Dispatch of Volunteer Responders to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Dispatch of Volunteer Responders to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests. / Jonsson, Martin; Berglund, Ellinor; Baldi, Enrico; Caputo, Maria Luce; Auricchio, Angelo; Blom, Marieke T.; Tan, Hanno L.; Stieglis, Remy; Andelius, Linn; Folke, Fredrik; Hollenberg, Jacob; Svensson, Leif; Ringh, Mattias; ESCAPE-NET Investigators.

I: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Bind 82, Nr. 3, 2023, s. 200-210.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jonsson, M, Berglund, E, Baldi, E, Caputo, ML, Auricchio, A, Blom, MT, Tan, HL, Stieglis, R, Andelius, L, Folke, F, Hollenberg, J, Svensson, L, Ringh, M & ESCAPE-NET Investigators 2023, 'Dispatch of Volunteer Responders to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests', Journal of the American College of Cardiology, bind 82, nr. 3, s. 200-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.017

APA

Jonsson, M., Berglund, E., Baldi, E., Caputo, M. L., Auricchio, A., Blom, M. T., Tan, H. L., Stieglis, R., Andelius, L., Folke, F., Hollenberg, J., Svensson, L., Ringh, M., & ESCAPE-NET Investigators (2023). Dispatch of Volunteer Responders to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 82(3), 200-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.017

Vancouver

Jonsson M, Berglund E, Baldi E, Caputo ML, Auricchio A, Blom MT o.a. Dispatch of Volunteer Responders to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2023;82(3):200-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.017

Author

Jonsson, Martin ; Berglund, Ellinor ; Baldi, Enrico ; Caputo, Maria Luce ; Auricchio, Angelo ; Blom, Marieke T. ; Tan, Hanno L. ; Stieglis, Remy ; Andelius, Linn ; Folke, Fredrik ; Hollenberg, Jacob ; Svensson, Leif ; Ringh, Mattias ; ESCAPE-NET Investigators. / Dispatch of Volunteer Responders to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests. I: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2023 ; Bind 82, Nr. 3. s. 200-210.

Bibtex

@article{f36d515e7d274b279d2064f1b2439580,
title = "Dispatch of Volunteer Responders to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests",
abstract = "Background: Systems for dispatch of volunteer responders to collect automated external defibrillators and/or to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in cases of nearby out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are widely implemented. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether the activation of a volunteer responder system to OHCAs was associated with higher rates of bystander CPR, bystander defibrillation, and 30-day survival vs no system activation. Methods: This was a retrospective observational analysis within the ESCAPE-NET (European Sudden Cardiac Arrest network: Towards Prevention, Education, New Effective Treatment) collaborative research network. Included were cases of OHCA between 2015 and 2019 from 5 European sites with volunteer responder systems. At all sites, systems were activated by dispatchers at the emergency medical communication center in response to suspected OHCA. Exposed cases (system activation) were compared with nonexposed cases (no system activation). Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for the outcomes of bystander CPR, bystander defibrillation, and 30-day survival after inverse probability treatment weighting. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation. Results: In total, 9,553 cases were included. In 4,696 cases, the volunteer responder system was activated, and in 4,857 it was not. The pooled RRs were 1.30 (95% CI: 1.15–1.47) for bystander CPR, 1.89 (95% CI: 1.36–2.63) for bystander defibrillation, and 1.22 (95% CI: 1.07–1.39) for 30-day survival. Conclusions: Activation of a volunteer response system in cases of OHCA was associated with a higher chance of bystander CPR, bystander defibrillation, and 30-day survival vs no system activation. A randomized controlled trial is necessary to determine fully the causal effect of volunteer responder systems.",
keywords = "cardiopulmonary resuscitation, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, volunteer responders",
author = "Martin Jonsson and Ellinor Berglund and Enrico Baldi and Caputo, {Maria Luce} and Angelo Auricchio and Blom, {Marieke T.} and Tan, {Hanno L.} and Remy Stieglis and Linn Andelius and Fredrik Folke and Jacob Hollenberg and Leif Svensson and Mattias Ringh and {ESCAPE-NET Investigators}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.017",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "200--210",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dispatch of Volunteer Responders to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests

AU - Jonsson, Martin

AU - Berglund, Ellinor

AU - Baldi, Enrico

AU - Caputo, Maria Luce

AU - Auricchio, Angelo

AU - Blom, Marieke T.

AU - Tan, Hanno L.

AU - Stieglis, Remy

AU - Andelius, Linn

AU - Folke, Fredrik

AU - Hollenberg, Jacob

AU - Svensson, Leif

AU - Ringh, Mattias

AU - ESCAPE-NET Investigators

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Background: Systems for dispatch of volunteer responders to collect automated external defibrillators and/or to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in cases of nearby out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are widely implemented. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether the activation of a volunteer responder system to OHCAs was associated with higher rates of bystander CPR, bystander defibrillation, and 30-day survival vs no system activation. Methods: This was a retrospective observational analysis within the ESCAPE-NET (European Sudden Cardiac Arrest network: Towards Prevention, Education, New Effective Treatment) collaborative research network. Included were cases of OHCA between 2015 and 2019 from 5 European sites with volunteer responder systems. At all sites, systems were activated by dispatchers at the emergency medical communication center in response to suspected OHCA. Exposed cases (system activation) were compared with nonexposed cases (no system activation). Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for the outcomes of bystander CPR, bystander defibrillation, and 30-day survival after inverse probability treatment weighting. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation. Results: In total, 9,553 cases were included. In 4,696 cases, the volunteer responder system was activated, and in 4,857 it was not. The pooled RRs were 1.30 (95% CI: 1.15–1.47) for bystander CPR, 1.89 (95% CI: 1.36–2.63) for bystander defibrillation, and 1.22 (95% CI: 1.07–1.39) for 30-day survival. Conclusions: Activation of a volunteer response system in cases of OHCA was associated with a higher chance of bystander CPR, bystander defibrillation, and 30-day survival vs no system activation. A randomized controlled trial is necessary to determine fully the causal effect of volunteer responder systems.

AB - Background: Systems for dispatch of volunteer responders to collect automated external defibrillators and/or to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in cases of nearby out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are widely implemented. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether the activation of a volunteer responder system to OHCAs was associated with higher rates of bystander CPR, bystander defibrillation, and 30-day survival vs no system activation. Methods: This was a retrospective observational analysis within the ESCAPE-NET (European Sudden Cardiac Arrest network: Towards Prevention, Education, New Effective Treatment) collaborative research network. Included were cases of OHCA between 2015 and 2019 from 5 European sites with volunteer responder systems. At all sites, systems were activated by dispatchers at the emergency medical communication center in response to suspected OHCA. Exposed cases (system activation) were compared with nonexposed cases (no system activation). Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for the outcomes of bystander CPR, bystander defibrillation, and 30-day survival after inverse probability treatment weighting. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation. Results: In total, 9,553 cases were included. In 4,696 cases, the volunteer responder system was activated, and in 4,857 it was not. The pooled RRs were 1.30 (95% CI: 1.15–1.47) for bystander CPR, 1.89 (95% CI: 1.36–2.63) for bystander defibrillation, and 1.22 (95% CI: 1.07–1.39) for 30-day survival. Conclusions: Activation of a volunteer response system in cases of OHCA was associated with a higher chance of bystander CPR, bystander defibrillation, and 30-day survival vs no system activation. A randomized controlled trial is necessary to determine fully the causal effect of volunteer responder systems.

KW - cardiopulmonary resuscitation

KW - out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

KW - volunteer responders

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.017

DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.017

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37438006

AN - SCOPUS:85163510455

VL - 82

SP - 200

EP - 210

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 363711368