Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. / Kottner, Jan; Audige, Laurent; Brorson, Stig; Donner, Allan; Gajewski, Byron J; Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn; Roberts, Chris; Shoukri, Mohamed; Streiner, David L.
I: International Journal of Nursing Studies, Bind 48, Nr. 6, 2011, s. 661-71.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed
AU - Kottner, Jan
AU - Audige, Laurent
AU - Brorson, Stig
AU - Donner, Allan
AU - Gajewski, Byron J
AU - Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn
AU - Roberts, Chris
AU - Shoukri, Mohamed
AU - Streiner, David L
N1 - Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Results of reliability and agreement studies are intended to provide information about the amount of error inherent in any diagnosis, score, or measurement. The level of reliability and agreement among users of scales, instruments, or classifications is widely unknown. Therefore, there is a need for rigorously conducted interrater and intrarater reliability and agreement studies. Information about sample selection, study design, and statistical analysis is often incomplete. Because of inadequate reporting, interpretation and synthesis of study results are often difficult. Widely accepted criteria, standards, or guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement in the health care and medical field are lacking. The objective was to develop guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies.
AB - Results of reliability and agreement studies are intended to provide information about the amount of error inherent in any diagnosis, score, or measurement. The level of reliability and agreement among users of scales, instruments, or classifications is widely unknown. Therefore, there is a need for rigorously conducted interrater and intrarater reliability and agreement studies. Information about sample selection, study design, and statistical analysis is often incomplete. Because of inadequate reporting, interpretation and synthesis of study results are often difficult. Widely accepted criteria, standards, or guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement in the health care and medical field are lacking. The objective was to develop guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies.
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.01.016
DO - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.01.016
M3 - Journal article
VL - 48
SP - 661
EP - 671
JO - Nursing
JF - Nursing
SN - 0020-7489
IS - 6
ER -
ID: 185940857