Feasibility and safety of prehospital administration of bivalirudin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Feasibility and safety of prehospital administration of bivalirudin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. / Sejersten, Maria; Nielsen, Søren Loumann; Engstrøm, Thomas; Jørgensen, Erik; Clemmensen, Peter.

I: American Journal of Cardiology, Bind 103, Nr. 12, 2009, s. 1635-40.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Sejersten, M, Nielsen, SL, Engstrøm, T, Jørgensen, E & Clemmensen, P 2009, 'Feasibility and safety of prehospital administration of bivalirudin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction', American Journal of Cardiology, bind 103, nr. 12, s. 1635-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.02.015

APA

Sejersten, M., Nielsen, S. L., Engstrøm, T., Jørgensen, E., & Clemmensen, P. (2009). Feasibility and safety of prehospital administration of bivalirudin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. American Journal of Cardiology, 103(12), 1635-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.02.015

Vancouver

Sejersten M, Nielsen SL, Engstrøm T, Jørgensen E, Clemmensen P. Feasibility and safety of prehospital administration of bivalirudin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. American Journal of Cardiology. 2009;103(12):1635-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.02.015

Author

Sejersten, Maria ; Nielsen, Søren Loumann ; Engstrøm, Thomas ; Jørgensen, Erik ; Clemmensen, Peter. / Feasibility and safety of prehospital administration of bivalirudin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. I: American Journal of Cardiology. 2009 ; Bind 103, Nr. 12. s. 1635-40.

Bibtex

@article{0217116067d711df928f000ea68e967b,
title = "Feasibility and safety of prehospital administration of bivalirudin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction",
abstract = "The selective thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin with a provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) has been shown to be comparable to heparin plus GPI in the rates of ischemic events but to significantly reduce the risk of bleeding complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The aim of this preliminary study was to describe the feasibility and safety of a switch from prehospital administration of unfractionated heparin to bivalirudin in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients with STEMI treated with a 1-mg/kg bivalirudin bolus in the ambulance followed by infusion during angiography/primary percutaneous coronary intervention were compared with a STEMI control group (from the preceding year) treated with 10,000 U unfractionated heparin in the ambulance followed by in-hospital treatment with a GPI. A total of 102 patients (59%) receiving bivalirudin and 72 receiving heparin were followed during hospitalization. The baseline characteristics and prehospital treatment times were comparable between the 2 groups. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow before and after primary percutaneous coronary intervention was similar. Stents were used significantly more often in the heparin-treated patients (90% versus 76%; p = 0.04), with bailout GPI for those receiving bivalirudin occurring in 30% compared with 83% of those receiving heparin (p <0.001). Significant bleeding complications were seen in <10% of all patients undergoing angiography with no difference between groups. Bivalirudin was easy to administer in the prehospital setting and did not affect the prehospital run times. In conclusion, the results suggest that prehospital bivalirudin administration is as safe and effective as heparin in the treatment of patients with STEMI. Prehospital administration seemed to reduce the need for GPI.",
author = "Maria Sejersten and Nielsen, {S{\o}ren Loumann} and Thomas Engstr{\o}m and Erik J{\o}rgensen and Peter Clemmensen",
note = "Keywords: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electrocardiography; Emergency Medical Services; Feasibility Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hirudins; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Peptide Fragments; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Recombinant Proteins; Treatment Outcome",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.02.015",
language = "English",
volume = "103",
pages = "1635--40",
journal = "Am. J. Cardiol.",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility and safety of prehospital administration of bivalirudin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

AU - Sejersten, Maria

AU - Nielsen, Søren Loumann

AU - Engstrøm, Thomas

AU - Jørgensen, Erik

AU - Clemmensen, Peter

N1 - Keywords: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electrocardiography; Emergency Medical Services; Feasibility Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hirudins; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Peptide Fragments; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Recombinant Proteins; Treatment Outcome

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The selective thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin with a provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) has been shown to be comparable to heparin plus GPI in the rates of ischemic events but to significantly reduce the risk of bleeding complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The aim of this preliminary study was to describe the feasibility and safety of a switch from prehospital administration of unfractionated heparin to bivalirudin in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients with STEMI treated with a 1-mg/kg bivalirudin bolus in the ambulance followed by infusion during angiography/primary percutaneous coronary intervention were compared with a STEMI control group (from the preceding year) treated with 10,000 U unfractionated heparin in the ambulance followed by in-hospital treatment with a GPI. A total of 102 patients (59%) receiving bivalirudin and 72 receiving heparin were followed during hospitalization. The baseline characteristics and prehospital treatment times were comparable between the 2 groups. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow before and after primary percutaneous coronary intervention was similar. Stents were used significantly more often in the heparin-treated patients (90% versus 76%; p = 0.04), with bailout GPI for those receiving bivalirudin occurring in 30% compared with 83% of those receiving heparin (p <0.001). Significant bleeding complications were seen in <10% of all patients undergoing angiography with no difference between groups. Bivalirudin was easy to administer in the prehospital setting and did not affect the prehospital run times. In conclusion, the results suggest that prehospital bivalirudin administration is as safe and effective as heparin in the treatment of patients with STEMI. Prehospital administration seemed to reduce the need for GPI.

AB - The selective thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin with a provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) has been shown to be comparable to heparin plus GPI in the rates of ischemic events but to significantly reduce the risk of bleeding complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The aim of this preliminary study was to describe the feasibility and safety of a switch from prehospital administration of unfractionated heparin to bivalirudin in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients with STEMI treated with a 1-mg/kg bivalirudin bolus in the ambulance followed by infusion during angiography/primary percutaneous coronary intervention were compared with a STEMI control group (from the preceding year) treated with 10,000 U unfractionated heparin in the ambulance followed by in-hospital treatment with a GPI. A total of 102 patients (59%) receiving bivalirudin and 72 receiving heparin were followed during hospitalization. The baseline characteristics and prehospital treatment times were comparable between the 2 groups. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow before and after primary percutaneous coronary intervention was similar. Stents were used significantly more often in the heparin-treated patients (90% versus 76%; p = 0.04), with bailout GPI for those receiving bivalirudin occurring in 30% compared with 83% of those receiving heparin (p <0.001). Significant bleeding complications were seen in <10% of all patients undergoing angiography with no difference between groups. Bivalirudin was easy to administer in the prehospital setting and did not affect the prehospital run times. In conclusion, the results suggest that prehospital bivalirudin administration is as safe and effective as heparin in the treatment of patients with STEMI. Prehospital administration seemed to reduce the need for GPI.

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.02.015

DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.02.015

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 19539068

VL - 103

SP - 1635

EP - 1640

JO - Am. J. Cardiol.

JF - Am. J. Cardiol.

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 12

ER -

ID: 19951903