How to Define Durability of Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves: Facts and Misconceptions
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
How to Define Durability of Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves : Facts and Misconceptions. / Capodanno, Davide; Søndergaard, Lars.
I: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, Bind 13, Nr. 2, 2020, s. 257-260.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - How to Define Durability of Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves
T2 - Facts and Misconceptions
AU - Capodanno, Davide
AU - Søndergaard, Lars
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In the evolving scenario of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), the topic of bioprosthetic valve durability is becoming increasingly important. Unfortunately, the definition of long-term durability of surgical and transcatheter bioprostheses has been inconsistent over time. Comparative studies of TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement, or studies comparing TAVR devices, would benefit from the use of standardized definitions of valve durability. The definitions of structural valve deterioration and bioprosthetic valve failure developed by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) have been endorsed by both the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and embraced by many investigators worldwide. In this viewpoint, the authors discuss the strengths and limitations of such approach, which is intended to balance the need for accuracy and simplicity in reporting of long-term durability.
AB - In the evolving scenario of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), the topic of bioprosthetic valve durability is becoming increasingly important. Unfortunately, the definition of long-term durability of surgical and transcatheter bioprostheses has been inconsistent over time. Comparative studies of TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement, or studies comparing TAVR devices, would benefit from the use of standardized definitions of valve durability. The definitions of structural valve deterioration and bioprosthetic valve failure developed by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) have been endorsed by both the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and embraced by many investigators worldwide. In this viewpoint, the authors discuss the strengths and limitations of such approach, which is intended to balance the need for accuracy and simplicity in reporting of long-term durability.
KW - bioprosthesis
KW - definitions
KW - durability
KW - valve
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.025
DO - 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.025
M3 - Review
C2 - 31973798
AN - SCOPUS:85077657548
VL - 13
SP - 257
EP - 260
JO - J A C C: Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - J A C C: Cardiovascular Interventions
SN - 1936-8798
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 260253885