Decision-Support Tools Used in the Baltic Sea Area: Performance and End-User Preferences
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Decision-Support Tools Used in the Baltic Sea Area : Performance and End-User Preferences. / Nygård, Henrik; van Beest, Floris M.; Bergqvist, Lisa; Carstensen, Jacob; Gustafsson, Bo G.; Hasler, Berit; Schumacher, Johanna; Schernewski, Gerald; Sokolov, Alexander; Zandersen, Marianne; Fleming, Vivi.
I: Environmental Management, Bind 66, Nr. 6, 12.2020, s. 1024-1038.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Decision-Support Tools Used in the Baltic Sea Area
T2 - Performance and End-User Preferences
AU - Nygård, Henrik
AU - van Beest, Floris M.
AU - Bergqvist, Lisa
AU - Carstensen, Jacob
AU - Gustafsson, Bo G.
AU - Hasler, Berit
AU - Schumacher, Johanna
AU - Schernewski, Gerald
AU - Sokolov, Alexander
AU - Zandersen, Marianne
AU - Fleming, Vivi
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Decision-support tools (DSTs) synthesize complex information to assist environmental managers in the decision-making process. Here, we review DSTs applied in the Baltic Sea area, to investigate how well the ecosystem approach is reflected in them, how different environmental problems are covered, and how well the tools meet the needs of the end users. The DSTs were evaluated based on (i) a set of performance criteria, (ii) information on end user preferences, (iii) how end users had been involved in tool development, and (iv) what experiences developers/hosts had on the use of the tools. We found that DSTs frequently addressed management needs related to eutrophication, biodiversity loss, or contaminant pollution. The majority of the DSTs addressed human activities, their pressures, or environmental status changes, but they seldom provided solutions for a complete ecosystem approach. In general, the DSTs were scientifically documented and transparent, but confidence in the outputs was poorly communicated. End user preferences were, apart from the shortcomings in communicating uncertainty, well accounted for in the DSTs. Although end users were commonly consulted during the DST development phase, they were not usually part of the development team. Answers from developers/hosts indicate that DSTs are not applied to their full potential. Deeper involvement of end users in the development phase could potentially increase the value and impact of DSTs. As a way forward, we propose streamlining the outputs of specific DSTs, so that they can be combined to a holistic insight of the consequences of management actions and serve the ecosystem approach in a better manner.
AB - Decision-support tools (DSTs) synthesize complex information to assist environmental managers in the decision-making process. Here, we review DSTs applied in the Baltic Sea area, to investigate how well the ecosystem approach is reflected in them, how different environmental problems are covered, and how well the tools meet the needs of the end users. The DSTs were evaluated based on (i) a set of performance criteria, (ii) information on end user preferences, (iii) how end users had been involved in tool development, and (iv) what experiences developers/hosts had on the use of the tools. We found that DSTs frequently addressed management needs related to eutrophication, biodiversity loss, or contaminant pollution. The majority of the DSTs addressed human activities, their pressures, or environmental status changes, but they seldom provided solutions for a complete ecosystem approach. In general, the DSTs were scientifically documented and transparent, but confidence in the outputs was poorly communicated. End user preferences were, apart from the shortcomings in communicating uncertainty, well accounted for in the DSTs. Although end users were commonly consulted during the DST development phase, they were not usually part of the development team. Answers from developers/hosts indicate that DSTs are not applied to their full potential. Deeper involvement of end users in the development phase could potentially increase the value and impact of DSTs. As a way forward, we propose streamlining the outputs of specific DSTs, so that they can be combined to a holistic insight of the consequences of management actions and serve the ecosystem approach in a better manner.
KW - Baltic Sea
KW - DAPSIWRM
KW - Decision-making
KW - Ecosystem approach
KW - Marine management
U2 - 10.1007/s00267-020-01356-8
DO - 10.1007/s00267-020-01356-8
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 32910293
AN - SCOPUS:85090158330
VL - 66
SP - 1024
EP - 1038
JO - Environmental Management
JF - Environmental Management
SN - 0364-152X
IS - 6
ER -
ID: 324690964