Instantaneous wave free ratio vs. fractional flow reserve and 5-year mortality: iFR SWEDEHEART and DEFINE FLAIR

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Instantaneous wave free ratio vs. fractional flow reserve and 5-year mortality : iFR SWEDEHEART and DEFINE FLAIR. / Eftekhari, Ashkan; Holck, Emil Nielsen; Westra, Jelmer; Olsen, Niels Thue; Bruun, Niels Henrik; Jensen, Lisette Okkels; Engstrøm, Thomas; Christiansen, Evald Høj.

I: European Heart Journal, Bind 44, Nr. 41, 2023, s. 4376-4384.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Eftekhari, A, Holck, EN, Westra, J, Olsen, NT, Bruun, NH, Jensen, LO, Engstrøm, T & Christiansen, EH 2023, 'Instantaneous wave free ratio vs. fractional flow reserve and 5-year mortality: iFR SWEDEHEART and DEFINE FLAIR', European Heart Journal, bind 44, nr. 41, s. 4376-4384. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad582

APA

Eftekhari, A., Holck, E. N., Westra, J., Olsen, N. T., Bruun, N. H., Jensen, L. O., Engstrøm, T., & Christiansen, E. H. (2023). Instantaneous wave free ratio vs. fractional flow reserve and 5-year mortality: iFR SWEDEHEART and DEFINE FLAIR. European Heart Journal, 44(41), 4376-4384. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad582

Vancouver

Eftekhari A, Holck EN, Westra J, Olsen NT, Bruun NH, Jensen LO o.a. Instantaneous wave free ratio vs. fractional flow reserve and 5-year mortality: iFR SWEDEHEART and DEFINE FLAIR. European Heart Journal. 2023;44(41):4376-4384. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad582

Author

Eftekhari, Ashkan ; Holck, Emil Nielsen ; Westra, Jelmer ; Olsen, Niels Thue ; Bruun, Niels Henrik ; Jensen, Lisette Okkels ; Engstrøm, Thomas ; Christiansen, Evald Høj. / Instantaneous wave free ratio vs. fractional flow reserve and 5-year mortality : iFR SWEDEHEART and DEFINE FLAIR. I: European Heart Journal. 2023 ; Bind 44, Nr. 41. s. 4376-4384.

Bibtex

@article{dcb4e00d9d9749a69792516018509b6e,
title = "Instantaneous wave free ratio vs. fractional flow reserve and 5-year mortality: iFR SWEDEHEART and DEFINE FLAIR",
abstract = "Background and Guidelines recommend revascularization of intermediate epicardial artery stenosis to be guided by evidence of ischaemia. Aims Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) are equally recommended. Individual 5-year results of two major randomized trials comparing FFR with iFR-guided revascularization suggested increased all-cause mortality following iFR-guided revascularization. The aim of this study was a study-level meta-analysis of the 5-year outcome data in iFR-SWEDEHEART (NCT02166736) and DEFINE-FLAIR (NCT02053038).Methods Composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and its individual components [all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularisation] were analysed. Raw Kaplan–Meier estimates, numbers at risk, and number of events were extracted at 5-year follow-up and analysed using the ipdfc package (Stata version 18, StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA)Results In total, iFR and FFR-guided revascularization was performed in 2254 and 2257 patients, respectively. Revascularization was more often deferred in the iFR group [n = 1128 (50.0%)] vs. the FFR group [n = 1021 (45.2%); P = .001]. In the iFR-guided group, the number of deaths, MACE, unplanned revascularization, and MI was 188 (8.3%), 484 (21.5%), 235 (10.4%), and 123 (5.5%) vs. 143 (6.3%), 420 (18.6%), 241 (10.7%), and 123 (5.4%) in the FFR group. Hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] estimates for MACE were 1.18 [1.04; 1.34], all-cause mortality 1.34 [1.08; 1.67], unplanned revascularization 0.99 [0.83; 1.19], and MI 1.02 [0.80; 1.Conclusions Five-year all-cause mortality and MACE rates were increased with revascularization guided by iFR compared to FFR. Rates of unplanned revascularization and MI were equal in the two groups.",
keywords = "Coronary physiology, Fractional flow reserve, Instantaneous wave-free ratio",
author = "Ashkan Eftekhari and Holck, {Emil Nielsen} and Jelmer Westra and Olsen, {Niels Thue} and Bruun, {Niels Henrik} and Jensen, {Lisette Okkels} and Thomas Engstr{\o}m and Christiansen, {Evald H{\o}j}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1093/eurheartj/ehad582",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "4376--4384",
journal = "European Heart Journal",
issn = "0195-668X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "41",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Instantaneous wave free ratio vs. fractional flow reserve and 5-year mortality

T2 - iFR SWEDEHEART and DEFINE FLAIR

AU - Eftekhari, Ashkan

AU - Holck, Emil Nielsen

AU - Westra, Jelmer

AU - Olsen, Niels Thue

AU - Bruun, Niels Henrik

AU - Jensen, Lisette Okkels

AU - Engstrøm, Thomas

AU - Christiansen, Evald Høj

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Background and Guidelines recommend revascularization of intermediate epicardial artery stenosis to be guided by evidence of ischaemia. Aims Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) are equally recommended. Individual 5-year results of two major randomized trials comparing FFR with iFR-guided revascularization suggested increased all-cause mortality following iFR-guided revascularization. The aim of this study was a study-level meta-analysis of the 5-year outcome data in iFR-SWEDEHEART (NCT02166736) and DEFINE-FLAIR (NCT02053038).Methods Composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and its individual components [all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularisation] were analysed. Raw Kaplan–Meier estimates, numbers at risk, and number of events were extracted at 5-year follow-up and analysed using the ipdfc package (Stata version 18, StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA)Results In total, iFR and FFR-guided revascularization was performed in 2254 and 2257 patients, respectively. Revascularization was more often deferred in the iFR group [n = 1128 (50.0%)] vs. the FFR group [n = 1021 (45.2%); P = .001]. In the iFR-guided group, the number of deaths, MACE, unplanned revascularization, and MI was 188 (8.3%), 484 (21.5%), 235 (10.4%), and 123 (5.5%) vs. 143 (6.3%), 420 (18.6%), 241 (10.7%), and 123 (5.4%) in the FFR group. Hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] estimates for MACE were 1.18 [1.04; 1.34], all-cause mortality 1.34 [1.08; 1.67], unplanned revascularization 0.99 [0.83; 1.19], and MI 1.02 [0.80; 1.Conclusions Five-year all-cause mortality and MACE rates were increased with revascularization guided by iFR compared to FFR. Rates of unplanned revascularization and MI were equal in the two groups.

AB - Background and Guidelines recommend revascularization of intermediate epicardial artery stenosis to be guided by evidence of ischaemia. Aims Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) are equally recommended. Individual 5-year results of two major randomized trials comparing FFR with iFR-guided revascularization suggested increased all-cause mortality following iFR-guided revascularization. The aim of this study was a study-level meta-analysis of the 5-year outcome data in iFR-SWEDEHEART (NCT02166736) and DEFINE-FLAIR (NCT02053038).Methods Composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and its individual components [all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularisation] were analysed. Raw Kaplan–Meier estimates, numbers at risk, and number of events were extracted at 5-year follow-up and analysed using the ipdfc package (Stata version 18, StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA)Results In total, iFR and FFR-guided revascularization was performed in 2254 and 2257 patients, respectively. Revascularization was more often deferred in the iFR group [n = 1128 (50.0%)] vs. the FFR group [n = 1021 (45.2%); P = .001]. In the iFR-guided group, the number of deaths, MACE, unplanned revascularization, and MI was 188 (8.3%), 484 (21.5%), 235 (10.4%), and 123 (5.5%) vs. 143 (6.3%), 420 (18.6%), 241 (10.7%), and 123 (5.4%) in the FFR group. Hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] estimates for MACE were 1.18 [1.04; 1.34], all-cause mortality 1.34 [1.08; 1.67], unplanned revascularization 0.99 [0.83; 1.19], and MI 1.02 [0.80; 1.Conclusions Five-year all-cause mortality and MACE rates were increased with revascularization guided by iFR compared to FFR. Rates of unplanned revascularization and MI were equal in the two groups.

KW - Coronary physiology

KW - Fractional flow reserve

KW - Instantaneous wave-free ratio

U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad582

DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad582

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37634144

AN - SCOPUS:85176495198

VL - 44

SP - 4376

EP - 4384

JO - European Heart Journal

JF - European Heart Journal

SN - 0195-668X

IS - 41

ER -

ID: 396016938