Feasibility and safety of transcaval transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A multicentre European registry

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Feasibility and safety of transcaval transcatheter aortic valve implantation : A multicentre European registry. / Costa, Giulia; De Backer, Ole; Pilgrim, Thomas; Kasel, Markus; Redwood, Simon; Aminian, Adel; Lanz, Jonas; Michel, Jonathan; Patterson, Tiffany; Windecker, Stephan; Prendergast, Bernard; Greenbaum, Adam B.; Søndergaard, Lars.

I: EuroIntervention, Bind 15, Nr. 15, 2020, s. E1319-E1324.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Costa, G, De Backer, O, Pilgrim, T, Kasel, M, Redwood, S, Aminian, A, Lanz, J, Michel, J, Patterson, T, Windecker, S, Prendergast, B, Greenbaum, AB & Søndergaard, L 2020, 'Feasibility and safety of transcaval transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A multicentre European registry', EuroIntervention, bind 15, nr. 15, s. E1319-E1324. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00797

APA

Costa, G., De Backer, O., Pilgrim, T., Kasel, M., Redwood, S., Aminian, A., Lanz, J., Michel, J., Patterson, T., Windecker, S., Prendergast, B., Greenbaum, A. B., & Søndergaard, L. (2020). Feasibility and safety of transcaval transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A multicentre European registry. EuroIntervention, 15(15), E1319-E1324. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00797

Vancouver

Costa G, De Backer O, Pilgrim T, Kasel M, Redwood S, Aminian A o.a. Feasibility and safety of transcaval transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A multicentre European registry. EuroIntervention. 2020;15(15):E1319-E1324. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00797

Author

Costa, Giulia ; De Backer, Ole ; Pilgrim, Thomas ; Kasel, Markus ; Redwood, Simon ; Aminian, Adel ; Lanz, Jonas ; Michel, Jonathan ; Patterson, Tiffany ; Windecker, Stephan ; Prendergast, Bernard ; Greenbaum, Adam B. ; Søndergaard, Lars. / Feasibility and safety of transcaval transcatheter aortic valve implantation : A multicentre European registry. I: EuroIntervention. 2020 ; Bind 15, Nr. 15. s. E1319-E1324.

Bibtex

@article{7dddb135911844018f83d22792db780b,
title = "Feasibility and safety of transcaval transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A multicentre European registry",
abstract = "Aims: A transfemoral transarterial approach is considered the preferable access route for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), followed by a transaxillary/subclavian TAVI approach. However, these approaches may not be an option in all patients. This study aimed to report the initial European experience with transfemoral transcaval TAVI. Methods and results: Data on 50 patients treated by transcaval TAVI in five European centres were collected and analysed according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 definitions. The study population had a mean age of 78.7±8.0 years and a high surgical risk profile (median STS risk score 6.1%, interquartile range 3.0-11.2%). Transcaval access was successful in 49 out of 50 patients and device success was obtained in 94% of cases. Closure of the caval-aortic puncture site with a nitinol cardiac occluder was successful in all cases without need for emergent surgery. One patient received additional sealing of the aortic puncture site with a covered stent one day post TAVI due to a gradual haemoglobin drop of 3 g/dL. VARC-2-defined life-threatening bleeding and major vascular complications possibly related to transcaval access were 4% and 10%, respectively. There were no bleeding or vascular complications after discharge. At 30 days, the clinical efficacy endpoint was reached in 88% of patients. Conclusions: Transfemoral transcaval access proved to be a feasible and safe TAVI approach for highrisk patients with severe aortic stenosis not suitable for transfemoral or transaxillary/subclavian transarterial access.",
keywords = "Aortic stenosis, Other, TAVI",
author = "Giulia Costa and {De Backer}, Ole and Thomas Pilgrim and Markus Kasel and Simon Redwood and Adel Aminian and Jonas Lanz and Jonathan Michel and Tiffany Patterson and Stephan Windecker and Bernard Prendergast and Greenbaum, {Adam B.} and Lars S{\o}ndergaard",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00797",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "E1319--E1324",
journal = "EuroIntervention",
issn = "1774-024X",
publisher = "Europa Digital & Publishing",
number = "15",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility and safety of transcaval transcatheter aortic valve implantation

T2 - A multicentre European registry

AU - Costa, Giulia

AU - De Backer, Ole

AU - Pilgrim, Thomas

AU - Kasel, Markus

AU - Redwood, Simon

AU - Aminian, Adel

AU - Lanz, Jonas

AU - Michel, Jonathan

AU - Patterson, Tiffany

AU - Windecker, Stephan

AU - Prendergast, Bernard

AU - Greenbaum, Adam B.

AU - Søndergaard, Lars

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Aims: A transfemoral transarterial approach is considered the preferable access route for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), followed by a transaxillary/subclavian TAVI approach. However, these approaches may not be an option in all patients. This study aimed to report the initial European experience with transfemoral transcaval TAVI. Methods and results: Data on 50 patients treated by transcaval TAVI in five European centres were collected and analysed according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 definitions. The study population had a mean age of 78.7±8.0 years and a high surgical risk profile (median STS risk score 6.1%, interquartile range 3.0-11.2%). Transcaval access was successful in 49 out of 50 patients and device success was obtained in 94% of cases. Closure of the caval-aortic puncture site with a nitinol cardiac occluder was successful in all cases without need for emergent surgery. One patient received additional sealing of the aortic puncture site with a covered stent one day post TAVI due to a gradual haemoglobin drop of 3 g/dL. VARC-2-defined life-threatening bleeding and major vascular complications possibly related to transcaval access were 4% and 10%, respectively. There were no bleeding or vascular complications after discharge. At 30 days, the clinical efficacy endpoint was reached in 88% of patients. Conclusions: Transfemoral transcaval access proved to be a feasible and safe TAVI approach for highrisk patients with severe aortic stenosis not suitable for transfemoral or transaxillary/subclavian transarterial access.

AB - Aims: A transfemoral transarterial approach is considered the preferable access route for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), followed by a transaxillary/subclavian TAVI approach. However, these approaches may not be an option in all patients. This study aimed to report the initial European experience with transfemoral transcaval TAVI. Methods and results: Data on 50 patients treated by transcaval TAVI in five European centres were collected and analysed according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 definitions. The study population had a mean age of 78.7±8.0 years and a high surgical risk profile (median STS risk score 6.1%, interquartile range 3.0-11.2%). Transcaval access was successful in 49 out of 50 patients and device success was obtained in 94% of cases. Closure of the caval-aortic puncture site with a nitinol cardiac occluder was successful in all cases without need for emergent surgery. One patient received additional sealing of the aortic puncture site with a covered stent one day post TAVI due to a gradual haemoglobin drop of 3 g/dL. VARC-2-defined life-threatening bleeding and major vascular complications possibly related to transcaval access were 4% and 10%, respectively. There were no bleeding or vascular complications after discharge. At 30 days, the clinical efficacy endpoint was reached in 88% of patients. Conclusions: Transfemoral transcaval access proved to be a feasible and safe TAVI approach for highrisk patients with severe aortic stenosis not suitable for transfemoral or transaxillary/subclavian transarterial access.

KW - Aortic stenosis

KW - Other

KW - TAVI

U2 - 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00797

DO - 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00797

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31659987

AN - SCOPUS:85083074515

VL - 15

SP - E1319-E1324

JO - EuroIntervention

JF - EuroIntervention

SN - 1774-024X

IS - 15

ER -

ID: 250168445