Effect of KATP channel blocker glibenclamide on levcromakalim-induced headache

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Effect of KATP channel blocker glibenclamide on levcromakalim-induced headache. / Al-Karagholi, Mohammad Al Mahdi; Ghanizada, Hashmat; Kokoti, Lili; Paulsen, Joachim S.; Hansen, Jakob Møller; Ashina, Messoud.

I: Cephalalgia, Bind 40, Nr. 10, 2020, s. 1045-1054.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Al-Karagholi, MAM, Ghanizada, H, Kokoti, L, Paulsen, JS, Hansen, JM & Ashina, M 2020, 'Effect of KATP channel blocker glibenclamide on levcromakalim-induced headache', Cephalalgia, bind 40, nr. 10, s. 1045-1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102420949863

APA

Al-Karagholi, M. A. M., Ghanizada, H., Kokoti, L., Paulsen, J. S., Hansen, J. M., & Ashina, M. (2020). Effect of KATP channel blocker glibenclamide on levcromakalim-induced headache. Cephalalgia, 40(10), 1045-1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102420949863

Vancouver

Al-Karagholi MAM, Ghanizada H, Kokoti L, Paulsen JS, Hansen JM, Ashina M. Effect of KATP channel blocker glibenclamide on levcromakalim-induced headache. Cephalalgia. 2020;40(10):1045-1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102420949863

Author

Al-Karagholi, Mohammad Al Mahdi ; Ghanizada, Hashmat ; Kokoti, Lili ; Paulsen, Joachim S. ; Hansen, Jakob Møller ; Ashina, Messoud. / Effect of KATP channel blocker glibenclamide on levcromakalim-induced headache. I: Cephalalgia. 2020 ; Bind 40, Nr. 10. s. 1045-1054.

Bibtex

@article{7bf949cf02a14bca80fe0a74537357f9,
title = "Effect of KATP channel blocker glibenclamide on levcromakalim-induced headache",
abstract = "Introduction: Administration of ATP-sensitive potassium channel opener levcromakalim triggers headache in healthy volunteers and migraine attacks in migraine patients. Here, we investigated the effect of ATP-sensitive potassium channel blocker glibenclamide on levcromakalim-induced headache in healthy volunteers. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way cross-over study, 15 healthy volunteers aged 18–40 years were randomly allocated to receive glibenclamide and levcromakalim (day 1), glibenclamide and placebo (day 2), and placebo and placebo (day 3) on three different days separated by at least 1 week. The primary endpoints were the difference in incidence of headache and the difference in area under the curve for headache intensity scores (0–12 hours) between the days. Results: Fifteen healthy volunteers completed the 3 days of the study. More participants (12/15, 80%) developed headache on the glibenclamide-levcromakalim day compared to the glibenclamide-placebo day (5/15, 33%) (p = 0.01; mean difference 47%; 95% confidence interval 18–75%) and compared to the placebo-placebo day (1/15, 7%) (p = 0.001; mean difference 73%; 95% confidence interval 48–99%). We found no difference in headache incidence between glibenclamide-placebo day and placebo-placebo day (p = 0.12; mean difference 27%; 95% confidence interval 1.3–52%). The area under the curve for headache intensity was significantly larger on the glibenclamide-levcromakalim day compared to the glibenclamide-placebo day (p = 0.003); and compared to the placebo-placebo day (p = 0.001). We found no difference in the area under the curve between the glibenclamide-placebo day compared to the placebo-placebo day (p = 0.07). The median time to onset for headache after levcromakalim infusion with glibenclamide pretreatment was delayed (180 min) compared to levcromakalim without pretreatment (30 min) from a previously published study. Conclusion: Glibenclamide administration did not cause headache, and glibenclamide pretreatment did not prevent levcromakalim-induced headache. However, glibenclamide delayed the onset of levcromakalim-induced headache. More selective blockers are needed to further elucidate the role of the ATP-sensitive potassium channel in headache initiation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03886922.",
keywords = "cromakalim, glyburide, Human models, migraine",
author = "Al-Karagholi, {Mohammad Al Mahdi} and Hashmat Ghanizada and Lili Kokoti and Paulsen, {Joachim S.} and Hansen, {Jakob M{\o}ller} and Messoud Ashina",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1177/0333102420949863",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "1045--1054",
journal = "Cephalalgia",
issn = "0800-1952",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of KATP channel blocker glibenclamide on levcromakalim-induced headache

AU - Al-Karagholi, Mohammad Al Mahdi

AU - Ghanizada, Hashmat

AU - Kokoti, Lili

AU - Paulsen, Joachim S.

AU - Hansen, Jakob Møller

AU - Ashina, Messoud

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Introduction: Administration of ATP-sensitive potassium channel opener levcromakalim triggers headache in healthy volunteers and migraine attacks in migraine patients. Here, we investigated the effect of ATP-sensitive potassium channel blocker glibenclamide on levcromakalim-induced headache in healthy volunteers. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way cross-over study, 15 healthy volunteers aged 18–40 years were randomly allocated to receive glibenclamide and levcromakalim (day 1), glibenclamide and placebo (day 2), and placebo and placebo (day 3) on three different days separated by at least 1 week. The primary endpoints were the difference in incidence of headache and the difference in area under the curve for headache intensity scores (0–12 hours) between the days. Results: Fifteen healthy volunteers completed the 3 days of the study. More participants (12/15, 80%) developed headache on the glibenclamide-levcromakalim day compared to the glibenclamide-placebo day (5/15, 33%) (p = 0.01; mean difference 47%; 95% confidence interval 18–75%) and compared to the placebo-placebo day (1/15, 7%) (p = 0.001; mean difference 73%; 95% confidence interval 48–99%). We found no difference in headache incidence between glibenclamide-placebo day and placebo-placebo day (p = 0.12; mean difference 27%; 95% confidence interval 1.3–52%). The area under the curve for headache intensity was significantly larger on the glibenclamide-levcromakalim day compared to the glibenclamide-placebo day (p = 0.003); and compared to the placebo-placebo day (p = 0.001). We found no difference in the area under the curve between the glibenclamide-placebo day compared to the placebo-placebo day (p = 0.07). The median time to onset for headache after levcromakalim infusion with glibenclamide pretreatment was delayed (180 min) compared to levcromakalim without pretreatment (30 min) from a previously published study. Conclusion: Glibenclamide administration did not cause headache, and glibenclamide pretreatment did not prevent levcromakalim-induced headache. However, glibenclamide delayed the onset of levcromakalim-induced headache. More selective blockers are needed to further elucidate the role of the ATP-sensitive potassium channel in headache initiation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03886922.

AB - Introduction: Administration of ATP-sensitive potassium channel opener levcromakalim triggers headache in healthy volunteers and migraine attacks in migraine patients. Here, we investigated the effect of ATP-sensitive potassium channel blocker glibenclamide on levcromakalim-induced headache in healthy volunteers. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way cross-over study, 15 healthy volunteers aged 18–40 years were randomly allocated to receive glibenclamide and levcromakalim (day 1), glibenclamide and placebo (day 2), and placebo and placebo (day 3) on three different days separated by at least 1 week. The primary endpoints were the difference in incidence of headache and the difference in area under the curve for headache intensity scores (0–12 hours) between the days. Results: Fifteen healthy volunteers completed the 3 days of the study. More participants (12/15, 80%) developed headache on the glibenclamide-levcromakalim day compared to the glibenclamide-placebo day (5/15, 33%) (p = 0.01; mean difference 47%; 95% confidence interval 18–75%) and compared to the placebo-placebo day (1/15, 7%) (p = 0.001; mean difference 73%; 95% confidence interval 48–99%). We found no difference in headache incidence between glibenclamide-placebo day and placebo-placebo day (p = 0.12; mean difference 27%; 95% confidence interval 1.3–52%). The area under the curve for headache intensity was significantly larger on the glibenclamide-levcromakalim day compared to the glibenclamide-placebo day (p = 0.003); and compared to the placebo-placebo day (p = 0.001). We found no difference in the area under the curve between the glibenclamide-placebo day compared to the placebo-placebo day (p = 0.07). The median time to onset for headache after levcromakalim infusion with glibenclamide pretreatment was delayed (180 min) compared to levcromakalim without pretreatment (30 min) from a previously published study. Conclusion: Glibenclamide administration did not cause headache, and glibenclamide pretreatment did not prevent levcromakalim-induced headache. However, glibenclamide delayed the onset of levcromakalim-induced headache. More selective blockers are needed to further elucidate the role of the ATP-sensitive potassium channel in headache initiation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03886922.

KW - cromakalim

KW - glyburide

KW - Human models

KW - migraine

U2 - 10.1177/0333102420949863

DO - 10.1177/0333102420949863

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32806954

AN - SCOPUS:85089529064

VL - 40

SP - 1045

EP - 1054

JO - Cephalalgia

JF - Cephalalgia

SN - 0800-1952

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 258776140