Follow-up after rectal cancer: developing and testing a novel patient-led follow-up program. Study protocol

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Follow-up after rectal cancer : developing and testing a novel patient-led follow-up program. Study protocol. / Hovdenak Jakobsen, Ida; Juul, Therese; Bernstein, Inge; Christensen, Peter; Jensen, Frank Svendsen; Johansen, Christoffer; Lindhardt Larsen, Susie; Laurberg, Søren; Madsen, Mogens Rørbæk; Thorlacius-Ussing, Ole; Vind Thaysen, Henriette.

I: Acta Oncologica, Bind 56, Nr. 2, 2017, s. 307-313.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hovdenak Jakobsen, I, Juul, T, Bernstein, I, Christensen, P, Jensen, FS, Johansen, C, Lindhardt Larsen, S, Laurberg, S, Madsen, MR, Thorlacius-Ussing, O & Vind Thaysen, H 2017, 'Follow-up after rectal cancer: developing and testing a novel patient-led follow-up program. Study protocol', Acta Oncologica, bind 56, nr. 2, s. 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2016.1267400

APA

Hovdenak Jakobsen, I., Juul, T., Bernstein, I., Christensen, P., Jensen, F. S., Johansen, C., Lindhardt Larsen, S., Laurberg, S., Madsen, M. R., Thorlacius-Ussing, O., & Vind Thaysen, H. (2017). Follow-up after rectal cancer: developing and testing a novel patient-led follow-up program. Study protocol. Acta Oncologica, 56(2), 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2016.1267400

Vancouver

Hovdenak Jakobsen I, Juul T, Bernstein I, Christensen P, Jensen FS, Johansen C o.a. Follow-up after rectal cancer: developing and testing a novel patient-led follow-up program. Study protocol. Acta Oncologica. 2017;56(2):307-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2016.1267400

Author

Hovdenak Jakobsen, Ida ; Juul, Therese ; Bernstein, Inge ; Christensen, Peter ; Jensen, Frank Svendsen ; Johansen, Christoffer ; Lindhardt Larsen, Susie ; Laurberg, Søren ; Madsen, Mogens Rørbæk ; Thorlacius-Ussing, Ole ; Vind Thaysen, Henriette. / Follow-up after rectal cancer : developing and testing a novel patient-led follow-up program. Study protocol. I: Acta Oncologica. 2017 ; Bind 56, Nr. 2. s. 307-313.

Bibtex

@article{9f547feff12a43659a742e7f61be787a,
title = "Follow-up after rectal cancer: developing and testing a novel patient-led follow-up program. Study protocol",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The main treatment for non-metastatic rectal cancer (RC) is surgical resection. Late adverse effects that are highly prevalent and negatively impact patients' symptom burden and quality of life are: bowel-, urological and sexual dysfunctions; psychological distress; fear of recurrence. Patients and clinicians have requested a more patient-centred follow-up, balancing the focus on detection of recurrence, and physiological and psychological late adverse effects. The current follow-up program primarily focuses on detection of recurrence, with less attention on late adverse effects. As a consequence, the randomized controlled trial Follow-up after Rectal Cancer (FURCA) has been launched, testing the effect of a new patient-led, follow-up program. The aim of this paper is to describe the methodology used in the FURCA study and to report results from the development of the patient-led, follow-up program. Adult patients, treated with curative intent for primary adenocarcinoma in the rectum are included from four Danish centers.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients are randomized into an intervention group, receiving standardized education and access to self-referral to an assigned project nurse, or a control group following the current follow-up program with routine medicals. The primary outcomes are symptom burden and quality of life, measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Colorectal (FACT-C) questionnaire. Other outcome and demographic data are collected as patient-reported measures and register-based data. Results from developing the intervention: The education program is based on data from two focus group interviews and the feedback from experts. An algorithm is developed in order to qualify the research nurses' responses to patients' self-referral. Discussion and perspectives: The results of the FURCA study will strengthen the evidence base for RC follow-up, and qualify the ongoing transformation in cancer follow-up programs.",
keywords = "Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Clinical Protocols, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Rectal Neoplasms/complications",
author = "{Hovdenak Jakobsen}, Ida and Therese Juul and Inge Bernstein and Peter Christensen and Jensen, {Frank Svendsen} and Christoffer Johansen and {Lindhardt Larsen}, Susie and S{\o}ren Laurberg and Madsen, {Mogens R{\o}rb{\ae}k} and Ole Thorlacius-Ussing and {Vind Thaysen}, Henriette",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/0284186X.2016.1267400",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "307--313",
journal = "Acta Oncologica",
issn = "1100-1704",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Follow-up after rectal cancer

T2 - developing and testing a novel patient-led follow-up program. Study protocol

AU - Hovdenak Jakobsen, Ida

AU - Juul, Therese

AU - Bernstein, Inge

AU - Christensen, Peter

AU - Jensen, Frank Svendsen

AU - Johansen, Christoffer

AU - Lindhardt Larsen, Susie

AU - Laurberg, Søren

AU - Madsen, Mogens Rørbæk

AU - Thorlacius-Ussing, Ole

AU - Vind Thaysen, Henriette

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - BACKGROUND: The main treatment for non-metastatic rectal cancer (RC) is surgical resection. Late adverse effects that are highly prevalent and negatively impact patients' symptom burden and quality of life are: bowel-, urological and sexual dysfunctions; psychological distress; fear of recurrence. Patients and clinicians have requested a more patient-centred follow-up, balancing the focus on detection of recurrence, and physiological and psychological late adverse effects. The current follow-up program primarily focuses on detection of recurrence, with less attention on late adverse effects. As a consequence, the randomized controlled trial Follow-up after Rectal Cancer (FURCA) has been launched, testing the effect of a new patient-led, follow-up program. The aim of this paper is to describe the methodology used in the FURCA study and to report results from the development of the patient-led, follow-up program. Adult patients, treated with curative intent for primary adenocarcinoma in the rectum are included from four Danish centers.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients are randomized into an intervention group, receiving standardized education and access to self-referral to an assigned project nurse, or a control group following the current follow-up program with routine medicals. The primary outcomes are symptom burden and quality of life, measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Colorectal (FACT-C) questionnaire. Other outcome and demographic data are collected as patient-reported measures and register-based data. Results from developing the intervention: The education program is based on data from two focus group interviews and the feedback from experts. An algorithm is developed in order to qualify the research nurses' responses to patients' self-referral. Discussion and perspectives: The results of the FURCA study will strengthen the evidence base for RC follow-up, and qualify the ongoing transformation in cancer follow-up programs.

AB - BACKGROUND: The main treatment for non-metastatic rectal cancer (RC) is surgical resection. Late adverse effects that are highly prevalent and negatively impact patients' symptom burden and quality of life are: bowel-, urological and sexual dysfunctions; psychological distress; fear of recurrence. Patients and clinicians have requested a more patient-centred follow-up, balancing the focus on detection of recurrence, and physiological and psychological late adverse effects. The current follow-up program primarily focuses on detection of recurrence, with less attention on late adverse effects. As a consequence, the randomized controlled trial Follow-up after Rectal Cancer (FURCA) has been launched, testing the effect of a new patient-led, follow-up program. The aim of this paper is to describe the methodology used in the FURCA study and to report results from the development of the patient-led, follow-up program. Adult patients, treated with curative intent for primary adenocarcinoma in the rectum are included from four Danish centers.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients are randomized into an intervention group, receiving standardized education and access to self-referral to an assigned project nurse, or a control group following the current follow-up program with routine medicals. The primary outcomes are symptom burden and quality of life, measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Colorectal (FACT-C) questionnaire. Other outcome and demographic data are collected as patient-reported measures and register-based data. Results from developing the intervention: The education program is based on data from two focus group interviews and the feedback from experts. An algorithm is developed in order to qualify the research nurses' responses to patients' self-referral. Discussion and perspectives: The results of the FURCA study will strengthen the evidence base for RC follow-up, and qualify the ongoing transformation in cancer follow-up programs.

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Algorithms

KW - Clinical Protocols

KW - Female

KW - Follow-Up Studies

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology

KW - Patient Education as Topic

KW - Patient Reported Outcome Measures

KW - Rectal Neoplasms/complications

U2 - 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1267400

DO - 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1267400

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 28068158

VL - 56

SP - 307

EP - 313

JO - Acta Oncologica

JF - Acta Oncologica

SN - 1100-1704

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 193899124