False-positive result when a diphenylcarbazide spot test is used on trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surfaces

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

False-positive result when a diphenylcarbazide spot test is used on trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surfaces. / Reveko, Valeriia; Lampert, Felix; Din, Rameez U.; Thyssen, Jacob P.; Møller, Per.

I: Contact Dermatitis, Bind 78, Nr. 5, 2018, s. 315-320.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Reveko, V, Lampert, F, Din, RU, Thyssen, JP & Møller, P 2018, 'False-positive result when a diphenylcarbazide spot test is used on trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surfaces', Contact Dermatitis, bind 78, nr. 5, s. 315-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12955

APA

Reveko, V., Lampert, F., Din, R. U., Thyssen, J. P., & Møller, P. (2018). False-positive result when a diphenylcarbazide spot test is used on trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surfaces. Contact Dermatitis, 78(5), 315-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12955

Vancouver

Reveko V, Lampert F, Din RU, Thyssen JP, Møller P. False-positive result when a diphenylcarbazide spot test is used on trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surfaces. Contact Dermatitis. 2018;78(5):315-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12955

Author

Reveko, Valeriia ; Lampert, Felix ; Din, Rameez U. ; Thyssen, Jacob P. ; Møller, Per. / False-positive result when a diphenylcarbazide spot test is used on trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surfaces. I: Contact Dermatitis. 2018 ; Bind 78, Nr. 5. s. 315-320.

Bibtex

@article{10fd7a2c265f441a849b5571ec52de9c,
title = "False-positive result when a diphenylcarbazide spot test is used on trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surfaces",
abstract = "Background: A colorimetric 1,5-diphenylcarbazide (DPC)-based spot test can be used to identify hexavalent chromium on various metallic and leather surfaces. DPC testing on trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surfaces has unexpectedly given positive results in some cases, apparently indicating the presence of hexavalent chromium; however, the presence of hexavalent chromium has never been confirmed with more sensitive and accurate test methods. Objectives: To examine the presence of hexavalent chromium on trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surfaces with a DPC-based spot test. Methods: A colorimetric DPC spot test was used for the initial detection of hexavalent chromium on new and 1-year-aged trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surfaces. Then, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed for all samples. Results: The DPC spot test indicated the presence of hexavalent chromium in aged, but not new, trivalent chromium passivation on zinc; however, subsequent analysis by XPS could not confirm the presence of chromium in a hexavalent state. Conclusions: Unintended oxidation of DPC induced by atmospheric corrosion is suggested as a possible reason for the false-positive reaction of the DPC test on a trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surface. Further validation of the use of the DPC test for chromium-containing metallic surfaces is required.",
keywords = "contact allergy, DPC spot test, EU regulation, false-positive result, hexavalent chromium, trivalent chromium passivation of zinc",
author = "Valeriia Reveko and Felix Lampert and Din, {Rameez U.} and Thyssen, {Jacob P.} and Per M{\o}ller",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1111/cod.12955",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "315--320",
journal = "Contact Dermatitis",
issn = "0105-1873",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - False-positive result when a diphenylcarbazide spot test is used on trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surfaces

AU - Reveko, Valeriia

AU - Lampert, Felix

AU - Din, Rameez U.

AU - Thyssen, Jacob P.

AU - Møller, Per

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Background: A colorimetric 1,5-diphenylcarbazide (DPC)-based spot test can be used to identify hexavalent chromium on various metallic and leather surfaces. DPC testing on trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surfaces has unexpectedly given positive results in some cases, apparently indicating the presence of hexavalent chromium; however, the presence of hexavalent chromium has never been confirmed with more sensitive and accurate test methods. Objectives: To examine the presence of hexavalent chromium on trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surfaces with a DPC-based spot test. Methods: A colorimetric DPC spot test was used for the initial detection of hexavalent chromium on new and 1-year-aged trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surfaces. Then, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed for all samples. Results: The DPC spot test indicated the presence of hexavalent chromium in aged, but not new, trivalent chromium passivation on zinc; however, subsequent analysis by XPS could not confirm the presence of chromium in a hexavalent state. Conclusions: Unintended oxidation of DPC induced by atmospheric corrosion is suggested as a possible reason for the false-positive reaction of the DPC test on a trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surface. Further validation of the use of the DPC test for chromium-containing metallic surfaces is required.

AB - Background: A colorimetric 1,5-diphenylcarbazide (DPC)-based spot test can be used to identify hexavalent chromium on various metallic and leather surfaces. DPC testing on trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surfaces has unexpectedly given positive results in some cases, apparently indicating the presence of hexavalent chromium; however, the presence of hexavalent chromium has never been confirmed with more sensitive and accurate test methods. Objectives: To examine the presence of hexavalent chromium on trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surfaces with a DPC-based spot test. Methods: A colorimetric DPC spot test was used for the initial detection of hexavalent chromium on new and 1-year-aged trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surfaces. Then, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed for all samples. Results: The DPC spot test indicated the presence of hexavalent chromium in aged, but not new, trivalent chromium passivation on zinc; however, subsequent analysis by XPS could not confirm the presence of chromium in a hexavalent state. Conclusions: Unintended oxidation of DPC induced by atmospheric corrosion is suggested as a possible reason for the false-positive reaction of the DPC test on a trivalent chromium-passivated zinc surface. Further validation of the use of the DPC test for chromium-containing metallic surfaces is required.

KW - contact allergy

KW - DPC spot test

KW - EU regulation

KW - false-positive result

KW - hexavalent chromium

KW - trivalent chromium passivation of zinc

U2 - 10.1111/cod.12955

DO - 10.1111/cod.12955

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29341169

AN - SCOPUS:85040708481

VL - 78

SP - 315

EP - 320

JO - Contact Dermatitis

JF - Contact Dermatitis

SN - 0105-1873

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 217393694