Hypoglycemia-Associated EEG Changes in Prepubertal Children With Type 1 Diabetes
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Hypoglycemia-Associated EEG Changes in Prepubertal Children With Type 1 Diabetes. / Hansen, Grith Lærkholm; Foli-Andersen, Pia; Fredheim, Siri; Juhl, Claus B.; Remvig, Line Sofie; Rose, Martin Høyer; Rosenzweig, Ivana; Beniczky, Sándor; Olsen, Birthe; Pilgaard, Kasper; Johannesen, Jesper.
I: Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Bind 10, Nr. 6, 11.2016, s. 1222-1229.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Hypoglycemia-Associated EEG Changes in Prepubertal Children With Type 1 Diabetes
AU - Hansen, Grith Lærkholm
AU - Foli-Andersen, Pia
AU - Fredheim, Siri
AU - Juhl, Claus B.
AU - Remvig, Line Sofie
AU - Rose, Martin Høyer
AU - Rosenzweig, Ivana
AU - Beniczky, Sándor
AU - Olsen, Birthe
AU - Pilgaard, Kasper
AU - Johannesen, Jesper
N1 - © 2016 Diabetes Technology Society.
PY - 2016/11
Y1 - 2016/11
N2 - BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to explore the possible difference in the electroencephalogram (EEG) pattern between euglycemia and hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) during daytime and during sleep. The aim is to develop a hypoglycemia alarm based on continuous EEG measurement and real-time signal processing.METHOD: Eight T1D patients aged 6-12 years were included. A hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemic clamp was performed to induce hypoglycemia both during daytime and during sleep. Continuous EEG monitoring was performed. For each patient, quantitative EEG (qEEG) measures were calculated. A within-patient analysis was conducted comparing hypoglycemia versus euglycemia changes in the qEEG. The nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed. A real-time analyzing algorithm developed for adults was applied.RESULTS: The qEEG showed significant differences in specific bands comparing hypoglycemia to euglycemia both during daytime and during sleep. In daytime the EEG-based algorithm identified hypoglycemia in all children on average at a blood glucose (BG) level of 2.5 ± 0.5 mmol/l and 18.4 (ranging from 0 to 55) minutes prior to blood glucose nadir. During sleep the nighttime algorithm did not perform.CONCLUSIONS: We found significant differences in the qEEG in euglycemia and hypoglycemia both during daytime and during sleep. The algorithm developed for adults detected hypoglycemia in all children during daytime. The algorithm had too many false alarms during the night because it was more sensitive to deep sleep EEG patterns than hypoglycemia-related EEG changes. An algorithm for nighttime EEG is needed for accurate detection of nocturnal hypoglycemic episodes in children. This study indicates that a hypoglycemia alarm may be developed using real-time continuous EEG monitoring.
AB - BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to explore the possible difference in the electroencephalogram (EEG) pattern between euglycemia and hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) during daytime and during sleep. The aim is to develop a hypoglycemia alarm based on continuous EEG measurement and real-time signal processing.METHOD: Eight T1D patients aged 6-12 years were included. A hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemic clamp was performed to induce hypoglycemia both during daytime and during sleep. Continuous EEG monitoring was performed. For each patient, quantitative EEG (qEEG) measures were calculated. A within-patient analysis was conducted comparing hypoglycemia versus euglycemia changes in the qEEG. The nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed. A real-time analyzing algorithm developed for adults was applied.RESULTS: The qEEG showed significant differences in specific bands comparing hypoglycemia to euglycemia both during daytime and during sleep. In daytime the EEG-based algorithm identified hypoglycemia in all children on average at a blood glucose (BG) level of 2.5 ± 0.5 mmol/l and 18.4 (ranging from 0 to 55) minutes prior to blood glucose nadir. During sleep the nighttime algorithm did not perform.CONCLUSIONS: We found significant differences in the qEEG in euglycemia and hypoglycemia both during daytime and during sleep. The algorithm developed for adults detected hypoglycemia in all children during daytime. The algorithm had too many false alarms during the night because it was more sensitive to deep sleep EEG patterns than hypoglycemia-related EEG changes. An algorithm for nighttime EEG is needed for accurate detection of nocturnal hypoglycemic episodes in children. This study indicates that a hypoglycemia alarm may be developed using real-time continuous EEG monitoring.
KW - Journal Article
U2 - 10.1177/1932296816634357
DO - 10.1177/1932296816634357
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 26920641
VL - 10
SP - 1222
EP - 1229
JO - Journal of diabetes science and technology
JF - Journal of diabetes science and technology
SN - 1932-2968
IS - 6
ER -
ID: 176957118