Five compared with six fractions per week of conventional radiotherapy of squamous-cell carcinoma of head and neck: DAHANCA 6 and 7 randomised controlled trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Five compared with six fractions per week of conventional radiotherapy of squamous-cell carcinoma of head and neck: DAHANCA 6 and 7 randomised controlled trial. / Overgaard, Jens; Hansen, Hanne Sand; Specht, Lena; Overgaard, Marie; Grau, Cai; Andersen, Elo; Bentzen, Jens; Bastholt, Lars; Hansen, Olfred; Johansen, Jørgen; Andersen, Lisbeth; Evensen, Jan F.

I: Lancet, Bind 362, Nr. 9388, 2003, s. 933-40.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Overgaard, J, Hansen, HS, Specht, L, Overgaard, M, Grau, C, Andersen, E, Bentzen, J, Bastholt, L, Hansen, O, Johansen, J, Andersen, L & Evensen, JF 2003, 'Five compared with six fractions per week of conventional radiotherapy of squamous-cell carcinoma of head and neck: DAHANCA 6 and 7 randomised controlled trial', Lancet, bind 362, nr. 9388, s. 933-40.

APA

Overgaard, J., Hansen, H. S., Specht, L., Overgaard, M., Grau, C., Andersen, E., Bentzen, J., Bastholt, L., Hansen, O., Johansen, J., Andersen, L., & Evensen, J. F. (2003). Five compared with six fractions per week of conventional radiotherapy of squamous-cell carcinoma of head and neck: DAHANCA 6 and 7 randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 362(9388), 933-40.

Vancouver

Overgaard J, Hansen HS, Specht L, Overgaard M, Grau C, Andersen E o.a. Five compared with six fractions per week of conventional radiotherapy of squamous-cell carcinoma of head and neck: DAHANCA 6 and 7 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;362(9388):933-40.

Author

Overgaard, Jens ; Hansen, Hanne Sand ; Specht, Lena ; Overgaard, Marie ; Grau, Cai ; Andersen, Elo ; Bentzen, Jens ; Bastholt, Lars ; Hansen, Olfred ; Johansen, Jørgen ; Andersen, Lisbeth ; Evensen, Jan F. / Five compared with six fractions per week of conventional radiotherapy of squamous-cell carcinoma of head and neck: DAHANCA 6 and 7 randomised controlled trial. I: Lancet. 2003 ; Bind 362, Nr. 9388. s. 933-40.

Bibtex

@article{741736004c7f11df928f000ea68e967b,
title = "Five compared with six fractions per week of conventional radiotherapy of squamous-cell carcinoma of head and neck: DAHANCA 6 and 7 randomised controlled trial",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Although head and neck cancer can be cured by radiotherapy, the optimum treatment time for locoregional control is unclear. We aimed to find out whether shortening of treatment time by use of six instead of five radiotherapy fractions per week improves the tumour response in squamous-cell carcinoma. METHODS: We did a multicentre, controlled, randomised trial. Between January, 1992, and December, 1999, of 1485 patients treated with primary radiotherapy alone, 1476 eligible patients were randomly assigned five (n=726) or six (n=750) fractions per week at the same total dose and fraction number (66-68 Gy in 33-34 fractions to all tumour sites except well-differentiated T1 glottic tumours, which were treated with 62 Gy). All patients, except those with glottic cancers, also received the hypoxic radiosensitiser nimorazole. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: More than 97% of the patients received the planned total dose. Median overall treatment times were 39 days (six-fraction group) and 46 days (five-fraction group). Overall 5-year locoregional control rates were 70% and 60% for the six-fraction and five-fraction groups, respectively (p=0.0005). The whole benefit of shortening of treatment time was seen for primary tumour control (76 vs 64% for six and five fractions, p=0.0001), but was non-significant for neck-node control. Six compared with five fractions per week improved preservation of the voice among patients with laryngeal cancer (80 vs 68%, p=0.007). Disease-specific survival improved (73 vs 66% for six and five fractions, p=0.01) but not overall survival. Acute morbidity was significantly more frequent with six than with five fractions, but was transient. INTERPRETATION: The shortening of overall treatment time by increase of the weekly number of fractions is beneficial in patients with head and neck cancer. The six-fractions-weekly regimen has become the standard treatment in Denmark.",
author = "Jens Overgaard and Hansen, {Hanne Sand} and Lena Specht and Marie Overgaard and Cai Grau and Elo Andersen and Jens Bentzen and Lars Bastholt and Olfred Hansen and J{\o}rgen Johansen and Lisbeth Andersen and Evensen, {Jan F}",
note = "Keywords: Adult; Aged; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Denmark; Dose Fractionation; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nimorazole; Proportional Hazards Models; Radiation-Sensitizing Agents; Radiotherapy Dosage; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome",
year = "2003",
language = "English",
volume = "362",
pages = "933--40",
journal = "The Lancet",
issn = "0140-6736",
publisher = "TheLancet Publishing Group",
number = "9388",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Five compared with six fractions per week of conventional radiotherapy of squamous-cell carcinoma of head and neck: DAHANCA 6 and 7 randomised controlled trial

AU - Overgaard, Jens

AU - Hansen, Hanne Sand

AU - Specht, Lena

AU - Overgaard, Marie

AU - Grau, Cai

AU - Andersen, Elo

AU - Bentzen, Jens

AU - Bastholt, Lars

AU - Hansen, Olfred

AU - Johansen, Jørgen

AU - Andersen, Lisbeth

AU - Evensen, Jan F

N1 - Keywords: Adult; Aged; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Denmark; Dose Fractionation; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nimorazole; Proportional Hazards Models; Radiation-Sensitizing Agents; Radiotherapy Dosage; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - BACKGROUND: Although head and neck cancer can be cured by radiotherapy, the optimum treatment time for locoregional control is unclear. We aimed to find out whether shortening of treatment time by use of six instead of five radiotherapy fractions per week improves the tumour response in squamous-cell carcinoma. METHODS: We did a multicentre, controlled, randomised trial. Between January, 1992, and December, 1999, of 1485 patients treated with primary radiotherapy alone, 1476 eligible patients were randomly assigned five (n=726) or six (n=750) fractions per week at the same total dose and fraction number (66-68 Gy in 33-34 fractions to all tumour sites except well-differentiated T1 glottic tumours, which were treated with 62 Gy). All patients, except those with glottic cancers, also received the hypoxic radiosensitiser nimorazole. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: More than 97% of the patients received the planned total dose. Median overall treatment times were 39 days (six-fraction group) and 46 days (five-fraction group). Overall 5-year locoregional control rates were 70% and 60% for the six-fraction and five-fraction groups, respectively (p=0.0005). The whole benefit of shortening of treatment time was seen for primary tumour control (76 vs 64% for six and five fractions, p=0.0001), but was non-significant for neck-node control. Six compared with five fractions per week improved preservation of the voice among patients with laryngeal cancer (80 vs 68%, p=0.007). Disease-specific survival improved (73 vs 66% for six and five fractions, p=0.01) but not overall survival. Acute morbidity was significantly more frequent with six than with five fractions, but was transient. INTERPRETATION: The shortening of overall treatment time by increase of the weekly number of fractions is beneficial in patients with head and neck cancer. The six-fractions-weekly regimen has become the standard treatment in Denmark.

AB - BACKGROUND: Although head and neck cancer can be cured by radiotherapy, the optimum treatment time for locoregional control is unclear. We aimed to find out whether shortening of treatment time by use of six instead of five radiotherapy fractions per week improves the tumour response in squamous-cell carcinoma. METHODS: We did a multicentre, controlled, randomised trial. Between January, 1992, and December, 1999, of 1485 patients treated with primary radiotherapy alone, 1476 eligible patients were randomly assigned five (n=726) or six (n=750) fractions per week at the same total dose and fraction number (66-68 Gy in 33-34 fractions to all tumour sites except well-differentiated T1 glottic tumours, which were treated with 62 Gy). All patients, except those with glottic cancers, also received the hypoxic radiosensitiser nimorazole. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: More than 97% of the patients received the planned total dose. Median overall treatment times were 39 days (six-fraction group) and 46 days (five-fraction group). Overall 5-year locoregional control rates were 70% and 60% for the six-fraction and five-fraction groups, respectively (p=0.0005). The whole benefit of shortening of treatment time was seen for primary tumour control (76 vs 64% for six and five fractions, p=0.0001), but was non-significant for neck-node control. Six compared with five fractions per week improved preservation of the voice among patients with laryngeal cancer (80 vs 68%, p=0.007). Disease-specific survival improved (73 vs 66% for six and five fractions, p=0.01) but not overall survival. Acute morbidity was significantly more frequent with six than with five fractions, but was transient. INTERPRETATION: The shortening of overall treatment time by increase of the weekly number of fractions is beneficial in patients with head and neck cancer. The six-fractions-weekly regimen has become the standard treatment in Denmark.

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 14511925

VL - 362

SP - 933

EP - 940

JO - The Lancet

JF - The Lancet

SN - 0140-6736

IS - 9388

ER -

ID: 19371083