Gender Composition Predicts Gender Bias: A Meta-Reanalysis of Hiring Discrimination Audit Experiments

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Gender Composition Predicts Gender Bias : A Meta-Reanalysis of Hiring Discrimination Audit Experiments. / Galos, Diana-Roxana; Coppock , Alexander .

I: Science Advances, Bind 9, Nr. 18, 7979, 2023.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Galos, D-R & Coppock , A 2023, 'Gender Composition Predicts Gender Bias: A Meta-Reanalysis of Hiring Discrimination Audit Experiments', Science Advances, bind 9, nr. 18, 7979. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ade7979

APA

Galos, D-R., & Coppock , A. (2023). Gender Composition Predicts Gender Bias: A Meta-Reanalysis of Hiring Discrimination Audit Experiments. Science Advances, 9(18), [7979]. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ade7979

Vancouver

Galos D-R, Coppock A. Gender Composition Predicts Gender Bias: A Meta-Reanalysis of Hiring Discrimination Audit Experiments. Science Advances. 2023;9(18). 7979. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ade7979

Author

Galos, Diana-Roxana ; Coppock , Alexander . / Gender Composition Predicts Gender Bias : A Meta-Reanalysis of Hiring Discrimination Audit Experiments. I: Science Advances. 2023 ; Bind 9, Nr. 18.

Bibtex

@article{3299616e8c704a6a9e516148a9597021,
title = "Gender Composition Predicts Gender Bias: A Meta-Reanalysis of Hiring Discrimination Audit Experiments",
abstract = "Since 1983, more than 70 employment audit experiments, carried out in more than 26 countries across five continents, have randomized the gender of fictitious applicants to measure the extent of hiring discrimination on the basis of gender. The results are mixed: Some studies find discrimination against men, and others find discrimination against women. We reconcile these heterogeneous findings through a “meta-reanalysis” of the average effects of being described as a woman (versus a man), conditional on occupation. We find a strongly positive gender gradient. In (relatively better paying) occupations dominated by men, the effect of being a woman is negative, while in the (relatively lower paying) occupations dominated by women, the effect is positive. In this way, heterogeneous employment discrimination on the basis of gender preserves status quo gender distributions and earnings gaps. These patterns hold among both minority and majority status applicants.",
author = "Diana-Roxana Galos and Alexander Coppock",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1126/sciadv.ade7979",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Science advances",
issn = "2375-2548",
publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",
number = "18",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender Composition Predicts Gender Bias

T2 - A Meta-Reanalysis of Hiring Discrimination Audit Experiments

AU - Galos, Diana-Roxana

AU - Coppock , Alexander

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Since 1983, more than 70 employment audit experiments, carried out in more than 26 countries across five continents, have randomized the gender of fictitious applicants to measure the extent of hiring discrimination on the basis of gender. The results are mixed: Some studies find discrimination against men, and others find discrimination against women. We reconcile these heterogeneous findings through a “meta-reanalysis” of the average effects of being described as a woman (versus a man), conditional on occupation. We find a strongly positive gender gradient. In (relatively better paying) occupations dominated by men, the effect of being a woman is negative, while in the (relatively lower paying) occupations dominated by women, the effect is positive. In this way, heterogeneous employment discrimination on the basis of gender preserves status quo gender distributions and earnings gaps. These patterns hold among both minority and majority status applicants.

AB - Since 1983, more than 70 employment audit experiments, carried out in more than 26 countries across five continents, have randomized the gender of fictitious applicants to measure the extent of hiring discrimination on the basis of gender. The results are mixed: Some studies find discrimination against men, and others find discrimination against women. We reconcile these heterogeneous findings through a “meta-reanalysis” of the average effects of being described as a woman (versus a man), conditional on occupation. We find a strongly positive gender gradient. In (relatively better paying) occupations dominated by men, the effect of being a woman is negative, while in the (relatively lower paying) occupations dominated by women, the effect is positive. In this way, heterogeneous employment discrimination on the basis of gender preserves status quo gender distributions and earnings gaps. These patterns hold among both minority and majority status applicants.

U2 - 10.1126/sciadv.ade7979

DO - 10.1126/sciadv.ade7979

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37146136

VL - 9

JO - Science advances

JF - Science advances

SN - 2375-2548

IS - 18

M1 - 7979

ER -

ID: 377706636