Endoscopic treatment of colorectal perforations – a systematic review
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Endoscopic treatment of colorectal perforations – a systematic review. / Hassan, Mohamed Ali; Thomsen, Christian Øystein; Vilmann, Peter.
I: Danish Medical Journal, Bind 63, Nr. 4, A5220, 04.2016.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Endoscopic treatment of colorectal perforations – a systematic review
AU - Hassan, Mohamed Ali
AU - Thomsen, Christian Øystein
AU - Vilmann, Peter
PY - 2016/4
Y1 - 2016/4
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic colon perforation is a feared complication to colonoscopy. Optimal management of the complication remains controversial. Traditionally, patients have been referred to surgery. Now, with technological advances, endoscopic closure is increasingly performed as minimally invasive therapy. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the existing evidence in this field.METHODS: Literature was searched on PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane databases. Papers found were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Trials on animals were excluded.RESULTS: A total of 32 articles were assessed, including 19 case reports, one case control, three prospective studies and nine retrospective studies. The total number of patients who have undergone endoscopic closure (apart from case reports) and reported in the literature is 203 patients. Studies have reported a clinical success rate of 87.8% (standard deviation: ± 13.0%) on average and a median of 92.3% (range: 58.6-100%). The total number of patients needing surgery after attempted clip closure was 30 (14.7%); another four were found to have sealed perforations during surgery. One patient died after clip failure (0.5%). Articles presented a favourable, high outcome for endoscopic closure of iatrogenic colorectal perforations.CONCLUSION: In a highly selective group of patients, endoscopic closure of iatrogenic colon perforations is recommended if the expertise is available.
AB - INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic colon perforation is a feared complication to colonoscopy. Optimal management of the complication remains controversial. Traditionally, patients have been referred to surgery. Now, with technological advances, endoscopic closure is increasingly performed as minimally invasive therapy. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the existing evidence in this field.METHODS: Literature was searched on PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane databases. Papers found were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Trials on animals were excluded.RESULTS: A total of 32 articles were assessed, including 19 case reports, one case control, three prospective studies and nine retrospective studies. The total number of patients who have undergone endoscopic closure (apart from case reports) and reported in the literature is 203 patients. Studies have reported a clinical success rate of 87.8% (standard deviation: ± 13.0%) on average and a median of 92.3% (range: 58.6-100%). The total number of patients needing surgery after attempted clip closure was 30 (14.7%); another four were found to have sealed perforations during surgery. One patient died after clip failure (0.5%). Articles presented a favourable, high outcome for endoscopic closure of iatrogenic colorectal perforations.CONCLUSION: In a highly selective group of patients, endoscopic closure of iatrogenic colon perforations is recommended if the expertise is available.
KW - Colon
KW - Colonoscopy
KW - Endoscopy, Digestive System
KW - Humans
KW - Intestinal Perforation
KW - Rectum
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Journal Article
KW - Review
M3 - Review
C2 - 27034185
VL - 63
JO - Danish Medical Journal
JF - Danish Medical Journal
SN - 2245-1919
IS - 4
M1 - A5220
ER -
ID: 181060947