Standard
Importance of field strength, coil type and image resolution for visualization of bone marrow edema in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - A comparison of contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast on 0.23 T, 0.6 T, 1.5 T and 3 T MRI units. / Krabbe, Simon; Pedersen, Susanne Juhl; Bøyesen, Pernille; Møller, Jakob Møllenbach; Therkildsen, Flemming R.; Madsen, Ole Rintek; Østergaard, Mikkel.
I:
Arthritis & Rheumatism, Bind 63, Nr. 10 (Suppl.), 2011, s. S372-S373.
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Konferenceabstrakt i tidsskrift › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
Krabbe, S, Pedersen, SJ, Bøyesen, P, Møller, JM, Therkildsen, FR, Madsen, OR & Østergaard, M 2011, 'Importance of field strength, coil type and image resolution for visualization of bone marrow edema in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - A comparison of contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast on 0.23 T, 0.6 T, 1.5 T and 3 T MRI units.', Arthritis & Rheumatism, bind 63, nr. 10 (Suppl.), s. S372-S373.
APA
Krabbe, S., Pedersen, S. J., Bøyesen, P., Møller, J. M., Therkildsen, F. R., Madsen, O. R., & Østergaard, M. (2011). Importance of field strength, coil type and image resolution for visualization of bone marrow edema in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - A comparison of contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast on 0.23 T, 0.6 T, 1.5 T and 3 T MRI units. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 63(10 (Suppl.)), S372-S373.
Vancouver
Krabbe S, Pedersen SJ, Bøyesen P, Møller JM, Therkildsen FR, Madsen OR o.a. Importance of field strength, coil type and image resolution for visualization of bone marrow edema in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - A comparison of contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast on 0.23 T, 0.6 T, 1.5 T and 3 T MRI units. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2011;63(10 (Suppl.)):S372-S373.
Author
Krabbe, Simon ; Pedersen, Susanne Juhl ; Bøyesen, Pernille ; Møller, Jakob Møllenbach ; Therkildsen, Flemming R. ; Madsen, Ole Rintek ; Østergaard, Mikkel. / Importance of field strength, coil type and image resolution for visualization of bone marrow edema in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - A comparison of contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast on 0.23 T, 0.6 T, 1.5 T and 3 T MRI units. I: Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2011 ; Bind 63, Nr. 10 (Suppl.). s. S372-S373.
Bibtex
@article{db66964e69544db8a30f4792df7a1bcc,
title = "Importance of field strength, coil type and image resolution for visualization of bone marrow edema in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - A comparison of contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast on 0.23 T, 0.6 T, 1.5 T and 3 T MRI units.",
author = "Simon Krabbe and Pedersen, {Susanne Juhl} and Pernille B{\o}yesen and M{\o}ller, {Jakob M{\o}llenbach} and Therkildsen, {Flemming R.} and Madsen, {Ole Rintek} and Mikkel {\O}stergaard",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "S372--S373",
journal = "Arthritis & Rheumatology",
issn = "2326-5205",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "10 (Suppl.)",
}
RIS
TY - ABST
T1 - Importance of field strength, coil type and image resolution for visualization of bone marrow edema in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - A comparison of contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast on 0.23 T, 0.6 T, 1.5 T and 3 T MRI units.
AU - Krabbe, Simon
AU - Pedersen, Susanne Juhl
AU - Bøyesen, Pernille
AU - Møller, Jakob Møllenbach
AU - Therkildsen, Flemming R.
AU - Madsen, Ole Rintek
AU - Østergaard, Mikkel
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
M3 - Conference abstract in journal
VL - 63
SP - S372-S373
JO - Arthritis & Rheumatology
JF - Arthritis & Rheumatology
SN - 2326-5205
IS - 10 (Suppl.)
ER -
