Implications of Anti-Doping Regulations for Athletes’ Wellbeing

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Implications of Anti-Doping Regulations for Athletes’ Wellbeing. / Elbe, A-M; Overbye, Marie.

Routledge Handbook of Drugs and Sport. red. / J Hoberman; I Waddington; V Møller. Routledge, 2015. s. 332-336.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Elbe, A-M & Overbye, M 2015, Implications of Anti-Doping Regulations for Athletes’ Wellbeing. i J Hoberman, I Waddington & V Møller (red), Routledge Handbook of Drugs and Sport. Routledge, s. 332-336.

APA

Elbe, A-M., & Overbye, M. (2015). Implications of Anti-Doping Regulations for Athletes’ Wellbeing. I J. Hoberman, I. Waddington, & V. Møller (red.), Routledge Handbook of Drugs and Sport (s. 332-336). Routledge.

Vancouver

Elbe A-M, Overbye M. Implications of Anti-Doping Regulations for Athletes’ Wellbeing. I Hoberman J, Waddington I, Møller V, red., Routledge Handbook of Drugs and Sport. Routledge. 2015. s. 332-336

Author

Elbe, A-M ; Overbye, Marie. / Implications of Anti-Doping Regulations for Athletes’ Wellbeing. Routledge Handbook of Drugs and Sport. red. / J Hoberman ; I Waddington ; V Møller. Routledge, 2015. s. 332-336

Bibtex

@inbook{7e74dca18a5d4762bef5130e8614e1bf,
title = "Implications of Anti-Doping Regulations for Athletes{\textquoteright} Wellbeing",
abstract = "Game theoretic approaches to doping in sport started in the late 1980s by Gunnar Breivik and D. Shogun. An analysis of the modernist game showed that doping is likely to spread. The game theoretic studies by Breivik predicted that certain preference rankings would lead to doping. The use of game theory thus helps the authors to argue for a clean and doping-free sport through coordination and cooperation among athletes. Game theoretic explorations looked not only at doping but also at other forms of cheating inside and outside sport. Kjetil K. Haugen{\textquoteright}s study uses game theory to analyze simple two-player doping games representing various types of sports activity. The increase in the number and complexity of participants make the doping game more unpredictable compared to an interval start situation with fewer potential winners and more transparency. In an ordinary two-person game with a relatively low probability of being caught and punished, doping is the dominant but suboptimal strategy.",
author = "A-M Elbe and Marie Overbye",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781134464050",
pages = "332--336",
editor = "J Hoberman and Waddington, {I } and V M{\o}ller",
booktitle = "Routledge Handbook of Drugs and Sport",
publisher = "Routledge",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Implications of Anti-Doping Regulations for Athletes’ Wellbeing

AU - Elbe, A-M

AU - Overbye, Marie

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Game theoretic approaches to doping in sport started in the late 1980s by Gunnar Breivik and D. Shogun. An analysis of the modernist game showed that doping is likely to spread. The game theoretic studies by Breivik predicted that certain preference rankings would lead to doping. The use of game theory thus helps the authors to argue for a clean and doping-free sport through coordination and cooperation among athletes. Game theoretic explorations looked not only at doping but also at other forms of cheating inside and outside sport. Kjetil K. Haugen’s study uses game theory to analyze simple two-player doping games representing various types of sports activity. The increase in the number and complexity of participants make the doping game more unpredictable compared to an interval start situation with fewer potential winners and more transparency. In an ordinary two-person game with a relatively low probability of being caught and punished, doping is the dominant but suboptimal strategy.

AB - Game theoretic approaches to doping in sport started in the late 1980s by Gunnar Breivik and D. Shogun. An analysis of the modernist game showed that doping is likely to spread. The game theoretic studies by Breivik predicted that certain preference rankings would lead to doping. The use of game theory thus helps the authors to argue for a clean and doping-free sport through coordination and cooperation among athletes. Game theoretic explorations looked not only at doping but also at other forms of cheating inside and outside sport. Kjetil K. Haugen’s study uses game theory to analyze simple two-player doping games representing various types of sports activity. The increase in the number and complexity of participants make the doping game more unpredictable compared to an interval start situation with fewer potential winners and more transparency. In an ordinary two-person game with a relatively low probability of being caught and punished, doping is the dominant but suboptimal strategy.

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9781134464050

SP - 332

EP - 336

BT - Routledge Handbook of Drugs and Sport

A2 - Hoberman, J

A2 - Waddington, I

A2 - Møller, V

PB - Routledge

ER -

ID: 385686723