Identifying non-affective psychosis in first admission patients: MMPI-2, structured diagnostic interview, and consensus lifetime best estimate

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Identifying non-affective psychosis in first admission patients : MMPI-2, structured diagnostic interview, and consensus lifetime best estimate. / Carter, John W; Nordgaard, Julie; Parnas, Josef.

I: Psychiatry Research, Bind 279, 2019, s. 71-76.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Carter, JW, Nordgaard, J & Parnas, J 2019, 'Identifying non-affective psychosis in first admission patients: MMPI-2, structured diagnostic interview, and consensus lifetime best estimate', Psychiatry Research, bind 279, s. 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.07.010

APA

Carter, J. W., Nordgaard, J., & Parnas, J. (2019). Identifying non-affective psychosis in first admission patients: MMPI-2, structured diagnostic interview, and consensus lifetime best estimate. Psychiatry Research, 279, 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.07.010

Vancouver

Carter JW, Nordgaard J, Parnas J. Identifying non-affective psychosis in first admission patients: MMPI-2, structured diagnostic interview, and consensus lifetime best estimate. Psychiatry Research. 2019;279:71-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.07.010

Author

Carter, John W ; Nordgaard, Julie ; Parnas, Josef. / Identifying non-affective psychosis in first admission patients : MMPI-2, structured diagnostic interview, and consensus lifetime best estimate. I: Psychiatry Research. 2019 ; Bind 279. s. 71-76.

Bibtex

@article{16ddbb2837444588bc380d045c7649fe,
title = "Identifying non-affective psychosis in first admission patients: MMPI-2, structured diagnostic interview, and consensus lifetime best estimate",
abstract = "PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) as a potential means of improving on the SCID's diagnostic efficacy.METHODS: 76 first-admission patients were assigned DSM-IV consensus diagnoses by two experienced psychiatrists using all available information, then dichotomized into non-affective psychosis and other mental illness groups. The patients were also given the SCID and the MMPI-2. The diagnostic performance of the MMPI-2 was compared to that of the SCID to assess both diagnostic accuracy and incremental validity.RESULTS: MMPI-2 scales 8 (Schizophrenia) and BIZ (Bizarre Mentations) correctly identified 58% and 56% respectively of non-affective psychotic patients. The Goldberg Index had an overall correct classification rate of 70%, but only identified 49% of the psychosis group. The SCID had a correct classification rate of 66% but correctly identified only 25% of the non-affective psychosis patients. Three MMPI-2 scales combined with the SCID resulted in an overall correct classification rate of 73%, and identification of 66% of the non-affective psychosis patients.CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the MMPI-2 may identify early psychosis at least as well as the SCID. Furthermore, using a combination of the MMPI-2 and the SCID shows incremental validity over using the SCID alone.",
author = "Carter, {John W} and Julie Nordgaard and Josef Parnas",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1016/j.psychres.2019.07.010",
language = "English",
volume = "279",
pages = "71--76",
journal = "Psychiatry Research",
issn = "0165-1781",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying non-affective psychosis in first admission patients

T2 - MMPI-2, structured diagnostic interview, and consensus lifetime best estimate

AU - Carter, John W

AU - Nordgaard, Julie

AU - Parnas, Josef

N1 - Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) as a potential means of improving on the SCID's diagnostic efficacy.METHODS: 76 first-admission patients were assigned DSM-IV consensus diagnoses by two experienced psychiatrists using all available information, then dichotomized into non-affective psychosis and other mental illness groups. The patients were also given the SCID and the MMPI-2. The diagnostic performance of the MMPI-2 was compared to that of the SCID to assess both diagnostic accuracy and incremental validity.RESULTS: MMPI-2 scales 8 (Schizophrenia) and BIZ (Bizarre Mentations) correctly identified 58% and 56% respectively of non-affective psychotic patients. The Goldberg Index had an overall correct classification rate of 70%, but only identified 49% of the psychosis group. The SCID had a correct classification rate of 66% but correctly identified only 25% of the non-affective psychosis patients. Three MMPI-2 scales combined with the SCID resulted in an overall correct classification rate of 73%, and identification of 66% of the non-affective psychosis patients.CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the MMPI-2 may identify early psychosis at least as well as the SCID. Furthermore, using a combination of the MMPI-2 and the SCID shows incremental validity over using the SCID alone.

AB - PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) as a potential means of improving on the SCID's diagnostic efficacy.METHODS: 76 first-admission patients were assigned DSM-IV consensus diagnoses by two experienced psychiatrists using all available information, then dichotomized into non-affective psychosis and other mental illness groups. The patients were also given the SCID and the MMPI-2. The diagnostic performance of the MMPI-2 was compared to that of the SCID to assess both diagnostic accuracy and incremental validity.RESULTS: MMPI-2 scales 8 (Schizophrenia) and BIZ (Bizarre Mentations) correctly identified 58% and 56% respectively of non-affective psychotic patients. The Goldberg Index had an overall correct classification rate of 70%, but only identified 49% of the psychosis group. The SCID had a correct classification rate of 66% but correctly identified only 25% of the non-affective psychosis patients. Three MMPI-2 scales combined with the SCID resulted in an overall correct classification rate of 73%, and identification of 66% of the non-affective psychosis patients.CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the MMPI-2 may identify early psychosis at least as well as the SCID. Furthermore, using a combination of the MMPI-2 and the SCID shows incremental validity over using the SCID alone.

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.07.010

DO - 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.07.010

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31310892

VL - 279

SP - 71

EP - 76

JO - Psychiatry Research

JF - Psychiatry Research

SN - 0165-1781

ER -

ID: 234952785