Effect of high-volume systematic local infiltration analgesia in Caesarean section: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Effect of high-volume systematic local infiltration analgesia in Caesarean section : a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. / Larsen, Klaus Richter; Kristensen, B B; Rasmussen, M A; Rasmussen, Y H; Weber, T.; Kristensen, B; Kehlet, H.

I: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Bind 59, Nr. 5, 05.2015, s. 632-9.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Larsen, KR, Kristensen, BB, Rasmussen, MA, Rasmussen, YH, Weber, T, Kristensen, B & Kehlet, H 2015, 'Effect of high-volume systematic local infiltration analgesia in Caesarean section: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial', Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, bind 59, nr. 5, s. 632-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12509

APA

Larsen, K. R., Kristensen, B. B., Rasmussen, M. A., Rasmussen, Y. H., Weber, T., Kristensen, B., & Kehlet, H. (2015). Effect of high-volume systematic local infiltration analgesia in Caesarean section: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 59(5), 632-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12509

Vancouver

Larsen KR, Kristensen BB, Rasmussen MA, Rasmussen YH, Weber T, Kristensen B o.a. Effect of high-volume systematic local infiltration analgesia in Caesarean section: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2015 maj;59(5):632-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12509

Author

Larsen, Klaus Richter ; Kristensen, B B ; Rasmussen, M A ; Rasmussen, Y H ; Weber, T. ; Kristensen, B ; Kehlet, H. / Effect of high-volume systematic local infiltration analgesia in Caesarean section : a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. I: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2015 ; Bind 59, Nr. 5. s. 632-9.

Bibtex

@article{17a02fc6cda04be2a0cf8e55f26786da,
title = "Effect of high-volume systematic local infiltration analgesia in Caesarean section: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Pain after Caesarean section is often treated with opioids with a risk of side effects. Wound infiltration with local anaesthetics is effective and has few side effects, but volume vs. dose concentration has not been examined.METHODS: Ninety patients scheduled for elective Caesarean section included in a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial receiving infiltration with 50 ml ropivacaine 0.5% or 125 ml ropivacaine 0.2% or 50 ml 0.9% saline (placebo) during surgery. Surgery was performed under lumbar spinal anaesthesia. Primary endpoint was post-operative pain. Secondary endpoints were rescue analgesic, post-operative nausea and vomiting, time spent in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and time to first mobilisation.RESULTS: No difference in pain response between groups, but time until maximum pain score was prolonged in the ropivacaine 0.5% group compared with the placebo group (P = 0.0493). The administration of ketobemidone at 24 h post-operatively in the ropivacaine 0.5% group was reduced compared with the placebo group (P = 0.020), and between the ropivacaine 0.2% group and the ropivacaine 0.5% group (P = 0.044). No significant differences between groups were found concerning time spent in the PACU, to first mobilisation or in number of women with nausea/vomiting (P ≥ 0.05). No complications related to ropivacaine were observed.CONCLUSIONS: Systematic infiltration with a high concentration, low volume compared with low concentration, high volume showed no significant effect on post-operative pain intensity. However, a statistically significant, but clinically limited opioid sparing effect was demonstrated compared with placebo in the high concentration, low volume group.",
keywords = "Adult, Amides, Analgesia, Obstetrical, Analgesics, Opioid, Anesthesia, Local, Anesthetics, Local, Cesarean Section, Double-Blind Method, Endpoint Determination, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Pain Measurement, Pain, Postoperative, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting, Pregnancy, Sufentanil",
author = "Larsen, {Klaus Richter} and Kristensen, {B B} and Rasmussen, {M A} and Rasmussen, {Y H} and T. Weber and B Kristensen and H Kehlet",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2015 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2015",
month = may,
doi = "10.1111/aas.12509",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "632--9",
journal = "Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-5172",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of high-volume systematic local infiltration analgesia in Caesarean section

T2 - a randomised, placebo-controlled trial

AU - Larsen, Klaus Richter

AU - Kristensen, B B

AU - Rasmussen, M A

AU - Rasmussen, Y H

AU - Weber, T.

AU - Kristensen, B

AU - Kehlet, H

N1 - © 2015 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2015/5

Y1 - 2015/5

N2 - BACKGROUND: Pain after Caesarean section is often treated with opioids with a risk of side effects. Wound infiltration with local anaesthetics is effective and has few side effects, but volume vs. dose concentration has not been examined.METHODS: Ninety patients scheduled for elective Caesarean section included in a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial receiving infiltration with 50 ml ropivacaine 0.5% or 125 ml ropivacaine 0.2% or 50 ml 0.9% saline (placebo) during surgery. Surgery was performed under lumbar spinal anaesthesia. Primary endpoint was post-operative pain. Secondary endpoints were rescue analgesic, post-operative nausea and vomiting, time spent in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and time to first mobilisation.RESULTS: No difference in pain response between groups, but time until maximum pain score was prolonged in the ropivacaine 0.5% group compared with the placebo group (P = 0.0493). The administration of ketobemidone at 24 h post-operatively in the ropivacaine 0.5% group was reduced compared with the placebo group (P = 0.020), and between the ropivacaine 0.2% group and the ropivacaine 0.5% group (P = 0.044). No significant differences between groups were found concerning time spent in the PACU, to first mobilisation or in number of women with nausea/vomiting (P ≥ 0.05). No complications related to ropivacaine were observed.CONCLUSIONS: Systematic infiltration with a high concentration, low volume compared with low concentration, high volume showed no significant effect on post-operative pain intensity. However, a statistically significant, but clinically limited opioid sparing effect was demonstrated compared with placebo in the high concentration, low volume group.

AB - BACKGROUND: Pain after Caesarean section is often treated with opioids with a risk of side effects. Wound infiltration with local anaesthetics is effective and has few side effects, but volume vs. dose concentration has not been examined.METHODS: Ninety patients scheduled for elective Caesarean section included in a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial receiving infiltration with 50 ml ropivacaine 0.5% or 125 ml ropivacaine 0.2% or 50 ml 0.9% saline (placebo) during surgery. Surgery was performed under lumbar spinal anaesthesia. Primary endpoint was post-operative pain. Secondary endpoints were rescue analgesic, post-operative nausea and vomiting, time spent in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and time to first mobilisation.RESULTS: No difference in pain response between groups, but time until maximum pain score was prolonged in the ropivacaine 0.5% group compared with the placebo group (P = 0.0493). The administration of ketobemidone at 24 h post-operatively in the ropivacaine 0.5% group was reduced compared with the placebo group (P = 0.020), and between the ropivacaine 0.2% group and the ropivacaine 0.5% group (P = 0.044). No significant differences between groups were found concerning time spent in the PACU, to first mobilisation or in number of women with nausea/vomiting (P ≥ 0.05). No complications related to ropivacaine were observed.CONCLUSIONS: Systematic infiltration with a high concentration, low volume compared with low concentration, high volume showed no significant effect on post-operative pain intensity. However, a statistically significant, but clinically limited opioid sparing effect was demonstrated compared with placebo in the high concentration, low volume group.

KW - Adult

KW - Amides

KW - Analgesia, Obstetrical

KW - Analgesics, Opioid

KW - Anesthesia, Local

KW - Anesthetics, Local

KW - Cesarean Section

KW - Double-Blind Method

KW - Endpoint Determination

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Infant, Newborn

KW - Pain Measurement

KW - Pain, Postoperative

KW - Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

KW - Pregnancy

KW - Sufentanil

U2 - 10.1111/aas.12509

DO - 10.1111/aas.12509

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25786811

VL - 59

SP - 632

EP - 639

JO - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-5172

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 162693601