bibtex

@article{161ea5d1ca574da2a003b6d0bdc61c28,
title = "Is inertial flywheel resistance training superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in improving muscle strength?: A systematic review with meta-analyses",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this systematic review was to determine if inertial flywheel resistance training is superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in improving muscle strength. The secondary aim was to determine whether inertial flywheel resistance training is superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in improving other muscular adaptations.DESIGN: A systematic review with meta-analyses of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials.METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials with no publication date restrictions until November 2016. We performed meta-analyses on randomised and non-randomised controlled trials to determine the standardized mean difference between the effects of inertial flywheel and gravity-dependent resistance training on muscle strength. A total of 76 and 71 participants were included in the primary and secondary analyses, respectively.RESULTS: After systematic review, we included three randomised and four non-randomised controlled trials. In the primary analysis for the primary outcome muscle strength, the pooled results from randomised controlled trials showed no difference (SMD=-0.05; 95%CI -0.51 to 0.40; p=0.82; I2=0%). In the secondary analyses of the primary outcome, the pooled results from non-randomised controlled trials showed no difference (SMD=0.02; 95%CI -0.45 to 0.49; p=0.93; I2=0%; and SMD=0.03; 95%CI -0.43 to 0.50; p=0.88; I2=0%). Meta-analysis on secondary outcomes could not be performed.CONCLUSION: Based on the available data, inertial flywheel resistance training was not superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in enhancing muscle strength. Data for other strength variables and other muscular adaptations was insufficient to draw firm conclusions from.",
keywords = "Humans, Muscle Strength, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Resistance Training/instrumentation",
author = "J Vicens-Bordas and E Esteve and A Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe and T Bandholm and K Thorborg",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2017 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.006",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "75--83",
journal = "Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport",
issn = "1440-2440",
publisher = "Elsevier Australia",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is inertial flywheel resistance training superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in improving muscle strength?

T2 - A systematic review with meta-analyses

AU - Vicens-Bordas, J

AU - Esteve, E

AU - Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe, A

AU - Bandholm, T

AU - Thorborg, K

N1 - Copyright © 2017 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this systematic review was to determine if inertial flywheel resistance training is superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in improving muscle strength. The secondary aim was to determine whether inertial flywheel resistance training is superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in improving other muscular adaptations.DESIGN: A systematic review with meta-analyses of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials.METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials with no publication date restrictions until November 2016. We performed meta-analyses on randomised and non-randomised controlled trials to determine the standardized mean difference between the effects of inertial flywheel and gravity-dependent resistance training on muscle strength. A total of 76 and 71 participants were included in the primary and secondary analyses, respectively.RESULTS: After systematic review, we included three randomised and four non-randomised controlled trials. In the primary analysis for the primary outcome muscle strength, the pooled results from randomised controlled trials showed no difference (SMD=-0.05; 95%CI -0.51 to 0.40; p=0.82; I2=0%). In the secondary analyses of the primary outcome, the pooled results from non-randomised controlled trials showed no difference (SMD=0.02; 95%CI -0.45 to 0.49; p=0.93; I2=0%; and SMD=0.03; 95%CI -0.43 to 0.50; p=0.88; I2=0%). Meta-analysis on secondary outcomes could not be performed.CONCLUSION: Based on the available data, inertial flywheel resistance training was not superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in enhancing muscle strength. Data for other strength variables and other muscular adaptations was insufficient to draw firm conclusions from.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this systematic review was to determine if inertial flywheel resistance training is superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in improving muscle strength. The secondary aim was to determine whether inertial flywheel resistance training is superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in improving other muscular adaptations.DESIGN: A systematic review with meta-analyses of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials.METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials with no publication date restrictions until November 2016. We performed meta-analyses on randomised and non-randomised controlled trials to determine the standardized mean difference between the effects of inertial flywheel and gravity-dependent resistance training on muscle strength. A total of 76 and 71 participants were included in the primary and secondary analyses, respectively.RESULTS: After systematic review, we included three randomised and four non-randomised controlled trials. In the primary analysis for the primary outcome muscle strength, the pooled results from randomised controlled trials showed no difference (SMD=-0.05; 95%CI -0.51 to 0.40; p=0.82; I2=0%). In the secondary analyses of the primary outcome, the pooled results from non-randomised controlled trials showed no difference (SMD=0.02; 95%CI -0.45 to 0.49; p=0.93; I2=0%; and SMD=0.03; 95%CI -0.43 to 0.50; p=0.88; I2=0%). Meta-analysis on secondary outcomes could not be performed.CONCLUSION: Based on the available data, inertial flywheel resistance training was not superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in enhancing muscle strength. Data for other strength variables and other muscular adaptations was insufficient to draw firm conclusions from.

KW - Humans

KW - Muscle Strength

KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

KW - Resistance Training/instrumentation

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.006

M3 - Review

C2 - 29107539

VL - 21

SP - 75

EP - 83

JO - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

JF - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

SN - 1440-2440

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 216464328