Comparison of two electronic dynamometers for measuring handgrip strength

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Comparison of two electronic dynamometers for measuring handgrip strength. / Rolsted, Sebastian Keller; Andersen, Kasper Dyrmose; Dandanell, Gustav; Dall, Christian Have; Zilmer, Camilla Kampp; Bülow, Kasper; Kristensen, Morten Tange.

I: Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation, Bind 43, Nr. 3, 101692, 2024.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Rolsted, SK, Andersen, KD, Dandanell, G, Dall, CH, Zilmer, CK, Bülow, K & Kristensen, MT 2024, 'Comparison of two electronic dynamometers for measuring handgrip strength', Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation, bind 43, nr. 3, 101692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101692

APA

Rolsted, S. K., Andersen, K. D., Dandanell, G., Dall, C. H., Zilmer, C. K., Bülow, K., & Kristensen, M. T. (2024). Comparison of two electronic dynamometers for measuring handgrip strength. Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation, 43(3), [101692]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101692

Vancouver

Rolsted SK, Andersen KD, Dandanell G, Dall CH, Zilmer CK, Bülow K o.a. Comparison of two electronic dynamometers for measuring handgrip strength. Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation. 2024;43(3). 101692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101692

Author

Rolsted, Sebastian Keller ; Andersen, Kasper Dyrmose ; Dandanell, Gustav ; Dall, Christian Have ; Zilmer, Camilla Kampp ; Bülow, Kasper ; Kristensen, Morten Tange. / Comparison of two electronic dynamometers for measuring handgrip strength. I: Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation. 2024 ; Bind 43, Nr. 3.

Bibtex

@article{1538ecb729364e8e8894e6718e072f95,
title = "Comparison of two electronic dynamometers for measuring handgrip strength",
abstract = "Introduction: Handgrip strength (HGS) is a strong predictor and easily applicable assessment, indicating a person's physical condition and health. However, many dynamometers are available; therefore, it is essential to ensure that the results of HGS testing using different dynamometers can be used interchangeably. The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the inter-instrument agreement and criterion validity of the Baseline BIMS Digital Grip Dynamometer in comparison with the Jamar electronic dynamometer (Jamar+). Methods: Seventy participants, aged between 23–88 (five men and five women in each decade from 20 to 80+), performed three attempts with each dynamometer (30-sec break between attempts) in a randomized order and separated with a 5-minute break between dynamometers. Intraclass correlation coefficient (3.1), standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change were used for comparison of the strongest and average strength measured with dynamometers. Jamar+ and Baseline BIMS Digital Grip Dynamometer were new dynamometers and considered calibrated by the manufacturer. Results: The overall Intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent (0.98). An average (SD) difference of 0.68 (2.2) kg (p = 0.04) was seen for the comparison of the strongest attempt for Baseline BIMS minus Jamar+, Correspondingly, for the average of three attempts, it was 0.37 (2.29, p = 0.2) kg. The standard error of measurement (%) and minimal detectable change (%) of the strongest attempt was 1.64 kg (4.2%) and 3.55 kg (9.0%), respectively. Conclusions: Findings indicate low measurement error with high agreement and criterion validity for the comparison of Baseline BIMS Digital Grip Dynamometer and Jamar+ and that results of the two dynamometers can be used interchangeably.",
keywords = "Agreement: Strength, Handgrip, Measurements, Reliability, Validity",
author = "Rolsted, {Sebastian Keller} and Andersen, {Kasper Dyrmose} and Gustav Dandanell and Dall, {Christian Have} and Zilmer, {Camilla Kampp} and Kasper B{\"u}low and Kristensen, {Morten Tange}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 SFCM",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101692",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
journal = "Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation",
issn = "2468-1229",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of two electronic dynamometers for measuring handgrip strength

AU - Rolsted, Sebastian Keller

AU - Andersen, Kasper Dyrmose

AU - Dandanell, Gustav

AU - Dall, Christian Have

AU - Zilmer, Camilla Kampp

AU - Bülow, Kasper

AU - Kristensen, Morten Tange

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 SFCM

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Introduction: Handgrip strength (HGS) is a strong predictor and easily applicable assessment, indicating a person's physical condition and health. However, many dynamometers are available; therefore, it is essential to ensure that the results of HGS testing using different dynamometers can be used interchangeably. The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the inter-instrument agreement and criterion validity of the Baseline BIMS Digital Grip Dynamometer in comparison with the Jamar electronic dynamometer (Jamar+). Methods: Seventy participants, aged between 23–88 (five men and five women in each decade from 20 to 80+), performed three attempts with each dynamometer (30-sec break between attempts) in a randomized order and separated with a 5-minute break between dynamometers. Intraclass correlation coefficient (3.1), standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change were used for comparison of the strongest and average strength measured with dynamometers. Jamar+ and Baseline BIMS Digital Grip Dynamometer were new dynamometers and considered calibrated by the manufacturer. Results: The overall Intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent (0.98). An average (SD) difference of 0.68 (2.2) kg (p = 0.04) was seen for the comparison of the strongest attempt for Baseline BIMS minus Jamar+, Correspondingly, for the average of three attempts, it was 0.37 (2.29, p = 0.2) kg. The standard error of measurement (%) and minimal detectable change (%) of the strongest attempt was 1.64 kg (4.2%) and 3.55 kg (9.0%), respectively. Conclusions: Findings indicate low measurement error with high agreement and criterion validity for the comparison of Baseline BIMS Digital Grip Dynamometer and Jamar+ and that results of the two dynamometers can be used interchangeably.

AB - Introduction: Handgrip strength (HGS) is a strong predictor and easily applicable assessment, indicating a person's physical condition and health. However, many dynamometers are available; therefore, it is essential to ensure that the results of HGS testing using different dynamometers can be used interchangeably. The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the inter-instrument agreement and criterion validity of the Baseline BIMS Digital Grip Dynamometer in comparison with the Jamar electronic dynamometer (Jamar+). Methods: Seventy participants, aged between 23–88 (five men and five women in each decade from 20 to 80+), performed three attempts with each dynamometer (30-sec break between attempts) in a randomized order and separated with a 5-minute break between dynamometers. Intraclass correlation coefficient (3.1), standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change were used for comparison of the strongest and average strength measured with dynamometers. Jamar+ and Baseline BIMS Digital Grip Dynamometer were new dynamometers and considered calibrated by the manufacturer. Results: The overall Intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent (0.98). An average (SD) difference of 0.68 (2.2) kg (p = 0.04) was seen for the comparison of the strongest attempt for Baseline BIMS minus Jamar+, Correspondingly, for the average of three attempts, it was 0.37 (2.29, p = 0.2) kg. The standard error of measurement (%) and minimal detectable change (%) of the strongest attempt was 1.64 kg (4.2%) and 3.55 kg (9.0%), respectively. Conclusions: Findings indicate low measurement error with high agreement and criterion validity for the comparison of Baseline BIMS Digital Grip Dynamometer and Jamar+ and that results of the two dynamometers can be used interchangeably.

KW - Agreement: Strength

KW - Handgrip

KW - Measurements

KW - Reliability

KW - Validity

U2 - 10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101692

DO - 10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101692

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38705572

AN - SCOPUS:85193569387

VL - 43

JO - Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation

JF - Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation

SN - 2468-1229

IS - 3

M1 - 101692

ER -

ID: 393051255