“I think we should wait and see”: A qualitative study of call-takers’ decision-making in consultations with patients suffering unrecognized myocardial infarction

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

“I think we should wait and see” : A qualitative study of call-takers’ decision-making in consultations with patients suffering unrecognized myocardial infarction. / Jensen, Britta; Vardinghus – Nielsen, Henrik; Mills, Elisabeth Helen Anna; Møller, Amalie Lykkemark; Gnesin, Filip; Zylyftari, Nertila; Kragholm, Kristian; Folke, Fredrik; Christensen, Helle Collatz; Blomberg, Stig Nikolaj; Torp-Pedersen, Christian; Bøggild, Henrik.

I: Patient Education and Counseling, Bind 128, 108376, 2024.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jensen, B, Vardinghus – Nielsen, H, Mills, EHA, Møller, AL, Gnesin, F, Zylyftari, N, Kragholm, K, Folke, F, Christensen, HC, Blomberg, SN, Torp-Pedersen, C & Bøggild, H 2024, '“I think we should wait and see”: A qualitative study of call-takers’ decision-making in consultations with patients suffering unrecognized myocardial infarction', Patient Education and Counseling, bind 128, 108376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108376

APA

Jensen, B., Vardinghus – Nielsen, H., Mills, E. H. A., Møller, A. L., Gnesin, F., Zylyftari, N., Kragholm, K., Folke, F., Christensen, H. C., Blomberg, S. N., Torp-Pedersen, C., & Bøggild, H. (2024). “I think we should wait and see”: A qualitative study of call-takers’ decision-making in consultations with patients suffering unrecognized myocardial infarction. Patient Education and Counseling, 128, [108376]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108376

Vancouver

Jensen B, Vardinghus – Nielsen H, Mills EHA, Møller AL, Gnesin F, Zylyftari N o.a. “I think we should wait and see”: A qualitative study of call-takers’ decision-making in consultations with patients suffering unrecognized myocardial infarction. Patient Education and Counseling. 2024;128. 108376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108376

Author

Jensen, Britta ; Vardinghus – Nielsen, Henrik ; Mills, Elisabeth Helen Anna ; Møller, Amalie Lykkemark ; Gnesin, Filip ; Zylyftari, Nertila ; Kragholm, Kristian ; Folke, Fredrik ; Christensen, Helle Collatz ; Blomberg, Stig Nikolaj ; Torp-Pedersen, Christian ; Bøggild, Henrik. / “I think we should wait and see” : A qualitative study of call-takers’ decision-making in consultations with patients suffering unrecognized myocardial infarction. I: Patient Education and Counseling. 2024 ; Bind 128.

Bibtex

@article{cc30934c6bd14ec49d61f51c2d52eae6,
title = "“I think we should wait and see”: A qualitative study of call-takers{\textquoteright} decision-making in consultations with patients suffering unrecognized myocardial infarction",
abstract = "Objectives: Call-takers face a complex situation when assessing medical problems in emergency medical services calls. Patients with myocardial infarction experiencing atypical symptoms risk misinterpretation. We examined development in call-takers' decision-making process in telephone consultations with patients having imminent myocardial infarction. Methods: Recording of 38 calls among 19 patients (two per patient) who contacted Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services (Denmark) at least twice within one week before myocardial infarction diagnosis. The penultimate and last call were compared using qualitative content analysis. Results: Call-takers{\textquoteright} assessment of the condition changed from unclear symptom picture and dismissal of heart disease in penultimate call to severe condition, not heart-related, and possible heart disease in last call. Call-takers recommended watchful waiting in the penultimate call. Both calls involved response negotiation, while caution regarding misinterpretation was only seen in the penultimate call. Conclusion: Call-takers used different decision-making approaches when the caller's symptom descriptions appeared unclear and not corresponding with the medical understanding of severe conditions. Call-takers did not negotiate the condition's assessment but engaged in discussions about the response choice. Practice implications: A protocol to negotiate response choice with callers having unclear clinical conditions should be developed. Clarifying watchful waiting as a recommendation may assist call-takers{\textquoteright} decision-making.",
keywords = "Atypical symptoms, Communication, Emergency medical services, Myocardial infarction, Qualitative content analysis, Systems theory",
author = "Britta Jensen and {Vardinghus – Nielsen}, Henrik and Mills, {Elisabeth Helen Anna} and M{\o}ller, {Amalie Lykkemark} and Filip Gnesin and Nertila Zylyftari and Kristian Kragholm and Fredrik Folke and Christensen, {Helle Collatz} and Blomberg, {Stig Nikolaj} and Christian Torp-Pedersen and Henrik B{\o}ggild",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Authors",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2024.108376",
language = "English",
volume = "128",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - “I think we should wait and see”

T2 - A qualitative study of call-takers’ decision-making in consultations with patients suffering unrecognized myocardial infarction

AU - Jensen, Britta

AU - Vardinghus – Nielsen, Henrik

AU - Mills, Elisabeth Helen Anna

AU - Møller, Amalie Lykkemark

AU - Gnesin, Filip

AU - Zylyftari, Nertila

AU - Kragholm, Kristian

AU - Folke, Fredrik

AU - Christensen, Helle Collatz

AU - Blomberg, Stig Nikolaj

AU - Torp-Pedersen, Christian

AU - Bøggild, Henrik

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Objectives: Call-takers face a complex situation when assessing medical problems in emergency medical services calls. Patients with myocardial infarction experiencing atypical symptoms risk misinterpretation. We examined development in call-takers' decision-making process in telephone consultations with patients having imminent myocardial infarction. Methods: Recording of 38 calls among 19 patients (two per patient) who contacted Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services (Denmark) at least twice within one week before myocardial infarction diagnosis. The penultimate and last call were compared using qualitative content analysis. Results: Call-takers’ assessment of the condition changed from unclear symptom picture and dismissal of heart disease in penultimate call to severe condition, not heart-related, and possible heart disease in last call. Call-takers recommended watchful waiting in the penultimate call. Both calls involved response negotiation, while caution regarding misinterpretation was only seen in the penultimate call. Conclusion: Call-takers used different decision-making approaches when the caller's symptom descriptions appeared unclear and not corresponding with the medical understanding of severe conditions. Call-takers did not negotiate the condition's assessment but engaged in discussions about the response choice. Practice implications: A protocol to negotiate response choice with callers having unclear clinical conditions should be developed. Clarifying watchful waiting as a recommendation may assist call-takers’ decision-making.

AB - Objectives: Call-takers face a complex situation when assessing medical problems in emergency medical services calls. Patients with myocardial infarction experiencing atypical symptoms risk misinterpretation. We examined development in call-takers' decision-making process in telephone consultations with patients having imminent myocardial infarction. Methods: Recording of 38 calls among 19 patients (two per patient) who contacted Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services (Denmark) at least twice within one week before myocardial infarction diagnosis. The penultimate and last call were compared using qualitative content analysis. Results: Call-takers’ assessment of the condition changed from unclear symptom picture and dismissal of heart disease in penultimate call to severe condition, not heart-related, and possible heart disease in last call. Call-takers recommended watchful waiting in the penultimate call. Both calls involved response negotiation, while caution regarding misinterpretation was only seen in the penultimate call. Conclusion: Call-takers used different decision-making approaches when the caller's symptom descriptions appeared unclear and not corresponding with the medical understanding of severe conditions. Call-takers did not negotiate the condition's assessment but engaged in discussions about the response choice. Practice implications: A protocol to negotiate response choice with callers having unclear clinical conditions should be developed. Clarifying watchful waiting as a recommendation may assist call-takers’ decision-making.

KW - Atypical symptoms

KW - Communication

KW - Emergency medical services

KW - Myocardial infarction

KW - Qualitative content analysis

KW - Systems theory

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108376

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108376

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 39079431

AN - SCOPUS:85199696363

VL - 128

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

M1 - 108376

ER -

ID: 401608379