Educational interventions to improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation—a systematic review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Educational interventions to improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation—a systematic review. / Palm, Pernille; Qvist, Ina; Rasmussen, Trine Bernholdt; Christensen, Signe Westh; Håkonsen, Sasja Jul; Risom, Signe Stelling.

I: International Journal of Clinical Practice, Bind 74, Nr. 11, e13629, 2020.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Palm, P, Qvist, I, Rasmussen, TB, Christensen, SW, Håkonsen, SJ & Risom, SS 2020, 'Educational interventions to improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation—a systematic review', International Journal of Clinical Practice, bind 74, nr. 11, e13629. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13629

APA

Palm, P., Qvist, I., Rasmussen, T. B., Christensen, S. W., Håkonsen, S. J., & Risom, S. S. (2020). Educational interventions to improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation—a systematic review. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 74(11), [e13629]. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13629

Vancouver

Palm P, Qvist I, Rasmussen TB, Christensen SW, Håkonsen SJ, Risom SS. Educational interventions to improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation—a systematic review. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2020;74(11). e13629. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13629

Author

Palm, Pernille ; Qvist, Ina ; Rasmussen, Trine Bernholdt ; Christensen, Signe Westh ; Håkonsen, Sasja Jul ; Risom, Signe Stelling. / Educational interventions to improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation—a systematic review. I: International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2020 ; Bind 74, Nr. 11.

Bibtex

@article{a1686c268ccb48359da3228206abfbd2,
title = "Educational interventions to improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation—a systematic review",
abstract = "Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an emerging epidemic associated with poor mental health and quality of life, as well as morbidity and mortality. Whilst other cardiovascular conditions have demonstrated positive outcomes from educational programmes, this approach is not well integrated in clinical practice in patients with AF. Though evidence in this area is mounting, a thorough overview seems to be lacking. Aim: To assess benefits and harms of educational interventions compared with no intervention in adults with AF. Method: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed including the outcomes: Serious adverse events (mortality and readmission), mental health (anxiety and depression), physical capacity, quality of life and self-reported incidence of symptoms of AF. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO were searched between June and august 2018. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was applied for the randomised controlled trials and the Amstar Checklist for the systematic reviews. Results: Eight randomised controlled trials and one non-randomised interventional study were included, with a total of 2388 patients. Comparing with controls patient education was associated with a reduction in: Serious adverse events (Risk Ratio 0.78, CI 95% 0.63-0.97), anxiety with a mean difference of −0.62 (CI 95% −1.21, −0.04) and depression with a mean difference of −0.74 (CI 95% −1.34, −0.14). Health-related quality of life and physical capacity was found to increase after patient education, yet, only one study found statistically significant differences between groups. No differences were observed with regards to self-reported incidence of symptoms of AF. Conclusions: Educational interventions significantly decrease the number of serious adverse events in patients with AF and seem to have a positive impact on mental health and self-reported quality of life. However, the evidence is limited, and more studies are warranted.",
author = "Pernille Palm and Ina Qvist and Rasmussen, {Trine Bernholdt} and Christensen, {Signe Westh} and H{\aa}konsen, {Sasja Jul} and Risom, {Signe Stelling}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1111/ijcp.13629",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
journal = "British Journal of Clinical Practice",
issn = "1368-504X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Educational interventions to improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation—a systematic review

AU - Palm, Pernille

AU - Qvist, Ina

AU - Rasmussen, Trine Bernholdt

AU - Christensen, Signe Westh

AU - Håkonsen, Sasja Jul

AU - Risom, Signe Stelling

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an emerging epidemic associated with poor mental health and quality of life, as well as morbidity and mortality. Whilst other cardiovascular conditions have demonstrated positive outcomes from educational programmes, this approach is not well integrated in clinical practice in patients with AF. Though evidence in this area is mounting, a thorough overview seems to be lacking. Aim: To assess benefits and harms of educational interventions compared with no intervention in adults with AF. Method: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed including the outcomes: Serious adverse events (mortality and readmission), mental health (anxiety and depression), physical capacity, quality of life and self-reported incidence of symptoms of AF. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO were searched between June and august 2018. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was applied for the randomised controlled trials and the Amstar Checklist for the systematic reviews. Results: Eight randomised controlled trials and one non-randomised interventional study were included, with a total of 2388 patients. Comparing with controls patient education was associated with a reduction in: Serious adverse events (Risk Ratio 0.78, CI 95% 0.63-0.97), anxiety with a mean difference of −0.62 (CI 95% −1.21, −0.04) and depression with a mean difference of −0.74 (CI 95% −1.34, −0.14). Health-related quality of life and physical capacity was found to increase after patient education, yet, only one study found statistically significant differences between groups. No differences were observed with regards to self-reported incidence of symptoms of AF. Conclusions: Educational interventions significantly decrease the number of serious adverse events in patients with AF and seem to have a positive impact on mental health and self-reported quality of life. However, the evidence is limited, and more studies are warranted.

AB - Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an emerging epidemic associated with poor mental health and quality of life, as well as morbidity and mortality. Whilst other cardiovascular conditions have demonstrated positive outcomes from educational programmes, this approach is not well integrated in clinical practice in patients with AF. Though evidence in this area is mounting, a thorough overview seems to be lacking. Aim: To assess benefits and harms of educational interventions compared with no intervention in adults with AF. Method: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed including the outcomes: Serious adverse events (mortality and readmission), mental health (anxiety and depression), physical capacity, quality of life and self-reported incidence of symptoms of AF. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO were searched between June and august 2018. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was applied for the randomised controlled trials and the Amstar Checklist for the systematic reviews. Results: Eight randomised controlled trials and one non-randomised interventional study were included, with a total of 2388 patients. Comparing with controls patient education was associated with a reduction in: Serious adverse events (Risk Ratio 0.78, CI 95% 0.63-0.97), anxiety with a mean difference of −0.62 (CI 95% −1.21, −0.04) and depression with a mean difference of −0.74 (CI 95% −1.34, −0.14). Health-related quality of life and physical capacity was found to increase after patient education, yet, only one study found statistically significant differences between groups. No differences were observed with regards to self-reported incidence of symptoms of AF. Conclusions: Educational interventions significantly decrease the number of serious adverse events in patients with AF and seem to have a positive impact on mental health and self-reported quality of life. However, the evidence is limited, and more studies are warranted.

U2 - 10.1111/ijcp.13629

DO - 10.1111/ijcp.13629

M3 - Review

C2 - 32726511

AN - SCOPUS:85090312341

VL - 74

JO - British Journal of Clinical Practice

JF - British Journal of Clinical Practice

SN - 1368-504X

IS - 11

M1 - e13629

ER -

ID: 263029264